{"id":10279,"date":"2007-03-22T09:40:14","date_gmt":"2007-03-22T13:40:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/10279.html"},"modified":"2007-03-22T09:40:14","modified_gmt":"2007-03-22T13:40:14","slug":"we-failed-to-zealously-represent-the-interests-of-the-american-public","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/we-failed-to-zealously-represent-the-interests-of-the-american-public\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;We failed to zealously represent the interests of the American public&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The [tag]Bush administration[\/tag]&#8217;s deal with the [tag]tobacco industry[\/tag] in 2005 has always been curious. As you may recall, the government, for reasons that no one could explain, asked the industry to pay $10 billion, instead of the $130 billion previously recommended by a government expert witness, at the conclusion of a massive racketeering trial.<\/p>\n<p>Today, we&#8217;re starting to learn why events <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/03\/21\/AR2007032102713.html\">unfolded as they did<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The leader of the [tag]Justice Department[\/tag] team that prosecuted a landmark lawsuit against tobacco companies said yesterday that Bush administration political appointees repeatedly ordered her to take steps that weakened the government&#8217;s racketeering case.<\/p>\n<p>Sharon Y. Eubanks said Bush loyalists in Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales&#8217;s office began micromanaging the team&#8217;s strategy in the final weeks of the 2005 trial, to the detriment of the government&#8217;s claim that the industry had conspired to lie to U.S. smokers.<\/p>\n<p>She said a supervisor demanded that she and her trial team drop recommendations that tobacco executives be removed from their corporate positions as a possible penalty. He and two others instructed her to tell key witnesses to change their testimony&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The political people were pushing the buttons and ordering us to say what we said,&#8221; Eubanks said. &#8220;And because of that, we failed to zealously represent the interests of the American public.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>She added that she was ordered to read, word for word, a closing argument they had rewritten to meet the administration&#8217;s political agenda, including a rationalization for a $10 billion penalty, instead of $130 billion. Eubanks said, &#8220;I couldn&#8217;t even look at the judge.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s more, Eubanks, the first time that any of the government lawyers on the case spoke at length publicly about political interference, said the problems in the tobacco case are symptomatic of a systemic problem at Bush&#8217;s Justice Department.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Eubanks, who retired from Justice in December 2005, said she is coming forward now because she is concerned about what she called the &#8220;overwhelming politicization&#8221; of the department demonstrated by the controversy over the firing of eight U.S. attorneys. Lawyers from Justice&#8217;s civil rights division have made similar claims about being overruled by supervisors in the past.<\/p>\n<p>Eubanks said Congress should not limit its investigation to the dismissal of the U.S. attorneys.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Political interference is happening at Justice across the department,&#8221; she said. &#8220;When decisions are made now in the Bush attorney general&#8217;s office, politics is the primary consideration&#8230;. The rule of law goes out the window.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If I only had a nickel for every time I&#8217;ve seen that phrase in relation to the Bush gang.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The [tag]Bush administration[\/tag]&#8217;s deal with the [tag]tobacco industry[\/tag] in 2005 has always been curious. As you may recall, the government, for reasons that no one could explain, asked the industry to pay $10 billion, instead of the $130 billion previously recommended by a government expert witness, at the conclusion of a massive racketeering trial. Today, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10279\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}