{"id":11346,"date":"2007-07-05T12:42:35","date_gmt":"2007-07-05T16:42:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11346.html"},"modified":"2007-07-05T12:42:35","modified_gmt":"2007-07-05T16:42:35","slug":"thompson-was-a-mole-for-the-white-house","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/thompson-was-a-mole-for-the-white-house\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Thompson was a mole for the White House&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Fred Thompson&#8217;s political resume is a little on the thin side. He was a senator who developed a reputation for avoiding hard work; he was a high-priced corporate lobbyist, though that probably won&#8217;t help much on the campaign trail; he was an assistant U.S. Attorney almost 40 years ago; and in 1973, he was minority counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee.<\/p>\n<p>That last one is apparently a point of some pride for the actor\/lobbyist\/lawyer. On his exploratory website, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imwithfred.com\/About.aspx\">Thompson boasts<\/a> that he &#8220;gained national attention&#8221; as the &#8220;hard-charging counsel&#8221; who took the &#8220;lead&#8221; in revealing the audio-taping system in Nixon&#8217;s Oval Office.<\/p>\n<p>It all sounds quite impressive &#8212; just so long as you overlook the fact that Thompson was actually <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boston.com\/news\/nation\/washington\/articles\/2007\/07\/04\/not_all_would_put_a_heroic_sheen_on_thompsons_watergate_role\/\">relentlessly partisan<\/a> and anxious to <i>protect<\/i> Nixon during the Watergate investigation.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The day before Senate Watergate Committee minority counsel Fred Thompson made the inquiry that launched him into the national spotlight &#8212; asking an aide to President Nixon whether there was a White House taping system &#8212; he telephoned Nixon&#8217;s lawyer.<\/p>\n<p>Thompson tipped off the White House that the committee knew about the taping system and would be making the information public. In his all-but-forgotten Watergate memoir, &#8220;At That Point in Time,&#8221; Thompson said he acted with &#8220;no authority&#8221; in divulging the committee&#8217;s knowledge of the tapes, which provided the evidence that led to Nixon&#8217;s resignation. It was one of many Thompson leaks to the Nixon team, according to a former investigator for Democrats on the committee, Scott Armstrong , who remains upset at Thompson&#8217;s actions.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Thompson was a mole for the White House,&#8221; Armstrong said in an interview. &#8220;Fred was working hammer and tong to defeat the investigation of finding out what happened to authorize Watergate and find out what the role of the president was.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Thompson may want to update that bio page on his exploratory website. He seems to have left out a few details.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nFirst, Thompson claims to have taken the &#8220;lead&#8221; in revealing the audio-taping system in Nixon&#8217;s Oval Office. That&#8217;s false.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[W]hile Thompson&#8217;s question to presidential aide Alexander Butterfield during a Watergate hearing unveiled the existence of the taping system to the outside world, it wasn&#8217;t Thompson who discovered that Nixon was taping conversations. Nor was Thompson the first to question Butterfield about the possibility.<\/p>\n<p>On July 13, 1973, Armstrong, the Democratic staffer, asked Butterfield a series of questions during a private session that led up to the revelation. He then turned the questioning over to a Republican staffer, Don Sanders, who asked Butterfield the question that led to the mention of the taping system.<\/p>\n<p>To the astonishment of everyone in the room, Butterfield admitted the taping system existed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Second, Thompson claims he pushed for release of Nixon&#8217;s tapes because he was a &#8220;hard-charging counsel.&#8221; That&#8217;s false.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Thompson, in his 1975 memoir, wrote that he believed &#8220;there would be nothing incriminating&#8221; about Nixon on the tapes, a theory he said &#8220;proved totally wrong.&#8221; [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Even as he quizzed Butterfield during the hearing, Thompson said later, he believed the tapes would exonerate Nixon, so he saw no problem in pressing for their release.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And third, Thompson was so recklessly partisan, he improperly leaked everything he could to his allies in the Nixon White House.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>When Thompson learned of Butterfield&#8217;s admission, he leaked the revelation to Nixon&#8217;s counsel, J. Fred Buzhardt .<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Even though I had no authority to act for the committee, I decided to call Fred Buzhardt at home&#8221; to tell him that the committee had learned about the taping system, Thompson wrote. &#8220;I wanted to be sure that the White House was fully aware of what was to be disclosed so that it could take appropriate action.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Armstrong said he and other Democratic staffers had long been convinced that Thompson was leaking information about the investigation to the White House. The committee, for example, had obtained a memo written by Buzhardt that Democratic staffers believed was based on information leaked by Thompson.<\/p>\n<p>Armstrong said he thought the leaks would lead to Thompson&#8217;s firing. &#8220;Any prosecutor would be upset if another member of the prosecution team was orchestrating a defense for Nixon,&#8221; said Armstrong.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And Thompson now believes his performance during this ordeal helps prove his qualifications to be president.<\/p>\n<p>If you like George W. Bush, you&#8217;ll <i>love<\/i> Fred Thompson.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fred Thompson&#8217;s political resume is a little on the thin side. He was a senator who developed a reputation for avoiding hard work; he was a high-priced corporate lobbyist, though that probably won&#8217;t help much on the campaign trail; he was an assistant U.S. Attorney almost 40 years ago; and in 1973, he was minority [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11346","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11346"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11346\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}