{"id":10747,"date":"2007-05-09T13:20:24","date_gmt":"2007-05-09T17:20:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/10747.html"},"modified":"2007-05-09T13:20:24","modified_gmt":"2007-05-09T17:20:24","slug":"would-bush-veto-funding-for-the-war-twice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/would-bush-veto-funding-for-the-war-twice\/","title":{"rendered":"Would Bush veto funding for the war twice?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After the president vetoed the last congressionally-backed war-funding bill, there was widespread speculation about what Democratic lawmakers would try next. Yesterday, House Dems appeared to rally behind <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/05\/08\/AR2007050801991.html\">a new plan<\/a>, which would give Bush all the funding he wants, with no withdrawal timeline &#8212; in kind of a down-payment plan.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A House Democratic proposal introduced yesterday that would give President Bush half of the money he has requested for the war effort, with a vote in July on whether to approve the rest, hinges on progress in meeting political benchmarks that Iraq has thus far found difficult to achieve.<\/p>\n<p>The House measure, which could come to a vote as early as tomorrow, would substantially raise the pressure on Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki&#8217;s government to meet lagging commitments &#8212; including new laws on oil revenue and de-Baathification, constitutional revisions, provincial elections and the demobilization of militias &#8212; that Bush has said are crucial to the success of the U.S. military strategy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the deal: Bush wants $95.5 billion right now to fund the wars. According to the House Dem plan, Bush would get $43 billion now, which would finance the war through July, and the rest would be contingent on the White House demonstrating some kind of progress in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>House Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.) came up with the plan and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said it could be brought to the floor as early as tomorrow. Even some House Republicans thought the idea <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/05\/08\/AR2007050801991.html\">had merit<\/a> &#8212; Rep. Jim Gerlach (Pa.) said he saw an advantage in freeing up part of the money immediately while holding Iraqi feet to the fire. &#8220;Do we need to put things out in front of the Iraqi government that makes them realize they have to do certain things to continue the support of the American people? Absolutely,&#8221; Gerlach said.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday, the White House didn&#8217;t sound fond of the idea. Tony Snow described the approach as &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/05\/09\/washington\/09cong.html?ei=5090&#038;en=dc89421310e65f45&#038;ex=1336363200&#038;adxnnl=1&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss&#038;adxnnlx=1178708532-LNqg2N9QWDJ\/W0WQT7gqqA\">bad management<\/a>.&#8221; Today, the Bush gang went quite a bit further, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/05\/09\/AR2007050900797.html\">vowing to veto<\/a> the spending measure.<\/p>\n<p>How many times is the president prepared to reject funding for the war? I would suggest he might pay a political price, but with a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/18505030\/site\/newsweek\/\">28%<\/a> approval rating, I suspect he&#8217;s at rock bottom anyway.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After the president vetoed the last congressionally-backed war-funding bill, there was widespread speculation about what Democratic lawmakers would try next. Yesterday, House Dems appeared to rally behind a new plan, which would give Bush all the funding he wants, with no withdrawal timeline &#8212; in kind of a down-payment plan. A House Democratic proposal introduced [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10747","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10747","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10747"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10747\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10747"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10747"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10747"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}