{"id":11516,"date":"2007-07-19T13:18:18","date_gmt":"2007-07-19T17:18:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11516.html"},"modified":"2007-07-19T13:18:18","modified_gmt":"2007-07-19T17:18:18","slug":"snow-vs-the-nie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/snow-vs-the-nie\/","title":{"rendered":"Snow vs. the NIE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Apparently, the White House press secretary we all know and tolerate is making a habit of writing mini-op-eds for USA Today. Two weeks ago, Tony Snow <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/printedition\/news\/20070705\/oppose05.art.htm\">penned<\/a> a spectacularly wrong piece on the Scooter Libby commutation, and today, he&#8217;s back at it, with <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.usatoday.com\/oped\/2007\/07\/opposing-view-v.html\">an item<\/a> disputing the National Intelligence Estimate and arguing in support of an indefinite war in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>From the very first sentence &#8212; &#8220;Politics sometimes manages to muddle the obvious&#8221; &#8212; we know we&#8217;re in for a rough ride.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We never argued that he played a role 9\/11; political opponents manufactured the claim to question the president&#8217;s integrity.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Oh, don&#8217;t go blaming us, Tony. As TP <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2007\/07\/19\/snow-oped-qaeda\/\">reminds us<\/a>, the White House&#8217;s original Iraq war resolution argued that &#8220;[m]embers of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks\u2026that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.&#8221; The document didn&#8217;t come from &#8220;political opponents&#8221;; it came from the Bush gang.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Our enemies started fighting long before 2001. Terrorists bombed &#8230; the USS Cole in 2000.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Yes, and regrettably, Bush <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11115.html\">chose not to respond<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The most astonishing argument is the claim the United States (or the Bush administration) is responsible for this terror wave. Terrorists are responsible for terror, period.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Obviously those who commit acts of terrorism are responsible for terrorism; that&#8217;s not exactly provocative. But one of the central points of the NIE is that the Bush administration, through its Iraq policies, has made the terrorist threat considerably worse. No one&#8217;s arguing that the United States is responsible for terrorism; the argument is that the administration counter-terrorism efforts have had <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11496.html\">the opposite of the intended effect<\/a>.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The al-Qaeda of 2001 no longer exists.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Actually, according to the NIE, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2170564\/\">it does exist<\/a>, it&#8217;s fundraising and recruiting are on the upswing, it&#8217;s established new training grounds in the western mountains of Pakistan, and it&#8217;s getting stronger.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ve killed or captured two-thirds of its senior leadership.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11458.html\">If only that were true<\/a>. It&#8217;s not.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Al-Qaeda doesn&#8217;t have the strength it had six years ago.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;[T]he threat &#8212; after having greatly receded over the past five years &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2170564\/\">is back in full force<\/a>. Al-Qaida has &#8216;protected or regenerated key elements&#8217; of its ability to attack the United States. It has a &#8216;safe haven&#8217; in Pakistan. Its &#8216;top leadership&#8217; and &#8216;operational lieutenants&#8217; are intact. It is cooperating more with &#8216;regional terrorist groups.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>More than anything, al-Qaeda wants the United States to leave Iraq and hand victory to the terrorists.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There&#8217;s abundant evidence that al Qaeda wants us to <i>stay<\/i> in Iraq. In early May 2007, Ayman Zawahiri &#8212; al Qaeda&#8217;s No. 2 &#8212; actually criticized efforts by the U.S. Congress to withdraw American troops from Iraq, saying a bill to set a timetable for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq would &#8220;deprive us of the opportunity to destroy the American forces which we have caught in an historic trap.&#8221; As a CAP report <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanprogress.org\/issues\/2007\/06\/pdf\/iraq_report.pdf\">explained<\/a>, &#8220;Today, Iraq is a quagmire for the United States; leaving Iraq will make it Al Qaeda&#8217;s quagmire.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>For that matter, last fall, a private letter between senior al Qaeda leaders declared their &#8220;most important&#8221; goal was &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/ari-melber\/who-cares-what-the-terror_b_32812.html\">prolonging the war<\/a>&#8221; in Iraq.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>To deny al-Qaeda victory in Iraq sends the message that terrorism will fail and democracy prevail.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Maybe Snow hasn&#8217;t heard, but al Qaeda <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mcclatchydc.com\/homepage\/story\/17471.html\">is not<\/a> the principle cause of violence in Iraq; the country&#8217;s civil war is.<\/p>\n<p>Keep in mind, before a White House spokesperson publishes a piece like this in a national newspaper, it has to be vetted by a lot of people (the political affairs office, the communications office, the press office, etc.). In other words, Snow&#8217;s piece should be the best argument(s) the White House has to offer.<\/p>\n<p>And if that&#8217;s the case, the Bush gang really hasn&#8217;t been able to think of much.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Apparently, the White House press secretary we all know and tolerate is making a habit of writing mini-op-eds for USA Today. Two weeks ago, Tony Snow penned a spectacularly wrong piece on the Scooter Libby commutation, and today, he&#8217;s back at it, with an item disputing the National Intelligence Estimate and arguing in support of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11516","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11516","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11516"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11516\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}