{"id":13319,"date":"2007-10-22T11:15:31","date_gmt":"2007-10-22T15:15:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/13319.html"},"modified":"2007-10-22T11:15:31","modified_gmt":"2007-10-22T15:15:31","slug":"gop-candidates-endorse-bushs-failed-social-security-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/gop-candidates-endorse-bushs-failed-social-security-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"GOP candidates endorse Bush&#8217;s failed Social Security plan"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Republicans in general have been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/11119.html\">struggling<\/a> lately with memory trouble, but I find it hard to imagine that the GOP presidential field has completely forgotten about 2005. It wasn&#8217;t that long ago.<\/p>\n<p>Shortly after his second inaugural, the president boasted of having &#8220;political capital,&#8221; which he intended to invest in privatizing Social Security. Bush figured this was his best shot &#8212; there was a Republican House, Republican Senate, and his approval rating was still above 50%. Everything was how Bush and his team wanted it.<\/p>\n<p>And then the president actually started talking about his ideas to privatize the Social Security system. The more Americans heard about the plan, the more they hated it. After a few months of hearing Bush barnstorm the nation to sell his idea, Americans supported his handling of Social Security <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pollingreport.com\/social.htm\">even less<\/a> than his handling of Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>Bush&#8217;s overall poll numbers quickly collapsed, and never recovered. Even the most sycophantic of Republicans quickly realized that Bush&#8217;s Social Security policy was poison to be avoided at all costs. Given the public&#8217;s response, a candidate would have to be a blithering fool to embrace a plan that everyone hated.<\/p>\n<p>And yet, there was the Republican field <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/10\/21\/us\/politics\/21debate-transcript.html\">last night<\/a>, pretending that 2005 never happened, and vowing to pick up where Bush left off on Social Security.<\/p>\n<p>If there&#8217;s any logic to this, it&#8217;s hiding well.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nFred Thompson got things started, arguing (falsely) that Social Security is going &#8220;bankrupt,&#8221; and proposing steep benefit cuts to protect the system.<\/p>\n<p>Practically every other candidate recommended Bush&#8217;s approach to the issue.<\/p>\n<p>* Rudy Giuliani: &#8220;OK. I think the reality is that we have to deal with Social Security. The first thing we have to do is get a consensus behind private accounts if we&#8217;re going to change it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* Mitt Romney: &#8220;[T]he president said let&#8217;s have private accounts and take that surplus money that&#8217;s being gathered now in Social Security and put that into private accounts. That works.&#8221; Asked how he would succeed where Bush failed, Romney added, &#8220;Well, you know, I will learn from his experience and from my own.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* Mike Huckabee: &#8220;The president had the right idea, but he used the wrong word. When he used the word privatization, it scared the daylights out of a lot of people because&#8230;they&#8217;re thinking Enron and WorldCom, and that that&#8217;s where their money would go. The right word is &#8216;personalization.&#8217; Empower individuals to have a greater say over their money.&#8221; (Yes, to Huckabee, Bush&#8217;s scheme would have worked, were it not for semantics.)<\/p>\n<p>* Ron Paul: &#8220;[W]e need to allow the young people to just flat out get out of the system. Because, I tell you what, if you have the government managing these accounts, it&#8217;s not going to work.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* John McCain: &#8220;[Y]ou have to got to the American people and say we don&#8217;t &#8212; we won&#8217;t raise your taxes. We need personal savings accounts, but we got to fix this system.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So, most of the Republican candidates believe they can win the presidency, on a platform that includes promising to follow Bush&#8217;s model on Social Security.<\/p>\n<p>Sounds good to me.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Republicans in general have been struggling lately with memory trouble, but I find it hard to imagine that the GOP presidential field has completely forgotten about 2005. It wasn&#8217;t that long ago. Shortly after his second inaugural, the president boasted of having &#8220;political capital,&#8221; which he intended to invest in privatizing Social Security. Bush figured [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13319"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13319\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}