{"id":14259,"date":"2008-01-16T15:30:16","date_gmt":"2008-01-16T20:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14259.html"},"modified":"2008-01-16T15:30:16","modified_gmt":"2008-01-16T20:30:16","slug":"huckabee-statement-on-submissive-wives-not-open-to-interpretation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/huckabee-statement-on-submissive-wives-not-open-to-interpretation\/","title":{"rendered":"Huckabee statement on submissive wives &#8216;not open to interpretation&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Among the many, many <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/13963.html\">controversial things<\/a> Mike Huckabee has said in recent years, he&#8217;s still facing questions about his belief that wives should &#8220;graciously submit&#8221; to a husband&#8217;s &#8220;leadership.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re just joining us, in 1998, Huckabee was one of 131 signatories to a full page USA Today Ad which declared, &#8220;I affirm the statement on the family issued by the 1998 Southern Baptist Convention.&#8221; The SBC&#8217;s family statement insisted, &#8220;A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ.&#8221; The ad Huckabee signed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/storyonly\/2007\/12\/10\/12517\/525\/811\/420237\">specifically said<\/a> of the SBC family statement, &#8220;You are right because you called wives to graciously submit to their husband&#8217;s sacrificial leadership.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The subject came up at a recent Fox News debate, and Huckabee seemed to already have a response in mind: &#8220;The point is that as wives submit themselves to the husbands, the husbands also submit themselves, and it&#8217;s not a matter of one being somehow superior over the other.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>See? Huckabee and the Southern Baptists just want spouses to be submissive to one another. What&#8217;s so controversial about that? Oddly enough, <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Blotter\/story?id=4143050&#038;page=1 \">plenty<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>According to [Richard Land, president of the SBC&#8217;s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission], the statement says that while the husband and wife are equal before God, &#8220;the wife does not get veto power over the husband&#8217;s decision.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Somebody has to be in charge,&#8221; Land explained. &#8220;The Bible says the husband is in charge.&#8221; While the husband should &#8220;solicit his wife&#8217;s views,&#8221; ultimately &#8220;he is going to make the decision.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>The reason, Land said, is that Southern Baptists believe that &#8220;God holds the husband accountable for the household.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The Rev. Alan Brehm, who was a Southern Baptist theologian teaching at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in 1998, said Huckabee isn&#8217;t telling the truth and that the statement endorsed by Huckabee &#8220;was not open to interpretation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a two-fer &#8212; Huckabee was wrong in signing the statement in 1998, and he was wrong to lie about in 2008.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nAnd as long as we&#8217;re talking about Huckabee, remember yesterday&#8217;s controversy about his desire to change the Constitution to fit &#8220;God&#8217;s standards&#8221;? Alan Colmes asked Huckabee about the comments last night.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>COLMES: All right, Governor, you made a statement at a rally in Michigan within the last 24 hours. You said, I have opponents in this race who do not want to change the Constitution. You said, I believe it&#8217;s a lot easier to change the Constitution than it&#8217;d be to change the word of the living God, and that&#8217;s what we need to do.&#8221; That makes people a little worried. It sounds like you&#8217;re looking to have a theocratic state when you make statements like that&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>HUCKABEE: Not at all&#8230;. On two things. The context is two things, human life amendment, which I support and which has been in the Republican platform since 1980. And by the way, Fred Thompson doesn&#8217;t support it, nor does John McCain. <\/p>\n<p>And yet it&#8217;s part of our platform. And it&#8217;s a very important part of our platform to say that human life is something we&#8217;re going to stand for. And the second thing is traditional marriage.<\/p>\n<p>So those are the two areas which I&#8217;m talking about. I&#8217;m not suggesting that we rewrite the Constitution to reflect tithing or Sunday school attendance. I want to make that very clear.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I see. So, Huckabee doesn&#8217;t want to make the Constitution fit &#8220;God&#8217;s standards&#8221; in general, he just wants to make the Constitution fit &#8220;God&#8217;s standards&#8221; when it comes to gays and reproductive rights. I feel better already.<\/p>\n<p>OK, one more Huckabee item. <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2008\/01\/16\/pinkerton-mosques\/\">ThinkProgress noted<\/a> that the former governor&#8217;s newest senior advisor, James Pinkerton, has quite a colorful rhetorical history, including calling for putting &#8220;a cop in front of every mosque&#8221; and blaming Republican corruption in Texas on the state&#8217;s &#8220;proximity to Mexico.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I assume we can now look forward to a Richard Cohen column, blasting Mike Huckabee for not having condemned his own aide&#8217;s dumb comments?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Among the many, many controversial things Mike Huckabee has said in recent years, he&#8217;s still facing questions about his belief that wives should &#8220;graciously submit&#8221; to a husband&#8217;s &#8220;leadership.&#8221; If you&#8217;re just joining us, in 1998, Huckabee was one of 131 signatories to a full page USA Today Ad which declared, &#8220;I affirm the statement [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14259"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14259\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}