{"id":10328,"date":"2007-03-27T11:20:32","date_gmt":"2007-03-27T15:20:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/10328.html"},"modified":"2007-03-27T11:20:32","modified_gmt":"2007-03-27T15:20:32","slug":"lets-hope-north-korea-attacks-on-a-sunny-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/lets-hope-north-korea-attacks-on-a-sunny-day\/","title":{"rendered":"Let&#8217;s hope North Korea attacks on a sunny day"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In July, the Washington Examiner ran <a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/a-168837~Editorial__Where_are__Star_Wars__critics_now_.html\">an item<\/a> that said the U.S. has a system in place that &#8220;is poised to shoot down anything launched from [tag]North Korea[\/tag] that threatens the American homeland or the critical interests of our regional allies like Japan and Australia.&#8221; This development, the piece argued, has led long-time skeptics to become &#8220;noticeably absent,&#8221; as if our defenses have finally reached a point that proves the merit behind the missile-defense idea.<\/p>\n<p>Around the same time, I saw one far-right blog <a href=\"http:\/\/allthingsconservative.typepad.com\/all_things_conservative\/2006\/06\/thank_god_for_r.html\">argue<\/a> that the Pentagon&#8217;s decision to turn on the [tag]missile defense[\/tag] system is proof that &#8220;liberals were on the wrong side of history.&#8221; The post went on to say, &#8220;If not for Ronald Reagan, and his vision and leadership, we would now be at the mercy of that lunatic in North Korea.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>As it turns out, while the lunatic was poised to start testing his missiles, our miraculous, life-saving defense system was having some trouble. Apparently, <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.wired.com\/defense\/2007\/03\/a_quarter_of_th.html\">it was raining<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Torrential rains wiped out a quarter of the U.S.&#8217; intercontinental ballistic missile interceptors in Ft. Greely, Alaska last summer &#8212; right when North Korea was preparing to carry out an advanced missile launch, according to documents obtained by the Project On Government Oversight.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The flooding occurred during a three-week period between the end of June and early July 2006,&#8221; POGO notes, in a statement. &#8220;The flooding damaged 25% of the U.S. interceptor missiles&#8217; launch capability. These silos house the interceptor missiles that would be used to attempt to intercept a missile aimed at the United States. No interceptors were in the flooded silos.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Noah Shachtman <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.wired.com\/defense\/2007\/03\/a_quarter_of_th.html\">asked<\/a>, &#8220;What exactly are we getting, for the $9 billion a year we&#8217;re paying for missile defense?  And why can&#8217;t it take a <strike>little<\/strike> (ok, a whole bunch of) rain?&#8221;<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nConservative bravado about already being prepared to &#8220;shoot down anything launched from [tag]North Korea[\/tag]&#8221; has always been misplaced.  <\/p>\n<p>Indeed, as recently as August, as Kim Jung Il was poised to show off his missiles, U.S. officials were still testing whether the defense system was capable of <i>spotting<\/i> a target, not <i>hitting<\/i> it.<\/p>\n<p>This, coupled by the story about the rain, is a reminder of just how little this program <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2006\/07\/05\/rohrbacher-missile-defense\/\">has actually produced<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>* The Pentagon&#8217;s Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system <a href=\"http:\/\/www.defensetech.org\/archives\/002515.html\">hasn&#8217;t successfully intercepted a missile<\/a> since October of 2002&#8230;. And the last two times it tried to hit an oncoming missile, <strong>the interceptor didn&#8217;t even leave the ground<\/strong>. Things have gotten so bad that the Missile Defense Agency&#8217;s independent review team concluded last year that more tests may only undermine the GMD&#8217;s value as a deterrent.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* A recent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dodig.mil\/Audit\/reports\/FY06\/06060sum.htm\">Pentagon Inspector General report<\/a> found that <strong>security vulnerabilities are so serious<\/strong> &#8220;that the agency and its contractor, Boeing, <a href=\"http:\/\/fcw.com\/article92640-03-16-06-Web\">may not be able to prevent misuse of the system<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* &#8220;A little-noticed study by the Government Accountability Office issued in March found that program officials were <a href=\"http:\/\/seattletimes.nwsource.com\/html\/nationworld\/2003105209_antimissile23.html\">so concerned with potential flaws<\/a> in the first nine interceptors now in operation that they considered taking them out of their silos and <strong>returning them to their manufacturer for &#8216;disassembly and remanufacture.'&#8221;<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Just to be clear, I&#8217;d be thrilled if we had an effective defense system that could shoot down threatening missiles. But we don&#8217;t, and the one we&#8217;re working on may never offer a realistic defense. That doesn&#8217;t mean critics of the system are &#8220;on the wrong side of history&#8221;; it just means we&#8217;re the ones paying attention to whether the darn thing actually works.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In July, the Washington Examiner ran an item that said the U.S. has a system in place that &#8220;is poised to shoot down anything launched from [tag]North Korea[\/tag] that threatens the American homeland or the critical interests of our regional allies like Japan and Australia.&#8221; This development, the piece argued, has led long-time skeptics to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10328\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}