{"id":13278,"date":"2007-10-18T11:10:38","date_gmt":"2007-10-18T15:10:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/13278.html"},"modified":"2007-10-18T11:10:38","modified_gmt":"2007-10-18T15:10:38","slug":"the-callous-limits-of-the-pro-life-crowd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/the-callous-limits-of-the-pro-life-crowd\/","title":{"rendered":"The callous limits of the &#8216;pro-life&#8217; crowd"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An early version of the State Children&#8217;s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP) bill included Medicare provisions that some conservatives believed might lead to government-sponsored euthanasia. The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) actively opposed that bill, and told lawmakers it would count towards the group&#8217;s annual scorecard.<\/p>\n<p>But Dems agreed to drop the provision, leading to a &#8220;clean&#8221; S-CHIP bill that would help millions of children, parents, and pregnant women. Again, the National Right to Life Committee balked. Yesterday, 10 pro-life House Dems <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/leading-the-news\/dems-lash-out-at-activist-group-on-abortion-issue-2007-10-17.html\">asked why<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;I couldn&#8217;t believe it,&#8221; said Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) in an interview with The Hill. &#8220;It absolutely didn&#8217;t make sense to my constituents, either.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Those provisions were stripped, but the NRLC has not swung in favor of the SCHIP bill that Congress passed and President Bush vetoed. This has irked some of the group&#8217;s typical allies, who viewed its campaign as unfair.<\/p>\n<p>Posing a rhetorical question to the NRLC, Ryan asked: &#8220;Why aren&#8217;t you supporting it now? Are you really concerned with protecting life or are you concerned with protecting the Bush administration?&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think we know the answer to that one.<\/p>\n<p>The S-CHIP override vote is going to be close, though it appears the majority will come a few votes shy of the two-thirds threshold. The NRLC&#8217;s backing could help push a few conservatives who are on the fence.<\/p>\n<p>But the group apparently isn&#8217;t quite as &#8220;pro-life&#8221; as they claim.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIt&#8217;s worth noting that some religious groups, including abortion opponents, have been doing their due diligence. Catholics United, for example, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.catholics-united.org\/schip-ads\">launched a radio ad campaign<\/a> on S-CHIP last week.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Building a true culture of life requires public policies that promote the welfare of the most vulnerable,&#8221; said Chris Korzen, executive director of Catholics United. &#8220;At the heart of the Christian faith is a deep and abiding concern for the need of others. Pro-life Christians who serve in Congress should honor this commitment by supporting health care for poor children.&#8221; [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>The script for the radio commercial reads: &#8220;I&#8217;m the mother of three children, and I&#8217;m pro-life. I believe that protecting the lives our children must be our nation&#8217;s number one moral priority. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m concerned that Congressman X says he&#8217;s pro-life but votes against health care for poor children. That&#8217;s not pro-life. That&#8217;s not pro-family. Tell Congressman X to vote for health care for children. Call him today at XXXX, that&#8217;s XXXXX.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Catholic Charities USA, and the Catholic Health Association have all urged Congress and President Bush to support SCHIP.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And yet, there&#8217;s the National Right to Life Committee. Asked for the group&#8217;s reaction, Douglas Johnson, NRLC&#8217;s legislative director, told The Hill, &#8220;There&#8217;s nothing there [in the SCHIP bill] for us to really grab onto.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Something to remember the next time this crowd talks about being &#8220;pro-family.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An early version of the State Children&#8217;s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP) bill included Medicare provisions that some conservatives believed might lead to government-sponsored euthanasia. The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) actively opposed that bill, and told lawmakers it would count towards the group&#8217;s annual scorecard. But Dems agreed to drop the provision, leading to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13278\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}