{"id":12786,"date":"2007-09-06T10:10:41","date_gmt":"2007-09-06T14:10:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/12786.html"},"modified":"2007-09-06T10:10:41","modified_gmt":"2007-09-06T14:10:41","slug":"craigs-conundrum-day-10","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/craigs-conundrum-day-10\/","title":{"rendered":"Craig&#8217;s conundrum &#8212; Day 10"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So, what&#8217;s the latest from Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho)? Keeping up is getting tricky, but the senator is apparently convinced that he can &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.usnews.com\/usnews\/politics\/bulletin\/bulletin_070906.htm\">clear his name<\/a>.&#8221; The Senate Ethics Committee, however, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/washington\/2007-09-04-craig-senate-stay_N.htm\">isn&#8217;t anxious to help<\/a> in that endeavor.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Senate Ethics committee late Wednesday rejected Sen. Larry Craig&#8217;s request to drop ethics charges against him, saying the committee will review the complaint against him pending any resignation. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Lawyers for Craig had asked the Senate ethics committee Wednesday to reject a complaint based on the Idaho Republican&#8217;s guilty plea in June stemming from a police undercover operation in an airport men&#8217;s room, saying the events were &#8220;wholly unrelated&#8221; to official duties.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Assertion of jurisdiction over this matter by the committee would be literally unprecedented and would create deleterious consequences for the Senate as a whole,&#8221; the lawyers wrote.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think that&#8217;s a fairly persuasive argument, but the Senate Ethics Committee disagreed. It&#8217;s moving forward with its plans to conduct a thorough probe, stemming from Craig&#8217;s guilty plea to disorderly conduct in June.<\/p>\n<p>What will be interesting is to see what the Committee does, if anything, should Craig reverse the guilty plea. I&#8217;m not an expert in Senate ethics procedures, but can the committee launch an investigation of a private misdemeanor that was thrown out of court? I kind of doubt it.<\/p>\n<p>Now, there was also some question yesterday about Craig&#8217;s post-9\/30 future. If he somehow manages to make legal progress on the Minneapolis charge, is it possible that Craig <a href=\"http:\/\/tpmelectioncentral.com\/2007\/09\/did_mcconnell_and_craig_make_deal_nixing_him_running_for_reelection.php\">reached some kind of agreement<\/a> with the Republican leadership about retiring at the end of his term? Apparently so.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rollcall.com\/issues\/53_22\/news\/19861-1.html\">Roll Call reports<\/a> that Craig is fighting to save face and return to his Senate seat, but he has no illusions about his career beyond this term.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In the unlikely event that Craig does finish his third term, [Craig spokesman Dan Whiting] said Craig would not run for re-election in 2008, leaving an open Senate seat in a solid Republican state that the GOP should have no trouble retaining.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>With that, Craig seems to have settled on a straightforward message: he just wants to end his career with a little dignity. When you&#8217;re caught hitting on an undercover cop in an airport bathroom, that&#8217;s kind of tricky, but Craig clearly realizes that the legal case against him is very thin, and without it, he shouldn&#8217;t be forced from his Senate seat.<\/p>\n<p>Other Craig-related news from this morning&#8217;s headlines:<\/p>\n<p>* Republican Senate leaders are &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/09\/06\/us\/06craig.html?ex=1346731200&#038;en=ed4d9edbf49c664c&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">infuriated<\/a>&#8221; by Craig&#8217;s latest offensive, because they &#8220;thought they had contained the political damage from his case.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* A spokesperson for Idaho Gov. C. L. Otter (R) said, &#8220;We are working toward a replacement. We are working with the senator&#8217;s staff toward what we assume is a Sept. 30 date. What Larry has got going on outside of that, you&#8217;re going to have to talk to Larry about, but we are proceeding based on what he said at his Saturday event.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* The White House <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/09\/05\/AR2007090502376.html\">still wants<\/a> Craig to go away.<\/p>\n<p>* Craig&#8217;s only outspoken backer is his home-state colleague, Sen. Michael D. Crapo (R), who told reporters: &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/09\/05\/AR2007090502376.html\">I&#8217;ll support whatever Larry does<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/09\/05\/AR2007090502376.html\">WaPo<\/a>: &#8220;According to legal analysts, a full public trial is about the best outcome Craig could hope for in his legal case. Minneapolis criminal defense lawyer Jon M. Hopeman said it is &#8216;almost impossible&#8217; to withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing without showing that &#8216;the person did not understand the nature of the legal proceeding.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* One GOP aide <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/leading-the-news\/gop-uproar-over-craig-2007-09-06.html\">summed up<\/a> the party&#8217;s sentiment: &#8220;Craig is the only person who doesn&#8217;t know he&#8217;s done.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Stay tuned.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So, what&#8217;s the latest from Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho)? Keeping up is getting tricky, but the senator is apparently convinced that he can &#8220;clear his name.&#8221; The Senate Ethics Committee, however, isn&#8217;t anxious to help in that endeavor. The Senate Ethics committee late Wednesday rejected Sen. Larry Craig&#8217;s request to drop ethics charges against him, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12786","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12786","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12786"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12786\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12786"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12786"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12786"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}