{"id":1041,"date":"2004-01-06T10:27:37","date_gmt":"2004-01-06T15:27:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/1041.html"},"modified":"2004-01-06T10:27:37","modified_gmt":"2004-01-06T15:27:37","slug":"bush-administration-working-to-make-new-overtime-rules-even-worse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/bush-administration-working-to-make-new-overtime-rules-even-worse\/","title":{"rendered":"Bush administration working to make new overtime rules even worse"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The fight over the Bush administration&#8217;s new overtime rules has been ongoing since the summer. In short, the proposal would make as many as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epinet.org\/content.cfm\/webfeatures_viewpoints_overtime_loss\">8 million U.S. workers ineligible<\/a> for overtime compensation.<\/p>\n<p>There was, however a saving grace to this controversial proposal. While millions would become exempt from overtime coverage, the administration&#8217;s plan would make 1.3 million low-income workers, who are currently ineligible for overtime pay, eligible.<\/p>\n<p>Good news, right? Sure, the administration wouldn&#8217;t be doing any favors for the 8 million who would lose out, but at least there&#8217;d be 1.3 million who would have expanded opportunities for overtime compensation. In total, the administration says, these 1.3 million people would collect nearly $900 million in increased wages. This was a standard GOP talking point on the Hill to make the controversial plan seem more palatable. Except&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Bush&#8217;s Labor Department wants to &#8220;help&#8221; businesses get around this benefit for low-income workers by &#8220;suggesting&#8221; ways to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A57106-2004Jan5.html\">avoid paying overtime to these newly-eligible employees<\/a>. (Thanks to Carpetbagger regular Chief Osceola for bringing this to my attention.)<\/p>\n<p>Bush&#8217;s Labor Department, for example, is letting employers know that they can cut workers&#8217; hourly wages, for example, and add the overtime to equal the original salary, that way, they won&#8217;t have to worry about paying these folks overtime. There are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A56877-2004Jan5.html\">additional suggestions<\/a> made available as well.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, the Bush administration is touting the wonderful and newly expanded opportunity for overtime pay for these 1.3 million low-income workers and, at the same time, effectively persuading employers to circumvent this opportunity. <\/p>\n<p>Of course, the administration isn&#8217;t <i>literally<\/i> encouraging employers to try and circumvent the new rules. As Labor Department spokesman Ed Frank told the AP, &#8220;We&#8217;re not saying anybody should do any of this.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is my early favorite for the most hilarious quote of 2004. The Labor Department is explaining exactly how to avoid paying low-income workers overtime compensation and then defends the suggestions by saying that the agency isn&#8217;t literally encouraging anyone to follow their advice. This is truly hilarious, even by Bush administration standards.<\/p>\n<p>Note to Democratic presidential candidates: Jump all over this one.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The fight over the Bush administration&#8217;s new overtime rules has been ongoing since the summer. In short, the proposal would make as many as 8 million U.S. workers ineligible for overtime compensation. There was, however a saving grace to this controversial proposal. While millions would become exempt from overtime coverage, the administration&#8217;s plan would make [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1041","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1041","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1041"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1041\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1041"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1041"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1041"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}