{"id":11675,"date":"2007-08-02T10:20:38","date_gmt":"2007-08-02T14:20:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11675.html"},"modified":"2007-08-02T10:20:38","modified_gmt":"2007-08-02T14:20:38","slug":"white-house-on-obama-pakistan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/white-house-on-obama-pakistan\/","title":{"rendered":"White House on Obama, Pakistan"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Just to follow up for a moment on my earlier item, I was struck by the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2007\/08\/20070801-3.html\">White House&#8217;s response<\/a> to Barack Obama&#8217;s counter-terrorism policy with relation to Pakistan.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Q: I gather, Tony, from your answer to Martha that you don&#8217;t think very much of Barack Obama&#8217;s suggestion, he&#8217;d send U.S. troops into Pakistan to take care of those safe havens.<\/p>\n<p>TONY SNOW: Well, let me just say we think that our approach to Pakistan is one that not only respects the sovereignty of Pakistan as a sovereign government, but is also designed to work in a way where we are working in cooperation with the local government. So we think that our policy and our approach is the right one.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But that&#8217;s part of the problem here; the Bush administration doesn&#8217;t have a consistent policy. On the one hand, the president has said emphatically that he <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2006\/09\/20060915-2.html\">wouldn&#8217;t pursue<\/a> terrorists inside Pakistani borders.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Q Thank you, Mr. President. Earlier this week, you told a group of journalists that you thought the idea of sending special forces to Pakistan to hunt down bin Laden was a strategy that would not work. Now, recently you&#8217;ve also &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>THE PRESIDENT: Because, first of all, Pakistan is a sovereign nation.<\/p>\n<p>Q Well, recently you&#8217;ve also described bin Laden as a sort of modern day Hitler or Mussolini. And I&#8217;m wondering why, if you can explain why you think it&#8217;s a bad idea to send more resources to hunt down bin Laden, wherever he is?<\/p>\n<p>THE PRESIDENT: We are, Richard. Thank you. Thanks for asking the question. They were asking me about somebody&#8217;s report, well, special forces here &#8212; Pakistan &#8212; if he is in Pakistan, as this person thought he might be, who is asking the question &#8212; Pakistan is a sovereign nation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Security Advisor Frances Fragos Townsend said the exact opposite on Fox News two weeks ago.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>WALLACE: If our enemies are regenerating their safe haven in Pakistan, under the Bush doctrine of preemptive military action to take out any threat, why aren&#8217;t we doing everything we can &#8212; special operations forces, pilotless drones &#8212; why aren&#8217;t we doing everything we can to take out that safe haven?<\/p>\n<p>TOWNSEND: [L]et&#8217;s remember that the federally administrated tribal area is an area of Pakistan that&#8217;s never seen the writ of the Pakistani government. It&#8217;s never extended that far. President Musharraf has got over 80,000 Pakistani military troops in the FATA and working with us they&#8217;ve sustained hundreds of casualties in this fight. We&#8217;re working with them, but the president has been clear. Job number one is to protect the American people, and there are no options that are off the table.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, the White House policy is that we wouldn&#8217;t send troops to attack terrorists inside Pakistani borders except for those times when we send troops to attack terrorists inside Pakistani borders.<\/p>\n<p>Snow said the Bush gang&#8217;s approach is the &#8220;right one.&#8221; Here&#8217;s a follow up: which approach would that be?<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, it&#8217;s also worth noting that the White House talking points say that al Qaeda has gotten stronger in recent years because Pakistan allowed the terrorist network to establish a new base. As Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell recently said <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/19850951\/print\/1\/displaymode\/1098\/\">on Meet The Press<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;In Pakistan, where they&#8217;re enjoying a safe haven, the government of Pakistan chose to try a political solution. The political solution meant a peace treaty with a region that&#8217;s never been governed &#8212; not governed from the outside, not governed by Pakistan.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The opposite occurred. Instead of pushing al-Qaeda out, the people who live in these federally- administered tribal areas, rather than pushing al-Qaeda out, they made a safe haven for training and recruiting. And so, in that period of time, al-Qaeda has been able to regain some of its momentum.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And which wacky group of people endorsed the Pakistani peace treaty? That would be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.liberaloasis.com\/2007\/07\/how_did_that_safe_haven_get_th.php\">the Bush White House<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Before Snow condemns Democratic policies, maybe he can help explain his boss&#8217; policy?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Just to follow up for a moment on my earlier item, I was struck by the White House&#8217;s response to Barack Obama&#8217;s counter-terrorism policy with relation to Pakistan. Q: I gather, Tony, from your answer to Martha that you don&#8217;t think very much of Barack Obama&#8217;s suggestion, he&#8217;d send U.S. troops into Pakistan to take [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11675\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}