{"id":14382,"date":"2008-01-28T09:15:03","date_gmt":"2008-01-28T14:15:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14382.html"},"modified":"2008-01-28T09:15:03","modified_gmt":"2008-01-28T14:15:03","slug":"keeping-the-big-dog-on-the-porch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/keeping-the-big-dog-on-the-porch\/","title":{"rendered":"Keeping the Big Dog on the porch?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Friday, the day before Barack Obama&#8217;s easy victory in South Carolina&#8217;s presidential primary, the NYT noted that the Clinton campaign had every intention to keep Bill Clinton in &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/01\/25\/us\/politics\/25clinton.html?ref=us\">attack mode<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Advisers to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton say they have concluded that Bill Clinton&#8217;s aggressive politicking against Senator Barack Obama is resonating with voters, and they intend to keep him on the campaign trail in a major role after the South Carolina primary.<\/p>\n<p>The benefits of having Mr. Clinton challenge Mr. Obama so forcefully, over Iraq and Mr. Obama&#8217;s record and statements, they say, are worth the trade-offs. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Clinton is deliberately trying to play bad cop against Mr. Obama, campaign officials say, and is keenly aware that a flash of anger or annoyance will draw even more media and public attention to his arguments&#8230;. They also see benefits in Mr. Clinton&#8217;s drawing the ire of the Obama camp, predicting that there will be a voter backlash against Mr. Obama if the former president looks like a victim in the cut-and-thrust of the race.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That was the day before the primary. The day after, the campaign has come to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/01\/28\/us\/politics\/28dems.html\">a very different conclusion<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton&#8217;s campaign team, seeking to readjust after her lopsided defeat in South Carolina and amid a sense among many Democrats that Mr. Clinton had injected himself clumsily into the race, will try to shift the former president back into the sunnier, supportive-spouse role that he played before Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s loss in the Iowa caucuses, Clinton advisers said. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>After a week of all-out campaigning by Mr. Clinton in South Carolina, where Mrs. Clinton came in a distant second to Mr. Obama, there is also fresh concern among some advisers that Mr. Clinton&#8217;s visibility has dented her argument that she has the best experience for the job. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Representative Charles B. Rangel of New York, a leading supporter of Mrs. Clinton, said on Sunday that Mr. Clinton was going to pull back. &#8220;He&#8217;s got to,&#8221; Mr. Rangel said. &#8220;The focus has got to get back on Hillary. For all that he cares about his wife, this has to be her election to win, and it&#8217;s become too much about his role.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Scaling back, however, may not be easy.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nFirst, it seems the Clinton campaign has been struggling with this question for several weeks now. Before the Iowa caucuses, BC played a very high-profile role on the campaign trail. After HRC&#8217;s third-place finish, the former president&#8217;s role was scaled down. In Nevada, BC&#8217;s role was escalated again, and expanded even more in South Carolina. Now, the campaign is talking about reversing course, once again. Usually, these guys are a little more disciplined and a little less haphazard in campaign strategy.<\/p>\n<p>Second, as much as I respect and admire Bill Clinton&#8217;s many, many strengths, he&#8217;s tough to muzzle. If the plan is to keep him on the campaign trail, but as a positive advocate instead of an attack dog, there&#8217;s always the risk that BC will get asked a question about Obama, and he just won&#8217;t be able to help himself. It leads to problems like the one we saw on Saturday with BC&#8217;s Jesse Jackson comparison, which was universally panned as the wrong thing to say.<\/p>\n<p>That said, if the campaign is serious about shifting BC&#8217;s role, I think it&#8217;d be a step in the right direction. From my perspective, HRC is a very capable candidate, with a compelling campaign pitch. BC, for all he brings to the campaign, has begun to distract from his wife&#8217;s message.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230;Democrats said it was not clear whether the effects of Mr. Clinton&#8217;s high profile could be brushed away by having him modulate his campaign style. They said Mr. Clinton had upset some of the central themes of Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s campaign, including her appeal to women and her assertions that her time in the White House during the 1990s amounted to vital experience rather than a link to a presidency defined as much by scandal and partisan divisions as by its successes on fronts like the economy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Stay tuned.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Friday, the day before Barack Obama&#8217;s easy victory in South Carolina&#8217;s presidential primary, the NYT noted that the Clinton campaign had every intention to keep Bill Clinton in &#8220;attack mode.&#8221; Advisers to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton say they have concluded that Bill Clinton&#8217;s aggressive politicking against Senator Barack Obama is resonating with voters, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14382"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14382\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}