{"id":10389,"date":"2007-04-02T15:48:20","date_gmt":"2007-04-02T19:48:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/10389.html"},"modified":"2007-04-02T15:48:20","modified_gmt":"2007-04-02T19:48:20","slug":"adventures-in-poll-question-wording","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/adventures-in-poll-question-wording\/","title":{"rendered":"Adventures in poll-question wording"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>No one knows how to stack a national poll with loaded questions like Fox News does. It&#8217;s almost impressive &#8212; most news outlets go out of their way to ask neutral questions, but the Republicans&#8217; network artfully does the opposite. FNC is practically offering professors of quantitative analysis case studies in what not to do in a poll.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/electioncentral.tpmcafe.com\/blog\/electioncentral\/2007\/apr\/02\/fox_news_polls_profiles_in_loaded_questions\">Eric Kleefeld notes<\/a> that the new <a href=\"http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/projects\/pdf\/032907_foxnewspoll.pdf\">Fox News poll<\/a> (.pdf), for example, tackles the prosecutor purge scandal.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Do you think a Congressional investigation into the dismissal of the eight federal prosecutors is a good use of taxpayer money?<\/p>\n<p>Yes 39%<br \/>\nNo 51%<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Frankly, giving that wording, it&#8217;s a pleasant surprise the results were this close.<\/p>\n<p>Real news outlets have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pollingreport.com\/bush.htm\">asked poll respondents<\/a> about whether they believe the firings were politically-motivated and whether White House officials should testify under oath. You know, <i>pertinent<\/i> details related to the issue at hand. But not our friends at Fox; they believe the key is asking people about a cost-benefit analysis. (Oddly, Fox News did not ask Americans whether the war in Iraq &#8220;is a good use of taxpayer money.&#8221; Maybe next time.)<\/p>\n<p>Wait, it gets better.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe poll then asked respondents about institutional influence over war policy.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Who do you trust more to decide when U.S. troops should leave Iraq &#8212; U.S. military commanders or Members of Congress?<\/p>\n<p>Commanders 69%<br \/>\nMembers of Congress 18%<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Again, given these choices, the fact that nearly one-in-five Americans prefer members of Congress suggests a) a lot of respondents were messing with what they saw as a slanted poll; or b) really love Congress right now. Fox could have asked the same question with the president vs. lawmakers, but that would be far less likely to produce the desired results.<\/p>\n<p>And then, the creme de la creme.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>After the 2004 presidential election, the president of the left-wing Moveon.org political action committee made the following comment about the Democratic Party, &#8216;In the last year, grassroots contributors like us gave more than $300 million to the Kerry campaign and the DNC, and proved that the Party doesn&#8217;t need corporate cash to be competitive. Now it&#8217;s our Party: we bought it, we own it and we&#8217;re going to take it back.&#8217; Do you think the Democratic Party should allow a grassroots organization like Moveon.org to take it over or should it resist this type of takeover?<\/p>\n<p>Should allow 16%<br \/>\nShould resist 61%<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s refreshing when Fox News drops the pretense; too often they protest and demand recognition as a real news outlet. Examples like these are helpful in highlighting just what a joke the network really is.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No one knows how to stack a national poll with loaded questions like Fox News does. It&#8217;s almost impressive &#8212; most news outlets go out of their way to ask neutral questions, but the Republicans&#8217; network artfully does the opposite. FNC is practically offering professors of quantitative analysis case studies in what not to do [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10389"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10389\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}