{"id":14883,"date":"2008-03-13T12:45:38","date_gmt":"2008-03-13T16:45:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14883.html"},"modified":"2008-03-13T12:45:38","modified_gmt":"2008-03-13T16:45:38","slug":"nrcc-exploits-spitzer-successfully","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/nrcc-exploits-spitzer-successfully\/","title":{"rendered":"NRCC exploits Spitzer &#8212; successfully?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The National Republican Congressional Committee, in light of its <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14836.html\">many problems<\/a>, has become something of a punch-line lately. As retiring Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va), a former NRCC chairman, <a href=\"http:\/\/talkingpointsmemo.com\/archives\/183241.php\">put it<\/a>, &#8220;The House Republican brand is so bad right now that if it were a dog food, they&#8217;d take it off the shelf.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But the Republicans&#8217; House campaign committee keeps plugging along. In some instances, logic be damned, it even gets what it wants.<\/p>\n<p>On Tuesday, within a few hours of the Eliot Spitzer scandal breaking, the NRCC <a href=\"http:\/\/tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com\/2008\/03\/nrcc_to_dems_return_spitzers_s.php\">hoped to connect<\/a> the governor&#8217;s controversy to some of New York&#8217;s House Democrats. The committee sent out emails about Dems with titles such as, &#8220;Will John Hall Return Spitzer&#8217;s Sleazy Money?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Even The Corner <a href=\"http:\/\/corner.nationalreview.com\/post\/?q=OWU3ZWNkNjAwYjYyOWQxZjdlNmU3NmZhMjJlMWJmZTI=\">dismissed<\/a> the NRCC&#8217;s efforts as being &#8220;a public relations exercise with no basis in moral reality.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What I didn&#8217;t expect at all was for New York Dems to actually <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/03\/12\/AR2008031203749.html\">give in<\/a> to this nonsense.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;New York Democrats should resign themselves to giving up the disgraced Governor&#8217;s sleazy cash before it&#8217;s too late and they find themselves being escorted out of office by the voters in November,&#8221; said NRCC spokesman Ken Spain.<\/p>\n<p>Even after Spitzer resigned, the NRCC sent out a news release bashing three-term Rep. Timothy H. Bishop (D-N.Y.) for taking a $2,000 campaign donation from Spitzer.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Will Tim Bishop Return Spitzer&#8217;s Sleazy Money?&#8221; the headline blared. Noting that Bishop ran on an ethics reform platform, the GOP release asked, &#8220;Will Democrat Tim Bishop live up to his promise of holding elected officials to a higher standard or will he run and hide from his campaign promises once again?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Bishop quickly gave the money to charity, and in a statement said he was livid at Republicans for making Spitzer&#8217;s donations a campaign issue.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Then why did Bishop do what the NRCC demanded?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\n&#8220;That the NRCC is attempting to link this shocking and disturbing situation to individuals who clearly had nothing to do with it points to their utter desperation,&#8221; Bishop said. &#8220;If such smear campaigns are all they have to offer, then they are destined to remain in the minority for a long time.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s all true, but the appropriate response, then, is to <i>ignore<\/i> the NRCC&#8217;s absurd demands, not actually give away the amount of Spitzer&#8217;s support.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s more, it&#8217;s not just Bishop. The NRCC went after Eric Massa, a Democratic House candidate, for accepting a contribution from Spitzer, and Massa also returned the cash. (Update: I spoke with the Massa campaign, which explained that he actually donated the money to a local charity, and didn&#8217;t &#8220;return&#8221; the money.)<\/p>\n<p>Isn&#8217;t this only going to encourage the NRCC to pull similarly nonsensical stunts in the future?<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s likely that the Dems just decided it wasn&#8217;t worth the trouble. Spitzer paid for sex, and they didn&#8217;t want to keep his campaign contributions and be associated with him. Fine.<\/p>\n<p>But with this in mind, CREW <a href=\"http:\/\/citizensforethics.org\/node\/31260\">raises a good point<\/a> today:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In light of the National Republican Congressional Committee\u2019s call for candidates and members of Congress to return soon-to-be former Gov. Eliot Spitzer\u2019s (D) donations, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) wonders why members and the National Republican Senatorial Committee have not returned Sen. David Vitter\u2019s (R-LA) contributions. As widely reported, Sen. Vitter has solicited prostitutes in the past. Rather than being condemned and ostracized, Sen. Vitter received a standing ovation at a Republican Caucus luncheon after his transgressions became public.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>At this point, I suspect the Vitter-Spitzer comparison is growing tiresome, but it&#8217;s actually helpful in this case. The NRCC insists that Democratic lawmakers shouldn&#8217;t keep contributions from someone caught hiring a prostitute. It stands to reason, then, that Republican lawmakers should also not keep contributions from someone caught hiring a prostitute.<\/p>\n<p>If so, CREW published a list of all kinds of GOP officials and campaign committees who&#8217;ve benefitted from Vitter&#8217;s generosity. Bishop and Massa returned Spitzer&#8217;s money &#8212; should we expect these Republicans to do the same with Vitter&#8217;s money?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The National Republican Congressional Committee, in light of its many problems, has become something of a punch-line lately. As retiring Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va), a former NRCC chairman, put it, &#8220;The House Republican brand is so bad right now that if it were a dog food, they&#8217;d take it off the shelf.&#8221; But [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14883"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14883\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}