{"id":1221,"date":"2004-02-09T14:55:55","date_gmt":"2004-02-09T19:55:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/1221.html"},"modified":"2004-02-09T14:55:55","modified_gmt":"2004-02-09T19:55:55","slug":"war-under-false-pretenses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/war-under-false-pretenses\/","title":{"rendered":"War under &#8216;false pretenses&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over the last couple of days, I&#8217;ve noticed that the president has treated the WMD-in-Iraq question a little differently than he did before David Kay&#8217;s now-infamous testimony. Specifically, Bush now seems willing to acknowledge &#8212; in the most passive, oblique way imaginable &#8212; that the intelligence he used to justify the invasion was wrong.<\/p>\n<p>On Friday, for example, Bush, in announcing his &#8220;independent&#8221; commission to investigate intelligence failures, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2004\/02\/20040206-3.html\">said the following<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Last week, our former chief weapons inspector, David Kay, reported that Saddam Hussein&#8217;s regime had weapons programs and activities in violation of United Nations Security Council resolutions and was a gathering threat to the world. Dr. Kay also stated that some pre-war intelligence assessments by America and other nations about Iraq&#8217;s weapons stockpiles have not been confirmed. We are determined to figure out why.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That&#8217;s pretty close Bush admitting he was wrong. The information he relied on has &#8220;not been confirmed.&#8221; Fine.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday, he came even closer <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/4179618\">on Meet the Press<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Russert: The night you took the country to war, March 17th, you said this:  &#8220;Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Bush: Right.<\/p>\n<p>Russert: That apparently is not the case.<\/p>\n<p>Bush: Correct.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That &#8220;correct&#8221; seems to confirm what everyone&#8217;s been saying: that Bush&#8217;s claims about Iraq before the war were wrong.<\/p>\n<p>And with this in mind, haven&#8217;t we now pretty much confirmed that the war was waged under false pretenses?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nI don&#8217;t want to get into a semantics argument (or as Bush calls them, &#8220;word contests&#8221;), but if we invaded Iraq because of its WMD, and Bush is now wiling to concede these claims about WMD were wrong, isn&#8217;t this pretty much the <i>definition<\/i> of going to war under false pretenses?<\/p>\n<p>Yet, when Russert asked him if we waged war under false pretenses, Bush rejected the notion, insisting that he &#8220;expected to find these weapons.&#8221; Well, I&#8217;m sure he did, but that&#8217;s not really the point. What the president expected has only the most tangential connection to what he told the world was going to happen. <\/p>\n<p>Bush may have &#8220;expected&#8221; a different result, but that doesn&#8217;t make his beliefs any less wrong. As a factual matter, if Bush is willing to concede now that his own WMD claims were false, then how, logically, can he deny that the war was waged under false pretenses?<\/p>\n<p>Maybe Bush misunderstood the question.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over the last couple of days, I&#8217;ve noticed that the president has treated the WMD-in-Iraq question a little differently than he did before David Kay&#8217;s now-infamous testimony. Specifically, Bush now seems willing to acknowledge &#8212; in the most passive, oblique way imaginable &#8212; that the intelligence he used to justify the invasion was wrong. On [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}