{"id":14741,"date":"2008-02-29T14:20:32","date_gmt":"2008-02-29T19:20:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14741.html"},"modified":"2008-02-29T14:20:32","modified_gmt":"2008-02-29T19:20:32","slug":"a-novel-approach-to-the-expectations-game","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/a-novel-approach-to-the-expectations-game\/","title":{"rendered":"A novel approach to the expectations game"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Way back on Feb. 12, the day Barack Obama cruised to easy victories in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia, Hillary Clinton&#8217;s campaign was already busy building up firewalls. Indeed, that afternoon, Clinton&#8217;s travel schedule didn&#8217;t include stops in any of the states voting that day, or in any state voting in February, but rather, saw three stops in Texas.<\/p>\n<p>Clinton campaign advisors privately conceded that big wins in Ohio and Texas were absolutely necessary to keep the campaign going. Alan Patricof, one of Clinton\u2019s national finance chairmen, added, \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/02\/12\/us\/politics\/12clinton.html\">[W]e can\u2019t wait to get to March 4<\/a>.\u201d More recently, Bill Clinton was surprisingly candid, conceding that his wife needed to win both Texas and Ohio to have a shot.<\/p>\n<p>Apparently, however, that&#8217;s the old Clinton spin. The new Clinton spin is that all four of the March 4 contests &#8212; Ohio, Texas, Vermont, and Rhode Island &#8212; are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/politics\/war_room\/2008\/02\/29\/must_wins\/index.html\">must-wins for <i>Obama<\/i><\/a>. Here&#8217;s the latest memo from Clinton HQ:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>With an eleven state winning streak coming out of February, Senator Obama is riding a surge of momentum that has enabled him to pour unprecedented resources into Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island and Vermont. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Senator Obama has campaigned hard in these states. He has spent time meeting editorial boards, courting endorsers, holding rallies, and &#8212; of course &#8212; making speeches.  If he cannot win all of these states with all this effort, there&#8217;s a problem. <\/p>\n<p>Should Senator Obama fail to score decisive victories with all of the resources and effort he is bringing to bear, the message will be clear: <\/p>\n<p>Democrats, the majority of whom have favored Hillary in the primary contests held to date, have their doubts about Senator Obama and are having second thoughts about him as a prospective standard-bearer.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, if Obama doesn&#8217;t win Clinton&#8217;s firewall states, it means he&#8217;s in big trouble? Really?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIndeed, Mark Penn went on to insist that Obama had to win Clinton&#8217;s firewall states &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/firstread.msnbc.msn.com\/archive\/2008\/02\/29\/716900.aspx\">decisively<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Yglesias <a href=\"http:\/\/matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com\/archives\/2008\/02\/im_confused.php\">responded<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>So if the candidate who&#8217;s leading in delegates, national polls, fundraising, and states won can&#8217;t <i>sweep<\/i> the March 4 primaries, then Clinton is the real winner? Maybe they should just go back to arguing that Texas doesn&#8217;t count.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It is a rather odd spin. Clinton picked Ohio and Texas as firewall states, she began campaigning there while Obama concentrated on February contests, and she started with double-digit poll leads in both states less than two weeks ago. This, after Obama won 11 consecutive contests, seized a large lead among delegates, and the Clinton campaign started looking for some way to slow down the avalanche.<\/p>\n<p>Turning this dynamic around, and suggesting that Clinton no longer has to view March 4 contests as must-win states, is awfully tricky, and frankly, not especially persuasive.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m afraid expectations are already set. If Clinton comes up short on Tuesday, the campaign will probably be out of spin.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Way back on Feb. 12, the day Barack Obama cruised to easy victories in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia, Hillary Clinton&#8217;s campaign was already busy building up firewalls. Indeed, that afternoon, Clinton&#8217;s travel schedule didn&#8217;t include stops in any of the states voting that day, or in any state voting in February, but [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14741","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14741","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14741"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14741\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}