{"id":13274,"date":"2007-10-18T08:15:10","date_gmt":"2007-10-18T12:15:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/13274.html"},"modified":"2007-10-18T08:15:10","modified_gmt":"2007-10-18T12:15:10","slug":"how-a-bill-doesnt-become-a-law-101","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/how-a-bill-doesnt-become-a-law-101\/","title":{"rendered":"How a Bill Doesn&#8217;t Become a Law 101"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After weeks of wrangling, positioning, and debate, the House was poised yesterday afternoon to vote on the RESTORE Act, a measure to improve the FISA law that corrects some of the mistakes of a similar bill from August. It didn&#8217;t go well &#8212; House Dems <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/10\/18\/washington\/18nsa.html?ref=todayspaper\">had to pull the bill<\/a> from the floor after GOP leaders reminded everyone why they&#8217;re not to be taken seriously on matters of public policy.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>At the start of the day, Democrats were confident that the measure would gain approval in the House despite a veto threat from President Bush. But after an afternoon of partisan sniping, Democratic leaders put off that vote because of a competing measure from Republicans that on its face asked lawmakers to declare where they stood on stopping Osama bin Laden from attacking the United States again.<\/p>\n<p>The Republican measure declared that nothing in the broader bill should be construed as prohibiting intelligence officials from conducting the surveillance needed to prevent Mr. bin Laden or Al Qaeda &#8220;from attacking the United States.&#8221; Had it passed, it threatened to derail the Democratic measure altogether.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats denounced the Republicans&#8217; poison pill on Mr. bin Laden as a cynical political ploy and &#8220;a cheap shot.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In reality, it wasn&#8217;t a &#8220;cheap&#8221; shot; it was a <i>stupid<\/i> shot.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), a member of the Republican leadership, introduced an amendment to &#8220;clarify&#8221; that nothing in the bill &#8220;shall be construed to prohibit the intelligence community from conducting surveillance needed to prevent Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, or any other foreign terrorist organization&#8230;from attacking the United States or any United States person.&#8221; The amendment lacked any and all substance &#8212; for the purposes of legislation, Cantor&#8217;s measure was a childish little game.<\/p>\n<p>But it was a painful reminder that legislating like a child can sometimes be successful.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nCantor&#8217;s shallow amendment was ridiculous for a couple of reasons. First, it was obviously intended to scuttle the legislation. Lawmakers didn&#8217;t want to be in a position of voting for an amendment, no matter how ridiculous, that might be construed as &#8220;weak&#8221; on terrorism. But if the amendment passed, procedurally, it would send the entire bill back to committee and delay the process considerably.<\/p>\n<p>Second, Cantor&#8217;s little game was redundant &#8212; the legislation already <a href=\"http:\/\/tpmelectioncentral.com\/2007\/10\/fisa_bill_already_allowed_unfettered_evesdropping_to_prevent_terror_attack_dems_say.php\">included grown-up language<\/a> that achieved the same goal.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[I]t turns out that the FISA legislation may already accomplish what Cantor said he wanted to accomplish with his amendment &#8212; that is, it has provisions in it that allow the intelligence community to do whatever surveillance they need in the event of an imminent terror attack.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what Dem Rep. Jerrold Nadler had to say in his recent statement announcing his backing of the bill: &#8220;It also includes emergency provisions, including the ability to get a warrant after the fact, to ensure that the government will never have to stop listening to a suspected terrorist plotting an attack.&#8221; [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Dem House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer has just put out a statement reiterating this point, accusing the GOP of pushing an amendment that is &#8220;proposing language already provided in the bill.&#8221; And the Associated Press is equally unequivocal, saying that the bill &#8220;allows the unfettered surveillance of such groups.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, Cantor and the GOP were just being stupid, on purpose. As my friend <a href=\"http:\/\/www.anonymousliberal.com\/2007\/10\/how-to-legislate-like-seven-year-old.html\">A.L. put it<\/a>, &#8220;The Republicans might as well have offered an amendment &#8216;clarifying&#8217; that &#8216;anyone who votes against this amendment is gay.&#8217; That&#8217;s about the level of maturity we&#8217;re talking about here. It&#8217;s the kind of stuff that would embarrass most seven-year-olds.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But just to add insult to injury, the Republicans followed up with child-like bravado.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;House Democrats have pulled the FISA bill,&#8221; Cantor said. &#8220;They are so desperately against allowing our intelligence agencies to fight OBL and AQ, that they pulled the entire bill to prevent a vote.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Got that? According to a House Republican leader, Democrats are treasonous, and pulled a surveillance bill in order to protect terrorists.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;re dealing with children who are running a major political party in the House of Representatives. It&#8217;s painful to watch, in part because the children think they&#8217;re clever.<\/p>\n<p>Complicating matters, word this morning is that senators and the White House <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/10\/17\/AR2007101702438.html\">struck a deal<\/a> that would pass a revised FISA bill. Bush likes it, and it includes telecom immunity. More on that later.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After weeks of wrangling, positioning, and debate, the House was poised yesterday afternoon to vote on the RESTORE Act, a measure to improve the FISA law that corrects some of the mistakes of a similar bill from August. It didn&#8217;t go well &#8212; House Dems had to pull the bill from the floor after GOP [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13274\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}