{"id":11662,"date":"2007-08-01T11:18:40","date_gmt":"2007-08-01T15:18:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11662.html"},"modified":"2007-08-01T11:18:40","modified_gmt":"2007-08-01T15:18:40","slug":"a-whole-lot-of-surveillance-going-on","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/a-whole-lot-of-surveillance-going-on\/","title":{"rendered":"A whole lot of surveillance going on"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After a while, between the lies, dissembling, and stone-walling, the details can get a little confusing. Asked initially about warrantless domestic spying, Alberto Gonzales said there wasn&#8217;t any disagreement about the legality of Bush&#8217;s so-called &#8220;Terrorist Surveillance Program&#8221; at the Justice Department. We later learned there was all kinds of disagreement and Gonzales was lying.<\/p>\n<p>As part of the ongoing administration effort to clear the Attorney General of apparent perjury, the Bush gang disclosed yesterday that Gonzales was technically telling the truth because there was actually <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/07\/31\/AR2007073102137.html\">a whole lot of surveillance going on<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Bush administration&#8217;s chief intelligence official said yesterday that President Bush authorized a series of secret surveillance activities under a single executive order in late 2001. The disclosure makes clear that a controversial National Security Agency program was part of a much broader operation than the president previously described.<\/p>\n<p>The disclosure by Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence, appears to be the first time that the administration has publicly acknowledged that Bush&#8217;s order included undisclosed activities beyond the warrantless surveillance of e-mails and phone calls that Bush confirmed in December 2005.<\/p>\n<p>In a letter to Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), McConnell wrote that the executive order following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks included &#8220;a number of . . . intelligence activities&#8221; and that a name routinely used by the administration &#8212; the Terrorist Surveillance Program &#8212; applied only to &#8220;one particular aspect of these activities, and nothing more.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, is McConnell talking about eavesdropping on Americans&#8217; phone calls without a warrant? No, that&#8217;s been disclosed. Data-mining? No, that&#8217;s been disclosed, too. The new McConnell letter is describing a broader surveillance program that includes <i>even more<\/i> spying. Like what? No one outside the administration knows. (Indeed, to hear McConnell tell it, the Terrorist Surveillance Program isn&#8217;t even a program; it&#8217;s an activity within a bigger program that he can&#8217;t talk about.)<\/p>\n<p>The point may be to offer an elaborate (and cryptic) defense for an Attorney General who&#8217;s been playing fast and loose for far too long, but it&#8217;s also a sweeping admission of broader surveillance than the administration has ever been willing to acknowledge.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Kate Martin, executive director of the Center for National Security Studies, said the new disclosures show that Gonzales and other administration officials have &#8220;repeatedly misled the Congress and the American public&#8221; about the extent of NSA surveillance efforts.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They have repeatedly tried to give the false impression that the surveillance was narrow and justified,&#8221; Martin said. &#8220;Why did it take accusations of perjury before the DNI disclosed that there is indeed other, presumably broader and more questionable, surveillance?&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Good question.<\/p>\n<p>And as for Mr. Gonzales, do these new, vague revelations about broader secret surveillance exonerate our embattled Attorney General? Not so much.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), who was among a group of four Democratic senators who called last week for a perjury investigation of Gonzales, said: &#8220;The question of whether Attorney General Gonzales perjured himself looms as large now as it did before this letter.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This letter is no vindication of the attorney general,&#8221; he said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, Arlen Specter <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2007\/07\/31\/specter-wants-to-hear-from-gonzo\/\">doesn&#8217;t appear to be convinced<\/a>, either.<\/p>\n<p>So, what&#8217;s the bottom line? Gonzales&#8217; veracity remains very much in doubt, the administration&#8217;s cryptic defense is unpersuasive, and the Bush gang&#8217;s unprecedented efforts to spy on untold numbers of Americans are broader than anyone has been willing to acknowledge, but are still classified.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After a while, between the lies, dissembling, and stone-walling, the details can get a little confusing. Asked initially about warrantless domestic spying, Alberto Gonzales said there wasn&#8217;t any disagreement about the legality of Bush&#8217;s so-called &#8220;Terrorist Surveillance Program&#8221; at the Justice Department. We later learned there was all kinds of disagreement and Gonzales was lying. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11662","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11662"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11662\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11662"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}