{"id":14346,"date":"2008-01-24T15:05:33","date_gmt":"2008-01-24T20:05:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14346.html"},"modified":"2008-01-24T15:05:33","modified_gmt":"2008-01-24T20:05:33","slug":"clinton-pushes-obama-into-a-catch-22","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/clinton-pushes-obama-into-a-catch-22\/","title":{"rendered":"Clinton pushes Obama into a catch-22"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After a couple of weeks of dubious and misleading <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14333.html\">criticisms<\/a> directed his way, Barack Obama&#8217;s campaign has decided to respond in kind, unveiling an <a href=\"http:\/\/tpmelectioncentral.com\/2008\/01\/obama_radio_ad_hillary_will_say_anything_to_get_elected.php\">aggressive new ad<\/a>. It argues that Hillary Clinton is &#8220;making false attacks on Barack Obama,&#8221; and she &#8220;will say anything to get elected.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Washington Post says Clinton isn&#8217;t telling the truth. Obama &#8216;did not say that he liked the ideas of Republicans.&#8217; In fact, Obama&#8217;s led the fight to raise the minimum wage, close corporate tax loopholes and cut taxes for the middle class.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But it was Hillary Clinton, in an interview with Tom Brokaw, who quote &#8216;paid tribute&#8217; to Ronald Reagan&#8217;s economic and foreign policy. She championed NAFTA &#8212; even though it has cost South Carolina thousands of jobs. And worst of all, it was Hillary Clinton who voted for George Bush&#8217;s war in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Hillary Clinton. She&#8217;ll say anything, and change nothing. It&#8217;s time to turn the page.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As far as I can tell, there are no obvious factual errors in Obama&#8217;s ad, and in general, I think the &#8220;say anything&#8221; line is a pretty good one. The Clinton campaign has been using a &#8220;kitchen sink&#8221; strategy since the Iowa caucuses, and a blanket &#8220;she&#8217;ll say anything to win&#8221; meme takes a dismissive attitude towards <i>all<\/i> the attacks.<\/p>\n<p>The Clinton campaign has issued talking points to surrogates about the commercial, though, and it highlights Obama&#8217;s catch-22.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe headline reads, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/tpmelectioncentral.com\/2008\/01\/here_are_hillarys_talking_points_for_surrogates_on_obama_attack_ad.php\">Sen. Obama&#8217;s Personal Attack Ad<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>* After months of telling Americans he would run a positive campaign, Senator Obama has launched the most negative, personal attack of this cycle.<\/p>\n<p>* In a new ad airing in South Carolina, Senator Obama outrageously asserts that Senator Clinton will &#8220;say anything to get elected.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* This from a candidate and a campaign who have promised voters a politics of hope and unity, and repeatedly denounced the &#8220;slash and burn politics of the past.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;In August, Senator Obama told the Associated Press that &#8220;I&#8217;ve been respectful of all the candidates. I would challenge anyone to find a statement I&#8217;ve made that has been personal.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;Earlier this year, Senator Obama&#8217;s Chief Strategist David Axelrod told Real Clear Politics, &#8220;Do we have a strategy to tear people down? We don&#8217;t.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;And just two weeks ago, Senator Obama told Newsweek that he would not &#8220;knee cap&#8221; his opponents.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The Clinton campaign isn&#8217;t disputing any of Obama&#8217;s charges; they&#8217;re arguing that Obama isn&#8217;t supposed to be making any charges at all. The Clinton campaign also isn&#8217;t taking a holier-than-thou attitude &#8212; they&#8217;ve clearly been throwing plenty of mud &#8212; but is instead arguing that Obama is using the same take-no-prisoners attitude Clinton embraced weeks ago. (That&#8217;s not hypocrisy, Team Clinton would likely say, because she never promised anyone &#8220;hope and unity.&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>And therein lies the problem. Obama said he wanted to stay positive; Clinton said she wanted to win. When Clinton went on the attack, including taking a few cheap shots, it created a conundrum &#8212; if Obama returned fire, he&#8217;d be guilty of the same kind of politics he finds distasteful in Clinton. If he didn&#8217;t return fire, Clinton gets away with dishonest attacks and Obama gets hit with stories like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/0108\/8079_Page2.html\">this one<\/a>, which question whether he&#8217;s ready for the rough-and-tumble, no-holds-barred national stage.<\/p>\n<p>We saw at the debate earlier this week that Obama is <i>capable<\/i> of mixing it up and trading shots with Clinton, but it automatically leaves him in a jam &#8212; he&#8217;s playing by Clinton&#8217;s rules.<\/p>\n<p>As I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14312.html\">noted<\/a> the other day, Clinton doesn&#8217;t mind getting into a good ol&#8217; fashioned brawl; she&#8217;s quick, smart, and quite adept in these scuffles. The problem for Obama is getting dragged into the mud when he wants to aim higher.<\/p>\n<p>If he returns fire, it&#8217;s politics as usual, with politicians bickering and getting personal. If he doesn&#8217;t return fire, and aims for a &#8220;new kind of politics,&#8221; the attacks from Clinton start to stick, and questions about general election &#8220;toughness&#8221; emerge.<\/p>\n<p>Clinton knows all of this, of course, and will use it as much as possible.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After a couple of weeks of dubious and misleading criticisms directed his way, Barack Obama&#8217;s campaign has decided to respond in kind, unveiling an aggressive new ad. It argues that Hillary Clinton is &#8220;making false attacks on Barack Obama,&#8221; and she &#8220;will say anything to get elected.&#8221; &#8220;The Washington Post says Clinton isn&#8217;t telling the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14346","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14346"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14346\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}