{"id":14546,"date":"2008-02-11T13:40:52","date_gmt":"2008-02-11T18:40:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14546.html"},"modified":"2008-02-11T13:40:52","modified_gmt":"2008-02-11T18:40:52","slug":"obama-and-policy-details-the-little-meme-that-couldnt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/obama-and-policy-details-the-little-meme-that-couldnt\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama and policy details &#8212; the little meme that couldn&#8217;t"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Matt Yglesias <a href=\"http:\/\/matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com\/archives\/2008\/02\/obama_and_the_details.php\">noted<\/a> this morning that Barack Obama has been criticized, even by those sympathetic to him, for being somehow &#8220;insufficiently well-versed in policy matters.&#8221; Matt chalks this up to a lazy narrative: &#8220;Clinton <i>is<\/i> well-versed in policy but <i>isn&#8217;t<\/i> a charismatic figure, and Obama <i>is<\/i> charismatic so it &#8216;must&#8217; be that he&#8217;s not well-versed in policy. He&#8217;s cool and she&#8217;s the nerd.&#8221; The narrative, of course, is bogus.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>For one thing, these takes tend to have a certain vague quality to them and often are offered by people who don&#8217;t, themselves, have a particular aptitude for policy. I&#8217;ve never heard an anecdote that involved someone talking to Obama about some policy question and walking away feeling he had a notably poor grasp of the issue. <\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, this story is one of several narratives that seems to me to overlook his time in the Illinois State Senate. Obama didn&#8217;t have some vast army of staffers to rely on in that role, and he wasn&#8217;t just serving time there, either. He successfully authored and passed legislation and impressed a lot of Illinois progressives. Nor is the University of Chicago Law School in the habit of handing out teaching positions to dullards. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Last there&#8217;s the question of staff and advisors. The various smart people working with him on a whole variety of issues &#8212; starting with Samantha Power and Karen Kornbluh when he first got to the Senate and expanding ever since &#8212; don&#8217;t have any really compelling reasons to have been working with him unless they thought he was a smart, impressive person who was up to the task of doing a good job on the issues they care the most about.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>All of this struck me as pretty compelling, until I saw <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/archives\/individual\/2008_02\/013100.php\">Kevin Drum raise<\/a> an interesting counter-point &#8212; that no one is actually making the argument that Matt is debunking. &#8220;There are no links in the post, and virtually everything I&#8217;ve ever read about Obama acknowledges that he&#8217;s scary smart and extremely well briefed,&#8221; Kevin said, adding, &#8220;Who are these people who think Obama is a policy naif?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>At first blush, I assumed Kevin was mistaken. After all, it <i>seems<\/i> like I hear the &#8220;Obama lacks policy chops&#8221; argument all the time. So, I checked The Google.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIt turns out, Kevin seemed to be onto something. I searched for quite a few permutations &#8212; Obama with the words &#8220;lack specifics,&#8221; &#8220;weak details,&#8221; &#8220;thin details,&#8221; &#8220;all talk,&#8221; &#8220;lack substance,&#8221; &#8220;lack details,&#8221; etc. Oddly enough, I didn&#8217;t find nearly as much as I expected.<\/p>\n<p>The AP <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200703270004\">ran an item<\/a> criticizing Obama for providing &#8220;few details about how he would lead the country,&#8221; but that was last March, which in the context of the presidential campaign, might as well have been a century ago. There was a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eldoradotimes.com\/archive\/x1059371775\">recent editorial<\/a> in a Texas newspaper that recently said that Obama is &#8220;weak on details,&#8221; but the editorial itself wasn&#8217;t especially hard-hitting. The Hill recently <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/a.b.-stoddard\/within-the-machine-beats-a-human-heart-2008-01-10.html\">ran a column<\/a> knocking Obama&#8217;s &#8220;lack of specifics,&#8221; but it didn&#8217;t exactly get a lot of play.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s possible that there used to be more of these criticisms &#8212; Google seems to favor newer content &#8212; and that the negative critiques faded when they no longer made any sense, but after poking around for a while, I was pleasantly surprised that this knock on Obama, which never struck me as fair, wasn&#8217;t nearly as common as I expected.<\/p>\n<p>That said, while Googling around, I did notice that the Obama &#8220;lacks specifics&#8221; charge was <i>very<\/i> common in blog comment sections (including mine). Perhaps that&#8217;s what led Matt (and me) to think the charge is common, while Kevin is right about the broader discussion.<\/p>\n<p>Just a thought.<\/p>\n<p><i>Update<\/i>: As it turns out, just last night, on &#8220;60 Minutes,&#8221; Steve Kroft <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/stories\/2008\/02\/07\/60minutes\/main3804268_page2.shtml\">reported<\/a> that Obama puts policy details &#8220;on his website, but not in his stump speech.&#8221; That&#8217;s true, of course, but who wants any presidential candidate in either party to combine speeches and white papers?<\/p>\n<p><i>Second Update<\/i>: Perhaps I spoke too soon? Time&#8217;s Mark Halperin <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.tnr.com\/tnr\/blogs\/the_plank\/archive\/2008\/02\/11\/you-want-names-i-got-names.aspx\">writes today<\/a> that one of Obama&#8217;s great advantages is &#8220;an electorate that seems oddly indifferent to conventional norms of preparedness for the job of commander-in-chief \u2014 and which appears even more indifferent to the existence (or absence) of detailed policy prescriptions despite the grave problems confronting the nation.&#8221; That&#8217;s pretty awful analysis given reality.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Matt Yglesias noted this morning that Barack Obama has been criticized, even by those sympathetic to him, for being somehow &#8220;insufficiently well-versed in policy matters.&#8221; Matt chalks this up to a lazy narrative: &#8220;Clinton is well-versed in policy but isn&#8217;t a charismatic figure, and Obama is charismatic so it &#8216;must&#8217; be that he&#8217;s not well-versed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14546"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14546\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}