{"id":10337,"date":"2007-03-28T09:00:26","date_gmt":"2007-03-28T13:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/10337.html"},"modified":"2007-03-28T09:00:26","modified_gmt":"2007-03-28T13:00:26","slug":"senate-will-not-support-sustaining-a-flawed-and-failing-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/senate-will-not-support-sustaining-a-flawed-and-failing-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"Senate will not &#8216;support sustaining a flawed and failing policy&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following up on yesterday&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/10334.html\">item<\/a>, the [tag]Senate[\/tag] took up a measure to remove a [tag]withdrawal[\/tag] timetable from the spending package that pays for the [tag]war[\/tag] in [tag]Iraq[\/tag]. As recently as a few days ago, [tag]Republicans[\/tag] appeared confident that they had the votes. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/03\/27\/AR2007032700463.html\">They didn&#8217;t<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Senate Democrats scored a surprise victory yesterday in their bid to force President Bush to end the Iraq war, turning back a Republican amendment that would have struck a troop withdrawal plan from emergency military funding legislation.<\/p>\n<p>The defection of a prominent Republican war critic, Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, sealed the Democrats&#8217; win. Hagel, who opposed identical withdrawal language two weeks ago, walked onto the Senate floor an hour before the late-afternoon vote and announced that he would &#8220;not support sustaining a flawed and failing policy,&#8221; adding: &#8220;It&#8217;s now time for the Congress to step forward and establish responsible boundaries and conditions for our continued military involvement in Iraq.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Democratic leaders think the 50 to 48 victory greatly strengthens their negotiating position as they prepare to face down a White House that yesterday reiterated its threat of a presidential [tag]veto[\/tag]. The Senate vote was also the first time since Democrats took control of Congress in January that a majority of lawmakers have supported binding legislation to bring U.S. troops home.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I appreciate that there&#8217;s some general impatience with Congress, particularly since the election, and its inability to take a firm stand against the president&#8217;s misguided war policy. We hear the legitimate explanations &#8212; the Democratic majority is too narrow, congressional Dems are divided amongst themselves, too few Republicans will listen to reason &#8212; but wonder when something substantive is going to happen.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday, it did. The House and Senate, after extensive behind-the-scenes work, are sending the White House an unmistakable message: Bush doesn&#8217;t get a blank check and he doesn&#8217;t get an open-ended war.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe WaPo described this as a &#8220;surprise&#8221; win for Dems, and to a real extent, it was. Just two weeks ago, the Senate considered a similar measure with withdrawal language and Dems came up several votes short. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ken.), as recently as Monday morning, told reporters that he expected a similar outcome.<\/p>\n<p>But a few changes of heart mattered a great deal. The full roll-call vote list is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.senate.gov\/legislative\/LIS\/roll_call_lists\/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&#038;session=1&#038;vote=00116\">here<\/a>, but Sen. [tag]Chuck Hagel[\/tag] (R-Neb.) deserves kudos for his vote for a change. For months, if not years, he&#8217;d talk tough on the Sunday morning talk-shows, but on the floor, Hagel has voted, albeit reluctantly, with his caucus. This time, he and Sen. Gordon Smith (R-Ore.) actually followed-through on their commitments and took a stand against the president&#8217;s policy. It&#8217;s about time.<\/p>\n<p>As for the big picture, yesterday&#8217;s victory gives Democratic leaders leverage in negotiating with the White House.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Speaking to reporters, House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) was conciliatory, but only to a point: &#8220;We ought to reach out to the president and say, &#8216;Mr. President, this is not a unilateral government. It is a separation of powers, and the Congress of the United States . . . has taken some action. You obviously disagree with that. Where are the areas of compromise?&#8217; &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) said he was skeptical about proceeding too quickly. &#8220;Of course, we should reach out to the White House, and I&#8217;m happy to do that,&#8221; he said. But, he added: &#8220;They have been very uncooperative to this point. Hopefully, they will cooperate with us.&#8221; Referring to the president, he said, &#8220;I would like to have a bill that he wouldn&#8217;t veto.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/03\/28\/washington\/28cong.html?ex=1332734400&#038;en=3ba9f6d51329a896&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">said<\/a>, &#8220;When it comes to the war in Iraq, the American people have spoken, the House and Senate have spoken. Now, we hope the president is listening.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It would be out of character for him, but we can hope. At this point, it&#8217;s a debate he&#8217;s losing. Badly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following up on yesterday&#8217;s item, the [tag]Senate[\/tag] took up a measure to remove a [tag]withdrawal[\/tag] timetable from the spending package that pays for the [tag]war[\/tag] in [tag]Iraq[\/tag]. As recently as a few days ago, [tag]Republicans[\/tag] appeared confident that they had the votes. They didn&#8217;t. Senate Democrats scored a surprise victory yesterday in their bid to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10337","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10337","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10337"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10337\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10337"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10337"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10337"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}