{"id":1456,"date":"2004-03-24T10:35:55","date_gmt":"2004-03-24T15:35:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/1456.html"},"modified":"2004-03-24T10:35:55","modified_gmt":"2004-03-24T15:35:55","slug":"considering-our-current-enemies-maybe-we-should-change-the-pledge-back","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/considering-our-current-enemies-maybe-we-should-change-the-pledge-back\/","title":{"rendered":"Considering our current enemies, maybe we should change the Pledge back"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In light of the Supreme Court case about the Pledge of Allegiance, which <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2004\/LAW\/03\/24\/scotus.pledge.ap\/index.html\">will be heard today<\/a>, I have a question. Yes, it&#8217;s a smart-alecky question.<\/p>\n<p>As most of you know, our parents and grandparents didn&#8217;t recite the same Pledge as we do today. It used to be entirely secular, and somehow patriotism and religiosity managed to survive in this country.<\/p>\n<p>The Rev. Francis Bellamy <a href=\"http:\/\/www.au.org\/site\/News2?page=NewsArticle&#038;id=5561&#038;abbr=cs_\">wrote the original Pledge in 1892<\/a> as part of a flag salute ceremony. (Modern-day conservatives may find it inconvenient, but Bellamy was a Baptist minister and a socialist. He was vice president of the Society of Christian Socialists and frequently lectured on &#8220;Jesus the Socialist.&#8221; But I digress&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>At the time, the Pledge read:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;I pledge allegiance to my flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Ten years later, Congress and President Benjamin Harrison endorsed Bellamy&#8217;s Pledge for use in public schools. The phrase &#8220;my flag&#8221; was changed to &#8220;the flag of the United States of America&#8221; in 1923.<\/p>\n<p>In 1954, at the height of &#8220;red scare,&#8221; Congress added &#8220;under God&#8221; to stick it to the godless commies. Introducing the resolution in the Senate, Sen. Homer Ferguson (R-Minn.) said, &#8220;I believe this modification of the Pledge is important because it highlights one of the real fundamental differences between the free world and the communist world, namely belief in God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Which is a very roundabout way of leading me to my question.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIf we added &#8220;under God&#8221; at the height of the Cold War because our enemies were godless communists, should we take the phrase out now because our enemies are religious fanatics?<\/p>\n<p>When the Pledge was added, the nation&#8217;s primary scourge were people who were professed atheists. (There&#8217;s plenty of debate about just how &#8220;godless&#8221; the Russians really were at the time, but that&#8217;s another story for another day.) The Knights of Columbus, which led the campaign to change the Pledge in 1954, saw this is a symbolic gesture to remind communists that Americans, in general, are a religious bunch.<\/p>\n<p>That was then. The new enemies America faced aren&#8217;t atheists; just the opposite. They&#8217;re deeply religious people who believe their efforts are guided by God. Indeed, they attack and slaughter <i>because<\/i> of their faith.<\/p>\n<p>If the Pledge is a rhetorical tool to send symbolic messages to our international foes, as the government said it was in the &#8217;50s, then perhaps we should revisit the wording to send a new message.<\/p>\n<p>After all, if the 1954 precedent is right, we should be going out of our way to distance ourselves from the ways of the enemy and &#8220;highlight the fundamental differences&#8221; between us and them. With that in mind, if fundamentalist terrorists desperately want religion and government to be merged in a theocracy, the U.S., in turn, should be doing everything possible to embrace church-state separation and make patriotic oaths like the Pledge of Allegiance completely secular.<\/p>\n<p>Just a thought.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In light of the Supreme Court case about the Pledge of Allegiance, which will be heard today, I have a question. Yes, it&#8217;s a smart-alecky question. As most of you know, our parents and grandparents didn&#8217;t recite the same Pledge as we do today. It used to be entirely secular, and somehow patriotism and religiosity [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1456\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}