{"id":1396,"date":"2004-03-12T13:48:47","date_gmt":"2004-03-12T18:48:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/1396.html"},"modified":"2004-03-12T13:48:47","modified_gmt":"2004-03-12T18:48:47","slug":"tim-noah-talks-to-roy-moore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/tim-noah-talks-to-roy-moore\/","title":{"rendered":"Tim Noah talks to Roy Moore"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Slate&#8217;s Tim Noah, who seems about as fascinated with Roy Moore&#8217;s potential presidential campaign as I am, actually <a href=\"http:\/\/slate.msn.com\/id\/2096996\/\">talked to the theocrat<\/a> yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>At the outset, Noah identifies himself as someone who, like me, doesn&#8217;t actually want to see Moore win, just run to offer a counter balance to a certain former consumer advocate who shall remain nameless.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Installing Moore&#8217;s brand of religious fanaticism in the Oval Office would be ruinous to the country and dangerous to the world. But this is no time to dwell on such trivialities. What&#8217;s important is that Moore is thinking of running for president on a third-party ticket. He is a charismatic figure who has the potential to siphon a great many Christian right votes away from the pitiful Sodomites now occupying the White House. George W. Bush talks a good game, but can he even <i>name<\/i> all Ten Commandments? (Too bad the president is a teetotaler. This would be a great bar bet.)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There have been conflicting reports about Moore&#8217;s interest in a presidential campaign. His answers have varied from near-categorical rejection (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.weeklystandard.com\/Content\/Protected\/Articles\/000\/000\/003\/772xdbks.asp\">to the Weekly Standard<\/a>) to coy curiosity (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/03\/07\/weekinreview\/07kirk.html\">to the New York Times<\/a>). All the while, Moore has been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/001303.html\">flirting with the far-right Constitution Party<\/a>, which, as luck would have it, is on the ballot in 41 states.<\/p>\n<p>So Noah went directly to the source and asked Moore about his intentions. His answers suggest, at least to me, that this is a man who definitely <i>wants<\/i> to run.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Noah: Judge Moore, you&#8217;ve been traveling the country giving a lot of speeches under the auspices of the Constitution Party, and you&#8217;ve created a lot of speculation that you are planning to run for president on a third party ticket. Are you going to run for president?<\/p>\n<p>Moore: Well, first, I have not been speaking under the auspices of the Constitution Party. I have spoken to several Constitution Party events, but I&#8217;ve also spoken to colleges and churches and other groups across the country because I have been speaking about the First Amendment acknowledgment of God in our country. And I have no plans at this time to run. <i>That could change<\/i> [italics Noah&#8217;s]. But I have made no plans to run for any office right now.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That&#8217;s a whole lot of qualifiers. His feelings &#8220;could change&#8221;; he doesn&#8217;t have plans &#8220;at this time&#8221;; he&#8217;s not prepared to run &#8220;right now.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Noah noted that if Moore wants to run on the Constitution Party ticket, he&#8217;ll need to act relatively quickly. The deadline for running with the party is June 23, when it hosts its national convention. Again, Moore kept his options open.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Well, again, I have no decision to make if I&#8217;m not planning to run. I just, you know, haven&#8217;t got plans to run <i>right now<\/i> [italics Noah&#8217;s]. And if I do make a decision [to run] I guess it would be before November &#8212; er, June 23.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Since this talk first surfaced, Moore insisted that his appeal in Alabama, in which he&#8217;s trying to win back the job from which he was dismissed, is his primary concern. Of course, if that can be wrapped up in time for a presidential campaign, then his schedule will be free. Noah asked how much longer the appeals process is likely to take.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I think that within, I would say, two to three weeks if not this Friday &#8212; I mean, we expected the ruling already, but there is some delay for some reason that I don&#8217;t know &#8212; but we expect that decision within two to three weeks. And then of course we also would have an appeal to the United States Supreme Court <i>should we desire to take it<\/i> [italics Noah&#8217;s].<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Another interesting qualifier. Moore could lose his appeal (and he <i>will<\/i> lose his appeal) sometime this month. If he took his case to the Supreme Court, the issue wouldn&#8217;t be resolved until it was too late for a presidential campaign. But Moore told Slate that he may not bother to do that, thus making his schedule more flexible for a certain campaign.<\/p>\n<p>And finally, Moore also explained that he&#8217;s not exactly enamored with the two-party structure, a belief that Noah explained is a &#8220;crucial prerequisite to launching a third-party candidacy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I would say that there&#8217;s not much difference these days between those who run under one party or another because they&#8217;re all after seeking power. Power&#8217;s not what the Constitution was about. The Constitution was about a limitation on power. It was about the fact that the judiciary should stick to interpreting the law, not making it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Let&#8217;s hope that Alabama appeals process wraps up quickly so Moore can hit the campaign trail before it&#8217;s too late.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Slate&#8217;s Tim Noah, who seems about as fascinated with Roy Moore&#8217;s potential presidential campaign as I am, actually talked to the theocrat yesterday. At the outset, Noah identifies himself as someone who, like me, doesn&#8217;t actually want to see Moore win, just run to offer a counter balance to a certain former consumer advocate who [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1396","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1396","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1396"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1396\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}