{"id":13763,"date":"2007-11-30T11:00:59","date_gmt":"2007-11-30T16:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/13763.html"},"modified":"2007-11-30T11:00:59","modified_gmt":"2007-11-30T16:00:59","slug":"did-mark-halperin-follow-through-on-his-mea-culpa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/did-mark-halperin-follow-through-on-his-mea-culpa\/","title":{"rendered":"Did Mark Halperin follow through on his mea culpa?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Less than a week ago, Time magazine&#8217;s Mark Halperin raised a quite a few eyebrows in the world of political journalism with a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/11\/25\/opinion\/25halperin.html\">startling NYT op-ed<\/a>. Halperin, best known for his work at ABC News (&#8220;The Note&#8221; was his creation) before becoming a senior political analyst for Time, argued that there are fundamental problems with the way reporters cover a presidential campaign.<\/p>\n<p>Putting aside the messenger, the broader message was largely right:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Our political and media culture reflects and drives an obsession with who is <i>going to<\/i> win, rather than who <i>should<\/i> win.<\/p>\n<p>For most of my time covering presidential elections, I shared the view that there was a direct correlation between the skills needed to be a great candidate and a great president. The chaotic and demanding requirements of running for president, I felt, were a perfect test for the toughest job in the world.<\/p>\n<p>But now I think I was wrong. The &#8220;campaigner equals leader&#8221; formula that inspired me and so many others in the news media is flawed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Aside from a few <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/13708.html\">errors of fact and judgment<\/a>, Halperin&#8217;s criticism of the horse-race nature of the process was welcome. I don&#8217;t know what took him so long to reach the conclusion that most of us recognized years ago, but why be petty? As Yglesias <a href=\"http:\/\/matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com\/archives\/2007\/11\/ill_just_say_hes_right_and_lea.php\">concluded<\/a>, &#8220;[I]f Halperin wants to come over to the side of light, I think we should take him.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The trick, of course, would be the follow-through. Halperin argued that the media should help make the process more meaningful and substantive, but as Kevin Drum <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/archives\/individual\/2007_11\/012566.php\">noted<\/a>, &#8220;I think I&#8217;ll wait to see if he actually changes the way he covers this year&#8217;s campaign.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Good idea. As it turns out, Halperin has written two pieces for publication this week, so we can already evaluate whether he&#8217;s taking his own advice. (I&#8217;ll give you a hint: he&#8217;s not.)<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nToday, for example, Time readers can read a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/printout\/0,8816,1687526,00.html\">600-word piece<\/a> on why Oprah Winfrey may not help Barack Obama&#8217;s campaign strategy in early primary and caucus states.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>To win the Democratic nomination for President, Barack Obama still needs the same thing he has needed all along &#8212; for voters to see him as ready to be commander in chief by January 2009. So now the question is: Will appearing at weekend campaign rallies with Oprah Winfrey help him achieve that goal?<\/p>\n<p>Mark me down as more than a bit skeptical.<\/p>\n<p>Winfrey&#8217;s endorsement &#8212; and her announcement that she will appear with Obama at campaign events in Iowa, South Carolina, and New Hampshire on December 8 and 9 &#8212; helps bring the following four things to Obama: campaign cash, celebrity, excitement and big crowds. The four things that Obama has on his own in great abundance &#8212; without Winfrey&#8217;s help &#8212; are campaign cash, celebrity, excitement and big crowds.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Halperin spends the rest of the piece noting how the conventional wisdom perceives Obama&#8217;s experience, and what the senator can do to help influence those perceptions and bolster his standing in the polls.<\/p>\n<p>So, on Sunday, Halperin <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/11\/25\/opinion\/25halperin.html?ex=1353646800&#038;en=5270ecdc6465e0dd&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">told the nation<\/a>, &#8220;In the face of polls and horse-race maneuvering, we can try to keep from getting sucked in by it all.&#8221; Four days later, he wrote a piece for publication about polls and horse-race maneuvering. I guess it didn&#8217;t take him long to get &#8220;sucked in.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The other piece Halperin published this week came on Tuesday, when the political analyst told viewers what to watch for in this week&#8217;s CNN\/YouTube debate. The entire <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/politics\/article\/0,8599,1688610,00.html\">700-word piece<\/a> was meta-analysis about Republicans&#8217; strategy and positioning.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>So watch to see what CNN chooses, and how the candidates handle a format that is certainly not their first choice. But most of all, watch for the engagement between a group of candidates who are a lot more focused on each other and the voting in Iowa and New Hampshire, just over a month away, than they are on talking snowmen and debate formats.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There wasn&#8217;t a single word of substance in the entire piece. No depth, just horse-race.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d hoped that Halperin would at least wait <i>a week<\/i> before giving up on his entire thesis and going back to the same, tired analysis that he denounced in his NYT op-ed, but apparently, the temptation to get &#8220;sucked in&#8221; was just too great.<\/p>\n<p>Lucky for Halperin, there&#8217;s no such thing as media accountability, so his sudden, jarring reversal will have absolutely no consequences at all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Less than a week ago, Time magazine&#8217;s Mark Halperin raised a quite a few eyebrows in the world of political journalism with a startling NYT op-ed. Halperin, best known for his work at ABC News (&#8220;The Note&#8221; was his creation) before becoming a senior political analyst for Time, argued that there are fundamental problems with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13763"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13763\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}