{"id":1278,"date":"2004-02-19T11:58:13","date_gmt":"2004-02-19T16:58:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/1278.html"},"modified":"2004-02-19T11:58:13","modified_gmt":"2004-02-19T16:58:13","slug":"the-odd-conditions-that-have-made-civil-unions-the-new-middle-ground","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/the-odd-conditions-that-have-made-civil-unions-the-new-middle-ground\/","title":{"rendered":"The odd conditions that have made civil unions the new middle ground"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I remember when Howard Dean first started running for president in 2002, his support for Vermont&#8217;s civil unions law was supposed to be an almost disqualifying part of his record. Dean refused to back gay marriage, but his signature on the state&#8217;s civil unions bill &#8212; which came, effectively, under court order &#8212; allegedly put Dean far outside the national mainstream.<\/p>\n<p>Considering the current political landscape, I can&#8217;t help but find this hilarious.<\/p>\n<p>After the Massachusetts Supreme Court cleared the way for gay marriage in its state, compounded by San Francisco&#8217;s move to start issuing marriage licenses to gay couples, the debate has shifted dramatically in just a couple of months. And while the public may remain, shall we say, concerned about state-sanctioned gay marriages, I actually think the debate has moved the goal posts in a helpful way.<\/p>\n<p>Oddly enough, civil unions &#8212; up until recently a wildly controversial move on behalf of gay rights &#8212; are now seen as a reasonable compromise embraced by moderates. That&#8217;s an incredibly positive development.<\/p>\n<p>Conservatives want a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriages. The public, in general, seems hesitant, worried that this might be overly aggressive. Liberals, meanwhile, want gay marriage. The public, again, seems wary.<\/p>\n<p>This is actually great news for those of us who&#8217;d like to see greater legal protections extended to the gay community. The result may be widespread acceptance of civil unions as a reasonable extension of legal protections.<\/p>\n<p>Was this part of the plan all along? Did I miss the memo?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIn case you&#8217;re new to the debate, civil unions for same-sex couples are legally recognized relationships. Couples in civil unions, though not legally &#8220;married,&#8221; enjoy rights to pensions, health insurance, medical leave, bereavement leave, hospital visitation, and survivor benefits, just as married straight couples enjoy. At its core, the difference between the two is a semantic one, not a legal one.<\/p>\n<p>Considering the political climate in this country, I&#8217;ve long considered civil unions a dramatic step forward on civil rights. Conservatives, predictably, have voiced strong opposition.<\/p>\n<p>But with the new debate over actual gay marriages, civil unions have become a fall-back stance for moderates! If you think a constitutional amendment goes too far, but aren&#8217;t ready to embrace gay marriage, civil unions is &#8212; get this &#8212; a compromise!<\/p>\n<p>Ideally, gay marriage wouldn&#8217;t be as controversial as it is. When two people want to commit themselves to a stable, long-term family, it&#8217;s a positive development that the nation&#8217;s law should encourage, not forbid.<\/p>\n<p>My concern is that the drive for gay marriage may prompt a backlash that could help conservatives tarnish the Constitution with bigotry.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s why I find the current debate so encouraging. It&#8217;s like asking for too much money in a commercial transaction, knowing that you&#8217;d be happy with somewhat less. <\/p>\n<p>I believe gay marriage should be legal, but I&#8217;ll gladly accept civil unions as the new &#8220;middle-ground.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I remember when Howard Dean first started running for president in 2002, his support for Vermont&#8217;s civil unions law was supposed to be an almost disqualifying part of his record. Dean refused to back gay marriage, but his signature on the state&#8217;s civil unions bill &#8212; which came, effectively, under court order &#8212; allegedly put [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1278\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}