{"id":11056,"date":"2007-06-08T10:30:18","date_gmt":"2007-06-08T14:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11056.html"},"modified":"2007-06-08T10:30:18","modified_gmt":"2007-06-08T14:30:18","slug":"conservatives-campaigns-and-creationism-oh-my-redux","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/conservatives-campaigns-and-creationism-oh-my-redux\/","title":{"rendered":"Conservatives, campaigns, and creationism &#8230; oh my (redux)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>USA Today had an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/politics\/election2008\/2007-06-07-evolution_N.htm\">interesting item<\/a> on a topic that has generated a surprising amount of attention in two separate Republican presidential debates: modern biology.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, a Baptist minister, have been explaining their positions ever since they and Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo first indicated in a May 3 debate that they do not believe in evolution. Their religious views, they say, are compatible with science.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think science is marvelous and wonderful, and I enjoy the benefit of it every day,&#8221; Huckabee told reporters Wednesday at a lunch. He said he embraces Scripture, but &#8220;to me, it&#8217;s not a conflict with science.&#8221; [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Democratic strategist Mark Mellman, Kerry&#8217;s 2004 pollster who is not affiliated with a current candidate, said they make their party look like &#8220;a front for the Flat Earth Society.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The image could cause serious damage with &#8220;swing voters who are culturally progressive,&#8221; Mellman said &#8212; &#8220;not because evolution is their most important issue but because it says something significant about their cultural orientation. They aren&#8217;t interested in rational scientific explanation and discourse.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That last point seems like the key to the discussion over the last few weeks. For a presidential candidate, in 2007, to concede disbelief in the cornerstone of modern biology doesn&#8217;t reflect well on their understanding of facts and evidence. If they reject the overwhelming proof on evolutionary biology, how will they deal with evidence of global warming? Or stem-cell research? Or a public health emergency? Or <i>any<\/i> public policy that deals with science?<\/p>\n<p>On Tuesday, when Wolf Blitzer raised the subject, Mike Huckabee <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/06\/05\/us\/politics\/05cnd-transcript.html?pagewanted=print\">said<\/a>, &#8220;It&#8217;s interesting that that question would even be asked of somebody running for president. I&#8217;m not planning on writing the curriculum for an eighth-grade science book. I&#8217;m asking for the opportunity to be president of the United States.&#8221; Which is why I think Mellman was right about the underlying point. Do the candidates care about <i>reason<\/i>?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nOddly enough, though the Republican candidates seem a little annoyed by the interest, both the reality-based community and their rivals on the right seem to be interested in the responses.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Most of us don&#8217;t think that we&#8217;re just apes with trousers,&#8221; said Gary Bauer, a Christian conservative who ran for president in 2000. He said Huckabee and Brownback have been &#8220;refreshing&#8221; on the subject. He also said that, while a president doesn&#8217;t have direct influence on curriculum, the discussion is &#8220;an interesting marker on worldviews.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Lawrence Krauss, a scientist at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, said it is a warning flag. He said a president &#8220;who denies something at the basis of modern biology&#8221; would not be a credible leader on education or economic growth driven by biotechnology, would hobble scientific research and would lack international stature.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>My biggest concern, of course, is that Mellman is wrong about the creationists making the GOP look like &#8220;a front for the Flat Earth Society.&#8221; The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/washington\/2007-06-07-evolution-debate_N.htm\">latest polls are discouraging<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Majorities of Americans in a new USA TODAY\/Gallup Poll say evolution and creationism are both likely explanations for life on Earth &#8212; underscoring the complexities of an issue that has put Republican presidential candidates on the spot in recent weeks.<\/p>\n<p>Two-thirds in the poll said creationism, the idea that God created humans in their present form within the past 10,000 years, is definitely or probably true. More than half, 53%, said evolution, the idea that humans evolved from less advanced life forms over millions of years, is definitely or probably true. All told, 25% say that both creationism and evolution are definitely or probably true.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I tried to wrap my head around these results, hoping to make heads of tails of public opinion, but quickly gave up.<\/p>\n<p>I like to think Mellman is right, and &#8220;swing voters who are culturally progressive&#8221; would look askance at a candidate who still doesn&#8217;t believe in evolution, but those polls give me pause.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>USA Today had an interesting item on a topic that has generated a surprising amount of attention in two separate Republican presidential debates: modern biology. Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, a Baptist minister, have been explaining their positions ever since they and Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo first indicated in a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11056","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11056","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11056"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11056\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11056"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11056"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11056"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}