{"id":10456,"date":"2007-04-09T13:12:47","date_gmt":"2007-04-09T17:12:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/10456.html"},"modified":"2007-04-09T13:12:47","modified_gmt":"2007-04-09T17:12:47","slug":"lieberman-pulls-a-cheney-on-pelosi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/lieberman-pulls-a-cheney-on-pelosi\/","title":{"rendered":"Lieberman pulls a Cheney on Pelosi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I am so spectacularly tired of debunking the right&#8217;s absurd attacks on Speaker Pelosi&#8217;s Syria trip that I promised not to do anymore posts on the subject. But <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2007\/04\/08\/lieberman-pelosi\/\">Joe Lieberman&#8217;s nonsense<\/a> yesterday requires just one more visit to the subject.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[Yesterday] on CNN, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) said he &#8220;strongly disagrees&#8221; with Speaker Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s (D-CA) bipartisan delegation to Syria, calling it a &#8220;mistake&#8221; and &#8220;bad for the United States of America.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Lieberman added, &#8220;I say this because we&#8217;re in a war. We&#8217;re in a war against the Islamic terrorists who attacked us on 9-11-01.&#8221; CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer responded, &#8220;But they had nothing to do with 9-11.&#8221; Lieberman dodged the issue and changed topics.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now, it was telling that it took Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), of all people, to step in and <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.abcnews.com\/politicalradar\/2007\/04\/republican_defe.html\">defend Pelosi<\/a>. On the same CNN program, Specter, who has made a series of trips to Syria in recent years, said, &#8220;She has a very prominent constitutional role in determining what&#8217;s going to happen in the Iraq war. I don&#8217;t think it is helpful for people in the administration to characterize her as being engaged in, quote &#8216;bad behavior,&#8217; unquote.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Regardless, Lieberman&#8217;s smear seemed unusually inane, even by his standards. Indeed, his comments were <i>transparently<\/i> wrong, with no real foundation in reality. The president <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2007\/04\/08\/rahall-syria-trip\/\">knew<\/a> about Pelosi&#8217;s trip in advance; an administration official participated in the discussion at Damascus; Republican lawmakers also traveled to Syria and met with Assad; Pelosi&#8217;s message from Israel could play a helpful diplomatic role, and the line the Speaker took with the Syrians <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2007\/04\/05\/kristol-pelosi-syria\/\"><em>reinforced<\/em><\/a> Bush administration policy. (And let&#8217;s not even bother with Syria&#8217;s role in 9\/11.)<\/p>\n<p>So, why make blatantly bogus attacks on national television? Because as Ezra <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prospect.org\/weblog\/2007\/04\/post_3375.html#016185\">explained<\/a> very well today, the push-back against Pelosi isn&#8217;t really about Syria or last week&#8217;s trip.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What we&#8217;re really seeing here is a side battle of the Iraq funding fight; Bush is trying to weaken Pelosi on foreign policy issues in advance of his veto. Lieberman, too, is trying to paint those he disagrees with as weak, untrustworthy, and ill-informed on terror, a particularly rich approach given that his attacks betray an utter incomprehension of who we&#8217;re actually at war with and who attacked us on 9\/11. And so it goes, that&#8217;s politics. <\/p>\n<p>But this issue isn&#8217;t complicated. Bush and the State Department both knew about Pelosi&#8217;s trip. Dozens of members of Congress have gone to Syria and met with Assad; none of them have faced criticism for the act. Bush discovered a newfound problem with the trip when some advisors suggested there&#8217;d be an opening to put Democrats on the defensive by pretending to protect the traditional powers of the presidency and create a false proxy war over Congress&#8217;s ability to interfere with his foreign policy. Lieberman also doesn&#8217;t want Congress employing oversight against Bush, and so was willing to go all 2003 on us and mendaciously equate Syria to 9\/11. Everyone&#8217;s got their own games here, but just about none of them have to do with Syria, or even Pelosi&#8217;s trip. That&#8217;s just pretext.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Excellent point. Some of Pelosi&#8217;s right-wing critics have been attacking her for trivia, such as wearing a head-scarf to a Syrian mosque, but the Bush\/Lieberman line is more sophisticated than sophomoric nonsense. It&#8217;s also equally malicious.<\/p>\n<p>When the House passed the Dems&#8217; withdrawal timelines, tied to funding the war, Pelosi emerged from the fight stronger and with more stature. Going into a fight with the White House over funding (timelines vs. open-ended commitment), a resilient Speaker with a popular message was politically inconvenient.<\/p>\n<p>So they came up with this garbage to bring her down a peg (or two), not because the facts support their claims, but because facts are utterly irrelevant.<\/p>\n<p><em>Post Script<\/em>: By the way, am I the only one who gets the impression that Lieberman intentionally says stupid things just to annoy liberal bloggers? Or is it to test the limits of the caucus&#8217; patience?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I am so spectacularly tired of debunking the right&#8217;s absurd attacks on Speaker Pelosi&#8217;s Syria trip that I promised not to do anymore posts on the subject. But Joe Lieberman&#8217;s nonsense yesterday requires just one more visit to the subject. [Yesterday] on CNN, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) said he &#8220;strongly disagrees&#8221; with Speaker Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10456\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}