{"id":14710,"date":"2008-02-27T10:40:59","date_gmt":"2008-02-27T15:40:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14710.html"},"modified":"2008-02-27T10:40:59","modified_gmt":"2008-02-27T15:40:59","slug":"washington-times-improves-its-style-guide-much-to-the-rights-chagrin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/washington-times-improves-its-style-guide-much-to-the-rights-chagrin\/","title":{"rendered":"Washington Times improves its style guide, much to the right&#8217;s chagrin"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For all the criticism I&#8217;ve directed towards the far-right Washington Times and its new editor, John Solomon, it&#8217;s only fair to give credit where it&#8217;s due &#8212; the paper changed its style guide this week, immediately making the paper more readable.<\/p>\n<p>Chances are, the typical newspaper reader never pays any attention to an outlet&#8217;s style guide, in part because nearly all professional outlets use modern standards that few would even notice. But reading the Washington Times the past several years is far more jarring &#8212; while the typical paper might make a reference to same-sex marriage, for example, the conservative Times mandated that every such reference say, &#8220;Homosexual &#8216;marriage.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Solomon, his ideological leanings notwithstanding, apparently wants to help drag the Washington Times, kicking and screaming if necessary, towards something that at least <i>reads<\/i> like a legitimate newspaper. As such, he&#8217;s issued word that the paper&#8217;s style guide <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2008\/02\/26\/wash-times-cuts-right-wing-rhetoric-from-style-guide\/\">will drop<\/a> some of the &#8220;hard-line conservative rhetoric&#8221; that has dominated the Times&#8217; text. Solomon told writers and editors:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>1) Clinton will be the headline word for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.<\/p>\n<p>2) Gay is approved for copy and preferred over homosexual, except in clinical references or references to sexual activity.<\/p>\n<p>3) The quotation marks will come off gay marriage (preferred over homosexual marriage).<\/p>\n<p>4) Moderate is approved, but centrist is still allowed.<\/p>\n<p>5) We will use illegal immigrants, not illegal aliens.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, the journalism at the Washington Times will probably stay the largely the same, but it will start to at least read more like a newspaper and less like a right-wing blog. It wasn&#8217;t entirely expected, but Solomon clearly made the right call on this. Kudos.<\/p>\n<p>Oddly enough, the paper&#8217;s fans are less than pleased.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nInstead of praising the paper for striving for legitimacy, conservatives are annoyed that the paper will now use a more professional style guide. Alex Koppelman <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/politics\/war_room\/2008\/02\/26\/washington_times\/index.html\">explained<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In a post on her blog, titled &#8220;P.C. at the Washington Times,&#8221; Michelle Malkin wrote, &#8220;Soon, they&#8217;ll drop &#8216;illegal&#8217; from &#8216;illegal immigrants.&#8217; Then, it&#8217;ll be &#8216;undocumented immigrants.&#8217; Then, they&#8217;ll just go the Harry Reid route and call them &#8216;undocumented Americans.'&#8221; Malkin also favorably cited blogger Chris Kelly at Lonewacko, who wrote that the &#8220;illegal immigrants&#8221; change might &#8220;indicate that the Washington Times is starting down the slippery slope towards being like the Washington Post.&#8221; Similarly, blogger Extreme Mortman joked, &#8220;Bad news illegal aliens &#8212; you don&#8217;t exist anymore. So sayeth the Washington Times. Now that illegal aliens don&#8217;t exist anymore, maybe they can likewise make my parking tickets disappear.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>And on Newsbusters, the blog of the Media Research Center, a conservative press watchdog, Tim Graham wrote that the new styles &#8220;underlin[e] the &#8216;mainstream&#8217; mistake &#8212; that whatever the reigning liberal sensibilities are in our news template, often defined by minority journalist groups, are defined as &#8216;neutral.&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>Liberals joke that the Times would put &#8216;gay marriage&#8217; in quotes, but the media mainstream is so sensitive in the other direction that they don&#8217;t even want to use &#8216;partial-birth abortion&#8217; in quotes, so they tie themselves into vague and confusing pretzels about &#8216;certain late-term procedures which we don&#8217;t want to describe out of our fear of being rapped on the knuckles with a ruler by Kate Michelman and Gloria Feldt&#8230;&#8217; This memo in no way means that Solomon is turning the Times into a liberal newspaper. You&#8217;d need more than a lingo change to arrive there. But it does suggest that Solomon has his eyes on impressing the national media elite, and not just impressing the inside-the-Beltway readership of the Times.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>How very silly. It&#8217;s not enough for the far-right that the Washington Times remain an unabashedly conservative, intentionally biased newspaper, advancing a partisan agenda in print. These conservatives are mad that the paper is going to use professional word-choice standards, which makes the whole thing less &#8230; fun.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, the Washington Times will read less like a right-wing blog, and right-wing blogs have decided that&#8217;s a problem.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no pleasing some people.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For all the criticism I&#8217;ve directed towards the far-right Washington Times and its new editor, John Solomon, it&#8217;s only fair to give credit where it&#8217;s due &#8212; the paper changed its style guide this week, immediately making the paper more readable. Chances are, the typical newspaper reader never pays any attention to an outlet&#8217;s style [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14710","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14710","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14710"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14710\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}