{"id":11010,"date":"2007-06-04T14:00:07","date_gmt":"2007-06-04T18:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11010.html"},"modified":"2007-06-04T14:00:07","modified_gmt":"2007-06-04T18:00:07","slug":"what-is-bob-novak-talking-about","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/what-is-bob-novak-talking-about\/","title":{"rendered":"What is Bob Novak talking about?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Obviously, the notion that a person is innocent until proven guilty is a bedrock principle. But when it comes to General Services Administration chief Lurita Alexis Doan and alleged Hatch Act violations, she looks about as guilty as a political figure can.<\/p>\n<p>This has always been a second-tier Bush administration scandal, but it&#8217;s still highly entertaining. In January, Karl Rove&#8217;s office conducted a partisan political presentation for GSA higher-ups, after which Doan asked GSA political appointees how they could &#8220;help &#8216;our candidates'&#8221; in the 2008 elections. After several credible GSA employees came forward to report this, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee called Doan to testify about politicizing her non-partisan government agency.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.tpmmuckraker.com\/archives\/002896.php\">It was a disaster<\/a>. GSA employees were apparently shown a series of slides detailing which seats Karl Rove considers &#8220;vulnerable&#8221; or &#8220;targets,&#8221; and the Republicans&#8217; chances of winning the seats. Doan said it was &#8220;a team-building meeting.&#8221; A lawmaker on the committee asked, &#8220;This was a partisan political briefing; it occurred on GSA property, during work hours, and it had nothing to do with the GSA mission. You identified &#8216;team building&#8217; as one of the purposes of this meeting. Can you explain to the taxpayers of this country how holding this partisan political briefing helped with team-building?&#8221; Doan couldn&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>The Hatch Act explicitly prohibits partisan campaign activities on federal property and Doan&#8217;s GSA obviously violated it. (After the hearing, Doan became so paranoid, she told an aide to take her water glass with her, because she didn&#8217;t want anyone to &#8220;have any fingerprints.&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>And as far as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/06\/03\/AR2007060300952.html\">Bob Novak is concerned<\/a>, the real problem is that Republicans refuse to rally to Doan&#8217;s defense. Seriously.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A year ago Lurita Alexis Doan, an innovative African American entrepreneur from Northern Virginia, took a big government job: chief executive of the General Services Administration (GSA). After 12 months she is on the ropes. She is the victim of a fiercely partisan Democratic congressman, an obscure government official trying to vindicate himself and a lame-duck Republican White House unwilling to protect her.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Even by Novak standards, this is hilarious.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nNovak complains that Doan is accused of &#8220;violating the 68-year-old Hatch Act.&#8221; One rarely sees reporters list the <i>age<\/i> of a law &#8212; as if it&#8217;s relevant. Perhaps Bush administration officials should only follow the newer laws? Are 68-year-old laws somehow less important than the recently-passed ones?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>With the GSA&#8217;s 13,000 employees and $56 billion in annual contracts (to construct and maintain federal buildings), Doan was naive in thinking it enough to institute businesslike procedures. &#8220;Ever since I made the decision to restore fiscal discipline to all divisions within GSA,&#8221; she has said, &#8220;I have had to face a series of personal attacks and charges.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>She politicized her agency, misled lawmakers about her conduct under oath, and got caught. This isn&#8217;t about &#8220;restoring fiscal discipline.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Doan was taken by surprise that day to find Waxman concentrating instead on a Jan. 26 political briefing about the 2006 elections by Scott Jennings, deputy White House political director, to 30 GSA political appointees &#8212; including Administrator Doan. Such briefings were delivered by Jennings throughout the federal government and are not viewed by the White House as violating the 1939 Hatch Act.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>First, there&#8217;s that age of the law again. Second, Novak argues, without a hint of humor, that the White House doesn&#8217;t believe its own partisan political briefings constituted partisan political briefings. In other words, the Bush gang has looked at its own conduct, and concluded that they&#8217;re doing everything right. Convinced?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[T]he Jan. 26 meeting targeted no candidate for support, solicited no GSA employee for political activity and resulted in no follow-up.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The meeting targeted <i>dozens<\/i> of candidates for support and prompted the administrator for the GSA to ask <i>all<\/i> of her top employees that they could &#8220;help &#8216;our candidates'&#8221; in the 2008 elections. There wasn&#8217;t follow-up because her staffers complained and an investigation began.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the Office of Special Counsel, headed by a Bush partisan, concluded that Doan violated the Hatch Act. It seems pretty straightforward &#8212; to everyone except Novak.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t expect much from Novak, but this column is truly an embarrassment. I know that columnists must occasionally struggle for content, but there had to be something else to write about. This just makes him look ridiculous.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Obviously, the notion that a person is innocent until proven guilty is a bedrock principle. But when it comes to General Services Administration chief Lurita Alexis Doan and alleged Hatch Act violations, she looks about as guilty as a political figure can. This has always been a second-tier Bush administration scandal, but it&#8217;s still highly [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11010","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11010","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11010"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11010\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11010"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11010"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11010"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}