{"id":14850,"date":"2008-03-11T09:00:52","date_gmt":"2008-03-11T13:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14850.html"},"modified":"2008-03-11T09:00:52","modified_gmt":"2008-03-11T13:00:52","slug":"what-are-the-political-implications-of-the-spitzer-scandal-are-there-any","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/what-are-the-political-implications-of-the-spitzer-scandal-are-there-any\/","title":{"rendered":"What are the political implications of the Spitzer scandal? Are there any?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Within a few hours of the Spitzer scandal breaking, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14836.html\">comically desperate<\/a> National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) <a href=\"http:\/\/tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com\/2008\/03\/nrcc_to_dems_return_spitzers_s.php\">hoped to connect<\/a> the New York governor&#8217;s scandal to some of New York&#8217;s House Democrats.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The NRCC, which is broke and in danger of sustaining more House losses, is grabbing at the Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal like a lifeline, sending out e-mails about Dem incumbents with the following title: &#8220;Will John Hall Return Spitzer&#8217;s Sleazy Money?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So far we&#8217;ve received five e-mails over at TPM: Three messages targeting freshman incumbents Michael Arcuri, Kirsten Gillibrand and John Hall, plus two against challengers Dan Maffei and Eric Massa, all of whom the NRCC says are now &#8220;ensnared&#8221; in Spitzer&#8217;s scandal.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s certainly possible NRCC officials are confused over the meaning of the word &#8220;ensnared,&#8221; but it&#8217;s more likely the Republican campaign committee thinks the Spitzer mess is a life-preserver that the GOP can use to &#8230; well, it&#8217;s not quite clear what they can use it for.<\/p>\n<p>How silly are the NRCC&#8217;s efforts? Even The Corner <a href=\"http:\/\/corner.nationalreview.com\/post\/?q=OWU3ZWNkNjAwYjYyOWQxZjdlNmU3NmZhMjJlMWJmZTI=\">dismissed<\/a> the party&#8217;s emails out of hand: &#8220;[W]hatever voters think, Spitzer&#8217;s moral turpitude has no bearing on the contributions he makes to candidates in his party. Unless the money was stolen, its return is a public relations exercise with no basis in moral reality. And to tie its recipients to Spitzer&#8217;s behavior is a fallacious exercise in guilt by association.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Quite right. But it does raise the broader question of the political impact of the Spitzer controversy. What&#8217;s the fall out? Is there one?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nI suppose every political development has to be connected in some way back to the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, but I just don&#8217;t see why Hillary Clinton&#8217;s name is <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20080311\/ap_on_el_pr\/clinton_spitzer;_ylt=AkrLDgekbsnuUhbObQWZXoVp24cA\">coming up so much<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton carefully sidestepped questions Monday about the sex scandal engulfing Eliot Spitzer, her home state governor and political ally.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t have any comment on that. Obviously I am sending my best wishes and thoughts to the governor and to his family,&#8221; Clinton said, opening her first campaign swing through Pennsylvania, which holds its presidential primary April 22.<\/p>\n<p>Spitzer apologized Monday after he was accused of paying for sex with a high-priced call girl. Authorities say he was caught on a federal wiretap arranging a tryst with the woman at a Washington hotel room. It was a blow to Clinton, who recently had intensified her criticism of rival Barack Obama&#8217;s relationship with Antoin &#8220;Tony&#8221; Rezko, a political patron on trial in federal court in Obama&#8217;s hometown of Chicago for alleged fraud and corruption.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Whether one supports Clinton or not, it&#8217;s hard to see why Spitzer&#8217;s scandal hurts Clinton. Yes, he supports her campaign, but they haven&#8217;t campaigned together, and Spitzer has hardly been a high-profile advocate. Indeed, the two aren&#8217;t even personally close. Why would this undermine Clinton in any way? This mess really has nothing to do with her.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com\/archives\/2008\/03\/campaign_implications.php\">Yglesias wondered<\/a> whether the Spitzer controversy might &#8220;make people worry about the fact that putting Bill Clinton back in the White House seems to raise the possibility of once again having a Democratic administration derailed by a sex scandal.&#8221; Maybe, but it seems like a stretch to me.<\/p>\n<p>There are times in which a sex scandal affects the party of the accused. When the Mark Foley matter first arose, congressional Republicans were reeling. When it looked as if the party&#8217;s leadership may have put partisan considerations above the safety of kids, the Foley scandal made the GOP look worse, and may have contributed to Republicans losing their congressional majority.<\/p>\n<p>But the Spitzer scandal is in no way similar. Indeed, in most instances, personal humiliations like these have no bearing on the person&#8217;s party at all. It&#8217;s just not realistic to think a voter will conclude, &#8220;I was going to vote for a Democrat in November, but Eliot Spitzer hired a prostitute.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Sorry, Republicans, there&#8217;s just not much to be gained here.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Within a few hours of the Spitzer scandal breaking, the comically desperate National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) hoped to connect the New York governor&#8217;s scandal to some of New York&#8217;s House Democrats. The NRCC, which is broke and in danger of sustaining more House losses, is grabbing at the Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal like a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14850","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14850","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14850"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14850\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14850"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14850"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14850"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}