{"id":11560,"date":"2007-07-23T13:28:59","date_gmt":"2007-07-23T17:28:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11560.html"},"modified":"2007-07-23T13:28:59","modified_gmt":"2007-07-23T17:28:59","slug":"jeff-jacobys-assault-on-reason","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/jeff-jacobys-assault-on-reason\/","title":{"rendered":"Jeff Jacoby&#8217;s assault on reason"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jim Henley recently <a href=\"http:\/\/highclearing.com\/index.php\/archives\/2007\/07\/17\/6803\">pronounced<\/a> this Anne <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/07\/16\/AR2007071601289.html\">Applebaum piece<\/a> &#8220;the stupidest column anyone has ever written for any venue.&#8221; Given how maddening <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11484.html\">I found<\/a> Applebaum&#8217;s column, I wasn&#8217;t prepared to argue with Henley&#8217;s conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>However, that was before I read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boston.com\/news\/globe\/editorial_opinion\/oped\/articles\/2007\/07\/22\/a_teacher_with_faith_and_reason\/\">Jeff Jacoby&#8217;s latest<\/a> in yesterday&#8217;s Boston Globe. Jacoby, the Globe&#8217;s worst columnist, makes the least persuasive argument I&#8217;ve ever seen in a major American newspaper.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Did you hear about the religious fundamentalist who wanted to teach physics at Cambridge University? This would-be instructor wasn&#8217;t simply a Christian; he was so preoccupied with biblical prophecy that he wrote a book titled &#8220;Observations on the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John.&#8221; Based on his reading of Daniel, in fact, he forecast the date of the Apocalypse: no earlier than 2060. He also calculated the year the world was created. When Genesis 1:1 says &#8220;In the beginning,&#8221; he determined, it means 3988 BC.<\/p>\n<p>Not many modern universities are prepared to employ a science professor who espouses not merely &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; but out-and-out divine creation. This applicant&#8217;s writings on astronomy, for example, include these thoughts on the solar system: &#8220;This most beautiful system of sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and domination of an intelligent and powerful Being &#8230; He governs all things, and knows all things that are or can be done.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Hire somebody with such views to teach physics? At a Baptist junior college deep in the Bible Belt, maybe, but the faculty would erupt if you tried it just about anywhere else.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Then Jacoby hits us with his clever little punch-line: he&#8217;s describing Isaac Newton, who Cambridge named Lucasian Chair of Mathematics in 1668.<\/p>\n<p>Jacoby&#8217;s point seems to be that Newton celebrated an intersection between &#8220;religious inquiry and scientific investigation,&#8221; so we should do the same.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe, maybe not, but making the point by highlighting Newton&#8217;s mistaken theological beliefs is quite silly.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nJacoby thinks he&#8217;s being a shrewd observer. Cambridge, he says, wouldn&#8217;t allow a fundamentalist who interprets the Bible literally and tries to ascertain scriptural prophecies to join the science faculty. But if they turned such a person down now, they&#8217;d miss out on a scholar for the ages like Newton.<\/p>\n<p>Except this is completely wrong. Newton embraced these beliefs <i>in the 17th century<\/i>. Were he alive today, and able to see the advances of the scientific canon over the last <i>four centuries<\/i>, he obviously wouldn&#8217;t maintain the same beliefs. Jacoby, however, seems to miss the point of scientific inquiry, arguing that a genius who was wrong in 1668 necessarily means that fundamentalist beliefs might hold credence today.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.tnr.com\/blog\/the_plank?pid=127857\">James Kirchick&#8217;s take<\/a> on the column was spot-on.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Jacoby claims Newton as one of his own, historically appropriating Newton for his contemporary anti-evolution agenda, thus besmirching one of the greatest minds in Western history. He writes that it was &#8220;axiomatic that religious inquiry and scientific investigation complemented each other.&#8221; Axiomatic, indeed, in an age when denying the existence of God brought upon excommunication and other forms of state repression.<\/p>\n<p>Not for nothing did John Maynard Keynes remark, upon examining Newton&#8217;s large collection of papers relating to alchemy, that &#8220;Newton was not the first of the age of reason. He was the last of the magicians&#8230;&#8221; Indeed, the logical conclusion of Jacoby&#8217;s argument is that university physics departments should teach students how to convert lead into gold.<\/p>\n<p>Just as Abraham Lincoln was no proponent of racial equality, Newton was a man of his time. Both men deserve credit and praise for the peerless contributions they made <i>in their day<\/i>. Exalting the primitive (and no doubt once-commonly held) beliefs of a man who lived 400 years ago indicates Jacoby&#8217;s bias towards the holds of 17th century superstition as opposed to 21st century reason.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>What do you think, <a href=\"http:\/\/highclearing.com\/index.php\/archives\/2007\/07\/17\/6803\">Jim Henley<\/a>, &#8220;stupidest column anyone has ever written for any venue&#8221;?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jim Henley recently pronounced this Anne Applebaum piece &#8220;the stupidest column anyone has ever written for any venue.&#8221; Given how maddening I found Applebaum&#8217;s column, I wasn&#8217;t prepared to argue with Henley&#8217;s conclusion. However, that was before I read Jeff Jacoby&#8217;s latest in yesterday&#8217;s Boston Globe. Jacoby, the Globe&#8217;s worst columnist, makes the least persuasive [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11560"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11560\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}