{"id":10725,"date":"2007-05-07T12:40:20","date_gmt":"2007-05-07T16:40:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/10725.html"},"modified":"2007-05-07T12:40:20","modified_gmt":"2007-05-07T16:40:20","slug":"the-ap-takes-on-keith-olbermann","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/the-ap-takes-on-keith-olbermann\/","title":{"rendered":"The AP takes on Keith Olbermann"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The [tag]AP[\/tag] ran an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/wire\/ap\/archive.html?wire=D8OV121G0.html\">important piece<\/a> over the weekend about the media generally and MSNBC&#8217;s Keith Olbermann specifically that deserves to be read. I describe the article as important because it captures the broader political dynamic in exactly the wrong way.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In an angry commentary on April 25, MSNBC&#8217;s Keith Olbermann accused Rudolph Giuliani of using the language of Osama bin Laden with &#8220;the same chilling nonchalance of the madman&#8221; to argue that Republicans would keep Americans safer than Democrats from terror.<\/p>\n<p>Eight days later, [tag]Olbermann[\/tag] hosted MSNBC&#8217;s coverage of the first debate among Republican candidates for president.<\/p>\n<p>Olbermann&#8217;s popularity and evolving image as an idealogue [<i>sic<\/i>] has led NBC News to stretch traditional notions of journalistic objectivity. The danger for MSNBC is provoking the same anger among Republicans that Democrats feel toward Fox News Channel.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This entire analysis is misguided. Olbermann offered viewers a &#8220;special comment&#8221; criticizing Giuliani&#8217;s offensive comments a couple of weeks ago, which the AP suggests should disqualify him from the network&#8217;s GOP debate coverage. Consider, however, the flipside &#8212; MSNBC asked Chris Matthews to <i>moderate<\/i> that debate despite having <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200705050003\">told viewers<\/a> recently that Giuliani &#8220;may well be the perfect candidate to replace&#8221; President Bush &#8212; who Matthews has memorably said &#8220;glimmers&#8221; with &#8220;sunny nobility.&#8221; Matthews also all but endorsed McCain, declaring that he &#8220;deserves to be president.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Why is Olbermann&#8217;s criticism noteworthy, while Matthews&#8217; sycophantic praise not? For that matter, the same debate coverage also featured MSNBC&#8217;s Joe Scarborough, who was not only a Republican congressman, but also an <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2007\/05\/05\/ap-on-olbermann\/\">active Bush supporter<\/a> in 2004. The AP article seems to missed this little tidbit.<\/p>\n<p>But the Olbermann-Fox News comparison is even more bizarre.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Having Olbermann anchor &#8212; as he will continue, with Matthews, for big political nights throughout the campaign &#8212; is the MSNBC equivalent of Fox News Channel assigning the same duties to O&#8217;Reilly.<\/p>\n<p>Fox has never done that, perhaps mindful of the immediate controversy that would result. Fox has tried to differentiate between its news operation and its prime-time opinion shows, even as its critics believe strongly that&#8217;s bunk. In this case, MSNBC doesn&#8217;t try to separate news and opinion people, even as it tries to separate news and opinion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Olbermann may enjoy upbraiding O&#8217;Reilly, but that hardly makes them two sides of the same coin. The comparison is wildly off-base &#8212; O&#8217;Reilly is a demagogue and a bully, who routinely makes up &#8220;facts&#8221; to smear his perceived enemies. Olbermann is an anchor who, on occasion, helps cut through the he-said, she-said reporting that dominates American journalism, and actually tells viewers when one side is wrong.<\/p>\n<p>I suspect the right would find this controversial, but I&#8217;m not even convinced that Olbermann is particularly liberal. He seems to be disgusted by conservative demagoguery, extra-legal excesses, and general incompetence, but I&#8217;ve never seen him promote or endorse a Democratic alternative. Olbermann, it seems to me, would be equally likely to go after Dems, with the same degree of gusto, if they were equally reckless and irresponsible.<\/p>\n<p>Joan Walsh <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/opinion\/walsh\/2007\/05\/07\/olbermann\/index.html\">added<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Setting up Olbermann as O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s counterpart is deeply unfair and dishonest.<\/p>\n<p>The ways that Olbermann differs from O&#8217;Reilly are too many to count here. First and foremost, he doesn&#8217;t run jihads against his enemies (well, except maybe Bill O&#8217;Reilly); he doesn&#8217;t invite people he disagrees with onto his show only to shout at and humiliate them; he rarely rants, and when he does, he labels it &#8220;commentary.&#8221; His &#8220;Countdown&#8221; is an opinionated take on the day&#8217;s top five stories that owes more to &#8220;The Daily Show&#8221; and &#8220;Best Week Ever&#8221; than the Nation. He is indeed a Bush critic, but I haven&#8217;t found him to be a Democratic partisan&#8230;. Certainly as an anchor, he&#8217;s far less partisan than Fox&#8217;s dark Brit Hume, known for regular slurs against Democrats. To compare Olbermann to Hume would be unfair; to compare him to O&#8217;Reilly is disgraceful.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I get the sense that Olbermann is drawing special criticism because he&#8217;s unique &#8212; he&#8217;s the only unabashed Bush critic to host a television show on any major U.S. news network. For that, he&#8217;s the subject of hackish articles like this AP piece. It&#8217;s a shame.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The [tag]AP[\/tag] ran an important piece over the weekend about the media generally and MSNBC&#8217;s Keith Olbermann specifically that deserves to be read. I describe the article as important because it captures the broader political dynamic in exactly the wrong way. In an angry commentary on April 25, MSNBC&#8217;s Keith Olbermann accused Rudolph Giuliani of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10725","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10725\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}