{"id":13368,"date":"2007-10-26T09:15:03","date_gmt":"2007-10-26T13:15:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/13368.html"},"modified":"2007-10-26T09:15:03","modified_gmt":"2007-10-26T13:15:03","slug":"the-chain-email-gang","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/the-chain-email-gang\/","title":{"rendered":"The chain (email) gang"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have some conservative relatives &#8212; I suspect everyone does &#8212; who forward on bizarre right-wing chain emails. The content usually ranges from the absurd to the offensive, but the common thread is always the same: the emails are as conservative as they are wrong. (I used to write back, explaining why the chain email is wrong, but that only seemed to encourage the misguided relatives.)<\/p>\n<p>What I didn&#8217;t fully appreciate, until reading Chris Hayes&#8217; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thenation.com\/docprint.mhtml?i=20071112&#038;s=hayes\">terrific new article<\/a> in The Nation, is that this is something of a cottage industry for the right these days.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[T]he e-mail forward doesn&#8217;t fit into our existing model of the right-wing noise machine&#8217;s structure (hierarchical) or its approach (broadcast). It is, instead, organic and peer-to-peer&#8230;. The smear forward has its roots in two distinct forms of Internet-age communication. First, there&#8217;s the electronically disseminated urban legend (&#8220;Help find this missing child!&#8221;; &#8220;Bill Gates is going to pay people for every e-mail they send!&#8221;), which has been a staple of the Internet since the mid- &#8217;90s. Then there&#8217;s the surreal genre of right-wing e-mail forwards. These range from creepy rage-filled quasi-fascist invocations (&#8220;The next time you see an adult talking&#8230;during the playing of the National Anthem&#8211;kick their ass&#8221;) to treacly aphorisms of patriotic\/religious uplift (&#8220;remember only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ&#8230;and the American Soldier&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>For a certain kind of conservative, these e-mails, along with talk-radio, are an informational staple, a means of getting the real stories that the mainstream media ignore&#8230;. Mike D&#8217;Asto, a 29-year-old assistant cameraman living in New York, received so many forwards from his conservative father he started a blog called MyRightWingDad.net, where he shares them with other unwitting recipients. &#8220;I suddenly have connected to all these people who receive these right-wing forwards from their brothers-in-law,&#8221; D&#8217;Asto told me. &#8220;Surprisingly, a very large number of people receive these.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And that, of course, is the problem.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And what a problem it is. It&#8217;s difficult enough to push back against nonsense disseminated by Fox News or Limbaugh, but manufactured right-wing gossip spread via email is even more nefarious.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thenation.com\/docprint.mhtml?i=20071112&#038;s=hayes\">Hayes&#8217; whole article is definitely worth reading<\/a>, but I just wanted to highlight a couple of points. First, it&#8217;s not a bipartisan problem.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>From the beginning, the vast majority of these Internet-disseminated rumors have come from the right. (Snopes lists about fifty e-mails about George W. Bush, split evenly between adulatory accounts of him saluting wounded soldiers or witnessing to a wayward teenager, and accounts of real and invented malapropisms. In contrast, every single one of the twenty-two e-mails about John Kerry is negative.) For conservatives, these e-mails neatly reinforce preconceptions, bending the facts of the world in line with their ideological framework: liberals, immigrants, hippies and celebrities are always the enemy; soldiers and conservatives, the besieged heroes. The stories of the former&#8217;s perfidy and the latter&#8217;s heroism are, of course, never told by the liberal media. So it&#8217;s left to the conservative underground to get the truth out. And since the general story and the roles stay the same, often the actual characters are interchangeable.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A lot of the chain letters that were accusing Al Gore of things in 2000 were recycled in 2004 and changed to Kerry,&#8221; says John Ratliff, who runs a site called BreakTheChain.org, which, like Snopes, devotes itself to debunking chain e-mails. One e-mail falsely described a Senate committee hearing in the 1980s where Oliver North offered an impassioned Cassandra-like warning about the threat of Osama bin Laden, only to be dismissed by a condescending Democratic senator. Originally it was Al Gore who played the role of the senator, but by 2004 it had changed to John Kerry. &#8220;You just plug in your political front-runner du jour,&#8221; Ratliff says.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And second, remember the chain email accusing Barack Obama of being <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/1007\/6314.html\">a secret Muslim<\/a>? Hayes digs into that, too, and highlights the bogus attack&#8217;s origin.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>On August 10, 2004, just two weeks after Obama had given his much-heralded keynote speech at the DNC in Boston, a perennial Republican Senate candidate and self-described &#8220;independent contrarian columnist&#8221; named Andy Martin issued a press release. In it, he announced a press conference in which he would expose Obama for having &#8220;lied to the American people&#8221; and &#8220;misrepresent[ed] his own heritage.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Martin raised all kinds of strange allegations about Obama but focused on him attempting to hide his Muslim past. &#8220;It may well be that his concealment is meant to endanger Israel,&#8221; read Martin&#8217;s statement. &#8220;His Muslim religion would obviously raise serious questions in many Jewish circles where Obama now enjoys support.&#8221; [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Within a few days of Martin&#8217;s press conference, the conservative site Free Republic had picked it up, attracting a long comment thread, but after that small blip the specious &#8220;questions&#8221; about Obama&#8217;s background disappeared. Then, in the fall of 2006, as word got out that Obama was considering a presidential run, murmurs on the Internet resumed. In October a conservative blog called Infidel Bloggers Alliance reposted the Andy Martin press release under the title &#8220;Is Barack Obama Lying About His Life Story?&#8221; A few days later the online RumorMillNews also reposted the Andy Martin press release in response to a reader&#8217;s inquiry about whether Obama was a Muslim. Then in December fringe right-wing activist Ted Sampley posted a column on the web raising the possibility that Obama was a secret Muslim. Sampley, who co-founded Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry and once accused John McCain of having been a KGB asset, quoted heavily from Martin&#8217;s original press release. &#8220;When Obama was six,&#8221; Sampley wrote, &#8220;his mother, an atheist, married Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian Muslim, and moved to Jakarta, Indonesia&#8230;. Soetoro enrolled his stepson in one of Jakarta&#8217;s Muslim Wahabbi schools. Wahabbism is the radical teaching that created the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad on the rest of the world.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Jim Kennedy, a former communications director for Hillary Clinton, explained, &#8220;Once [the charges] are out in the ether, they are very hard to combat. It&#8217;s very unlike a traditional media, newspaper or TV show, or even a blog, which at least has a fixed point of reference. You know they&#8217;re traveling far and wide, but there&#8217;s no way to rebut them with all the people that have seen them.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s apparently just the way the right-wing rumor mill likes it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have some conservative relatives &#8212; I suspect everyone does &#8212; who forward on bizarre right-wing chain emails. The content usually ranges from the absurd to the offensive, but the common thread is always the same: the emails are as conservative as they are wrong. (I used to write back, explaining why the chain email [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13368\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}