{"id":14256,"date":"2008-01-16T12:50:57","date_gmt":"2008-01-16T17:50:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14256.html"},"modified":"2008-01-16T12:50:57","modified_gmt":"2008-01-16T17:50:57","slug":"did-authenticity-lose-when-romney-won","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/did-authenticity-lose-when-romney-won\/","title":{"rendered":"Did &#8216;authenticity&#8217; lose when Romney won?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The AP&#8217;s Ron Fournier, one of the more influential voices in the political media establishment, has a <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/on_deadline_michigan\">surprisingly pointed piece<\/a> today, taking on Mitt Romney on the issue of &#8220;authenticity.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Mitt Romney&#8217;s victory in Michigan was a defeat for authenticity in politics.<\/p>\n<p>The former Massachusetts governor pandered to voters, distorted his opponents&#8217; record and continued to show why he&#8217;s the most malleable &#8212; and least credible &#8212; major presidential candidate. And it worked. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>This still looks to be an authenticity election. First, voters are tired of being spun by politicians who aren&#8217;t getting their jobs done&#8230;. Second, the Internet and other technological advances make it nearly impossible to hide a miscue or a shift of position. Can a candidate like Romney win in the YouTube era? Sure. He just did.<\/p>\n<p>But to go all the way, Romney must overcome the original sin of his campaign &#8212; his choice to do whatever it takes to be president. The smart money says he can&#8217;t.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now, the specific issue that got Fourier&#8217;s goat was the rhetoric about the economy in the run up to yesterday&#8217;s Republican primary in Michigan. John McCain told voters that any candidate who tells voters that traditional auto manufacturing jobs &#8220;are coming back is either naive or is not talking straight with the people of Michigan and America.&#8221; Romney said McCain was taking a defeatist attitude, and called the senator&#8217;s approach &#8220;baloney.&#8221; As far as Fournier is concerned, Romney was &#8220;pandering &#8230; taking the tactic to new heights.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Well, sure. What I&#8217;m less clear on is what Fournier means by &#8220;authenticity election.&#8221;<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nFournier doesn&#8217;t exactly define the word as he sees it, but in this context, &#8220;authenticity&#8221; appears to hinge on consistency. If a candidate sticks to his or her beliefs, he or she is authentic. If candidates shift to become what they think voters want, they&#8217;re not. To succeed, Fourier argues, a candidate has to be authentic enough to connect with voters, who can spot a phony.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Rather than running on his record as a can-do pragmatist in an era of government incompetence, Romney listened to advisers who said there was a tactical advantage in turning himself into the field&#8217;s social conservative.<\/p>\n<p>Their reasoning: Evangelicals and Republicans who put social issues atop their list had found McCain and Rudy Giuliani, the two early front-runners, unpalatable, so there was room to run on the right.<\/p>\n<p>Now he&#8217;s won Wyoming and Michigan and leads in the delegate count. Does pandering pay?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>A few points. First, Romney is manufactured one of the more dramatic ideological metamorphoses in recent memory. But if he planned to compete as a Republican presidential candidate, he didn&#8217;t have a choice &#8212; a Mormon Massachusetts moderate who supported abortion rights, gay rights, gun control, and stem-cell research simply wasn&#8217;t credible. (Don&#8217;t believe me? Take a look at how Giuliani is doing so far.) <i>Of course<\/i> Romney&#8217;s pandering. The point is, he doesn&#8217;t have a choice if he wants to be the GOP nominee.<\/p>\n<p>Second, I can appreciate Fournier&#8217;s disappointment about a phony, insincere charlatan persevering, but I wonder: does Fournier realize that this label applies to most of the leading Republican candidates?<\/p>\n<p>Rudy Giuliani was to the left of his party (and some Democrats) on practically every culture-war issue in the country. Now he&#8217;s transformed himself into a conservative. Authentic? Strike one.<\/p>\n<p>John McCain was a Republican maverick, who considered joining the Democratic Senate caucus in 2001. Now, he&#8217;s flip-flopped on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/13746.html\">practically everything<\/a> he claimed to believe in. Authentic? Strike two.<\/p>\n<p>As soon as he became a serious challenger for the GOP nomination, Mike Huckabee started flip-flopping <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/13886.html\">all over the place<\/a>, on everything from trade to immigration to healthcare. Authentic? Strike three.<\/p>\n<p>The point is, Fournier is perfectly right to call Romney out for his shamelessness. But about the only guy in the Republican field who&#8217;s been consistently right-wing throughout his career is Fred Thompson, who apparently doesn&#8217;t feel like running for president right now.<\/p>\n<p>Fournier asks, &#8220;Does pandering pay?&#8221; Unless Thompson or Ron Paul gets the GOP nod, I&#8217;m pretty comfortable answering, &#8220;Obviously, yes.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The AP&#8217;s Ron Fournier, one of the more influential voices in the political media establishment, has a surprisingly pointed piece today, taking on Mitt Romney on the issue of &#8220;authenticity.&#8221; Mitt Romney&#8217;s victory in Michigan was a defeat for authenticity in politics. The former Massachusetts governor pandered to voters, distorted his opponents&#8217; record and continued [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14256","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14256","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14256"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14256\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14256"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14256"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14256"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}