{"id":11161,"date":"2007-06-18T12:35:45","date_gmt":"2007-06-18T16:35:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11161.html"},"modified":"2007-06-18T12:35:45","modified_gmt":"2007-06-18T16:35:45","slug":"what-times-new-action-heroes-have-in-common","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/what-times-new-action-heroes-have-in-common\/","title":{"rendered":"What Time&#8217;s &#8216;New Action Heroes&#8217; have in common"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Time&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/nation\/article\/0,8599,1632736,00.html\">cover story<\/a> this week is a wildly complimentary piece about Michael Bloomberg and Arnold Schwarzenegger, whom the magazine dubs, &#8220;The New Action Heroes.&#8221; I actually found the article interesting for what it <i>didn&#8217;t<\/i> say.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not just a shameless puff piece (though it&#8217;s partly that); the point of Michael Grunwald&#8217;s article seems to be that Bloomberg and Schwarzenegger are picking up the slack from DC and delivering on a popular policy agenda that Americans actually like.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>On an unseasonably hot May day in Central Park, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg &#8212; the pint-size billionaire whose last name needs no elaboration for anyone who knows anything about finance or the media &#8212; was talking about saving the planet. With the mayors of more than 30 of the world&#8217;s largest cities at his side, Bloomberg was opening a climate summit, highlighting his ambitious plan to slash the Big Apple&#8217;s carbon emissions. Together, the mayors pledged to enlist their 250 million constituents in the fight against global warming. &#8220;Unfortunately, partisan politics has immobilized Washington,&#8221; Bloomberg said. &#8220;But the public wants this problem solved. Cities can&#8217;t wait any longer for national governments to act.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>At a lab in Toronto a week later, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger &#8212; the fridge-size multimillionaire whose last name needs no elaboration, period &#8212; was talking about eliminating disease. The Governator was announcing a new stem-cell partnership with Ontario, highlighting the $3 billion his state is investing in research the Bush Administration has opposed. In that unmistakable Ahhll-be-bahhk accent, the five-time Mr. Universe spoke of his father-in-law Sargent Shriver, the Peace Corps founder who suffers from Alzheimer&#8217;s and no longer recognizes his family. &#8220;I look forward to curing all these terrible illnesses,&#8221; Schwarzenegger said. &#8220;We&#8217;re showing how powerful a state can be. Cahh-lifornia doesn&#8217;t need to wait for the Federal government.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The broader argument isn&#8217;t subtle. The article insists that DC has become bogged down in rancor, while &#8220;heroes&#8221; like Bloomberg and Schwarzenegger are stepping up to get something done for their constituents. Time says Washington has &#8220;failed&#8221; to do big things, &#8220;paralysis&#8221; has overcome the federal process, and &#8220;partisanship-on-crack has made compromise almost impossible.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Nature abhors a vacuum,&#8221; said Bruce Katz, director of metropolitan policy at the Brookings Institution. &#8220;And the vacuum at the national level is immense.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But let&#8217;s not forget that there&#8217;s a very clear explanation for why this is.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIn a general sense, why are Bloomberg and Schwarzenegger &#8220;heroes&#8221;? Because, if we put aside policy specifics, they&#8217;re Republicans who shun the GOP base to work with Democratic majorities on climate change, stem-cell research, universal health care, gun control, affordable housing, aid for the working poor, and infrastructure projects.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;All the great ideas are coming from state and local governments,&#8221; Schwarzenegger told Time. &#8220;We&#8217;re not going to wait for Big Daddy to take care of us.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s fine, as far as it goes, but it&#8217;s a reminder of how great Washington can be if a) there were a moderate Republican in the White House willing to work with a Democratic Congress on a progressive domestic policy agenda; or b) there were a Democratic president in the White House working with a Democratic Congress on a progressive domestic policy agenda.<\/p>\n<p>Honestly, what do Bloomberg and Schwarzenegger have that Bush doesn&#8217;t, other than an approval rating above 30%? They have a desire to work with Democratic policy makers on all the things Democrats and voters <i>already want<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>In DC, we have a Democratic Congress chomping at the bit to deliver, but we also have a Republican minority that loves obstructionism a little too much and a Republican president who&#8217;s on the wrong side of every policy matter.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[I]n the Bush Administration, domestic policy has understandably yielded to foreign policy. But it has also yielded to politics; even before Claude Allen was caught boosting goodies at Target, everyone knew Karl Rove was the real domestic-policy adviser. (Now the title belongs to Karl Zinsmeister &#8212; yes, the Karl Zinsmeister.) So while the Administration has embraced a few domestic issues &#8212; cutting taxes, promoting faith-based initiatives, requiring schools to test students, subsidizing prescription drugs and pushing (unsuccessfully) to restructure Social Security &#8212; its hacks have consistently outflanked its wonks. <\/p>\n<p>And while the new Democratic Congress has vowed to revive domestic policy, so far the only measure it has persuaded Bush to sign has been a minimum-wage increase.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>No, I don&#8217;t really expect Time magazine to actually come right out and say, &#8220;Washington is failing and it&#8217;s Bush&#8217;s fault,&#8221; because that would be impolitic. It would also be true.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Time&#8217;s cover story this week is a wildly complimentary piece about Michael Bloomberg and Arnold Schwarzenegger, whom the magazine dubs, &#8220;The New Action Heroes.&#8221; I actually found the article interesting for what it didn&#8217;t say. It&#8217;s not just a shameless puff piece (though it&#8217;s partly that); the point of Michael Grunwald&#8217;s article seems to be [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11161\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}