{"id":10829,"date":"2007-05-17T15:12:57","date_gmt":"2007-05-17T19:12:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/10829.html"},"modified":"2007-05-17T15:12:57","modified_gmt":"2007-05-17T19:12:57","slug":"a-no-confidence-vote-in-gonzales-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/a-no-confidence-vote-in-gonzales-2\/","title":{"rendered":"A no-confidence vote in Gonzales"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>About a month ago, after the White House refused to even consider replacing Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Roll Call <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rollcall.com\/issues\/1_1\/breakingnews\/18147-1.html\">reported<\/a> that Senate Dems were &#8220;seriously considering bringing a resolution to the floor expressing no confidence in Gonzales.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>A senior leadership source told Roll Call the measure would be non-binding &#8212; Congress can&#8217;t force the president to fire members of his cabinet &#8212; but it would a) make it abundantly, <i>officially<\/i> clear that Gonzales had lost the support of Congress; and b) put Senate Republicans on the spot, either standing with an incompetent and helplessly dishonest AG or standing against him.<\/p>\n<p>And then &#8230; nothing. The idea seemed to quickly vanish, and no one&#8217;s really talked about the idea since. That is, <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2007\/05\/17\/breaking-senators-want-gonzales-no-confidence-vote\/\">until today<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>At a press conference moments ago, Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called on the Senate to hold a no-confidence vote on Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.<\/p>\n<p>FEINSTEIN: I join with Sen. Schumer in saying I think the time has come for the Senate to express its will. And that will is simply to say that we lack confidence in Attorney General Gonzales. I don&#8217;t like saying this. I very much regret saying it. I want to say exactly the opposite. But in view of what I know, I can&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>Whether it was the torture memo, whether it&#8217;s Guantanamo, whether it&#8217;s Geneva Convention, whether it&#8217;s U.S. Attorneys, whether it&#8217;s I don&#8217;t know I can&#8217;t recall, a department as major as this, I don&#8217;t think the American people are well served. I&#8217;m hopeful this can be worked out. But there comes a time when you have to say what you think, and this is what I think.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, what happens now?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nOnce a resolution is introduced, Senate Dems should flock to it fairly quickly. Three Senate Republicans have already called for Gonzales&#8217; ouster, and they&#8217;ll likely endorse the measure, if not sign on as co-sponsors. The White House will denounce it, of course, but on this, the president doesn&#8217;t get a vote.<\/p>\n<p>It would almost certainly put most of the GOP caucus in an awkward position. Criticizing Gonzales is one thing, calling on the president to replace him is another, but voting for a no-confidence resolution is one step shy of impeachment. Will the Republican caucus embrace a man already exposed as a liar and probable law-breaker? Does the GOP dare filibuster? Would they have the votes to keep it up?<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the bigger question is what the White House does. Let&#8217;s say the resolution passes, which I think is pretty likely. Would the president keep an Attorney General that <i>officially<\/i> lost the confidence of Congress? <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/18246425\/site\/newsweek\/\">I wouldn&#8217;t put it past him<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>One White House adviser (who asked not to be ID&#8217;ed talking about sensitive issues) said the support reflected Bush&#8217;s own view that a Gonzales resignation would embolden the Dems to go after other targets &#8212; like Karl Rove. &#8220;This is about Bush saying, &#8216;Screw you&#8217;,&#8221; said the adviser.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Stay tuned.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>About a month ago, after the White House refused to even consider replacing Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Roll Call reported that Senate Dems were &#8220;seriously considering bringing a resolution to the floor expressing no confidence in Gonzales.&#8221; A senior leadership source told Roll Call the measure would be non-binding &#8212; Congress can&#8217;t force the president [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10829","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10829","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10829"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10829\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10829"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10829"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10829"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}