{"id":14683,"date":"2008-02-25T09:15:28","date_gmt":"2008-02-25T14:15:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14683.html"},"modified":"2008-02-25T09:15:28","modified_gmt":"2008-02-25T14:15:28","slug":"when-the-right-balks-at-pursuing-al-qaeda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/when-the-right-balks-at-pursuing-al-qaeda\/","title":{"rendered":"When the right balks at pursuing al Qaeda"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have to admit, I didn&#8217;t see this one coming. I&#8217;d long assumed that if there were one thing the left and right could agree on, especially when it comes to foreign policy and counter-terrorism, it&#8217;s the pursuit of al Qaeda terrorists.<\/p>\n<p>With this in mind, Barack Obama&#8217;s pronouncement in August hardly seemed controversial. He stated his belief that the U.S. would pursue high-value terrorist targets, even if they hid in Pakistan&#8217;s tribal areas. We would notify Pakistani officials of our efforts, Obama said, but we wouldn&#8217;t necessarily wait for anyone&#8217;s permission &#8212; which is fully in line with existing U.S. foreign policy.<\/p>\n<p>For reasons that seem to defy common sense, much of the right has been whining ever since, suggesting Obama wants to &#8220;invade&#8221; Pakistan, and cares more about attacking al Qaeda than respecting Pakistan&#8217;s sovereign borders (the latter point is largely true). The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14647.html\">successful attack<\/a> on Abu Laith al-Libi last month seemed to lend credence to Obama&#8217;s policy.<\/p>\n<p>And yet, the right still isn&#8217;t happy. <a href=\"http:\/\/corner.nationalreview.com\/post\/?q=ZDYyNzgxNTQ3MTdmNjMzYWIyYTYwMzQyYzg0NzBhYmM=\">Here&#8217;s<\/a> the National Review&#8217;s David Freddoso, joining John McCain in questioning an aggressive terrorist-pursuit policy.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>As much as I appreciate the idea of a dead terrorist, I don&#8217;t like what we did in Pakistan, and I really don&#8217;t like the fact that we&#8217;re bragging about it, or that a presidential candidate would openly discuss it as an option.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;.But so powerful is Obamania that liberals can now praise even George W. Bush for doing something they would oppose under any other circumstances \u2014 all because of Obama&#8217;s ill-considered comments last year. That I cannot respect.<\/p>\n<p>The logic for this Pakistan operation clearly flies in the face of every argument against invading Iraq &#8212; international law, sovereignty, respect for other countries, our standing in the world, etc&#8230;. That Obama&#8217;s supporters would hold it up as some kind of model is deeply puzzling to me.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Not nearly as puzzling as this entire line of thinking.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nWhy would liberals oppose targeted strikes against dangerous terrorists? What about Obama&#8217;s comments was &#8220;ill-considered&#8221;? How are these strikes in any way similar to invading and occupying Iraq?<\/p>\n<p>As Kevin Drum <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/archives\/individual\/2008_02\/013189.php\">put it<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The dynamics here are certainly turning deeply weird, aren&#8217;t they? Freddoso may have a point about liberal reaction (though a drone missile attack in tribal territories is hardly comparable to a massive invasion and multi-year occupation in the heart of the Arab world), but it looks like conservatives might have the mirror opposite problem. Is McCain going to paint himself into a corner and start claiming that he opposes covert attacks just because Obama has said he supports them? And will conservatives then be forced to follow along?<\/p>\n<p>This is going to be one peculiar campaign if everyone starts bending themselves into a pretzel over this, with liberals defending covert strikes and conservatives trying to paint that attitude as reckless and naive. I can&#8217;t wait.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s truly bizarre. One gets the distinct impression that the right opposes Obama&#8217;s counter-terrorism position, not because he&#8217;s wrong, but because he&#8217;s a Dem whose opinions must be reflexively rejected regardless of merit. If Obama wants to pursue top al Qaeda operatives into Pakistan, Republicans argue, then the right answer is to <i>not<\/i> pursue  top al Qaeda operatives into Pakistan.<\/p>\n<p>Put it this way: what do you suppose the rhetoric would be like if the situation were reversed. If McCain had articulated Obama&#8217;s strategy, and Obama had taken up McCain&#8217;s argument. What would we be hearing right now? You know exactly what we&#8217;d hear &#8212; that only Republicans are willing to get tough with al Qaeda, Obama isn&#8217;t willing to follow AQ wherever they hide, one side&#8217;s tough and one side&#8217;s weak, etc.<\/p>\n<p>And yet, the situation is reversed. How completely unexpected that the right would embrace a weak-on-terror platform in an election year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have to admit, I didn&#8217;t see this one coming. I&#8217;d long assumed that if there were one thing the left and right could agree on, especially when it comes to foreign policy and counter-terrorism, it&#8217;s the pursuit of al Qaeda terrorists. With this in mind, Barack Obama&#8217;s pronouncement in August hardly seemed controversial. He [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14683"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14683\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}