{"id":14967,"date":"2008-03-21T12:40:16","date_gmt":"2008-03-21T16:40:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/14967.html"},"modified":"2008-03-21T12:40:16","modified_gmt":"2008-03-21T16:40:16","slug":"the-perceptions-that-feed-an-honesty-gap","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/the-perceptions-that-feed-an-honesty-gap\/","title":{"rendered":"The perceptions that feed an &#8216;honesty gap&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>According to the latest <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gallup.com\/poll\/105097\/Perceived-Honesty-Gap-Clinton-Versus-Obama-McCain.aspx\">Gallup poll<\/a>, Hillary Clinton has a veracity problem.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Hillary Clinton is rated as &#8220;honest and trustworthy&#8221; by 44% of Americans, far fewer than say this about John McCain (67%) and Barack Obama (63%).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>More specifically, when respondents were asked about the candidates&#8217; honesty and trustworthiness, McCain did very well (67%-27% in his favor), Obama did nearly as well (63%-29% in his favor), while Clinton fared poorly (44%-53% against her).<\/p>\n<p>Worse, Gallup offers some sense of trend-lines, which show the numbers going <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gallup.com\/poll\/105097\/Perceived-Honesty-Gap-Clinton-Versus-Obama-McCain.aspx#2\">in the wrong direction<\/a>. Way back in 1994, the then-First Lady was perceived as generally honest and trustworthy (56%-36% in her favor). In 2005, then-Sen. Clinton fared about as well (53%-43% in her favor). Now, a majority side against her on the issue, leading Gallup to point to a so-called &#8220;honesty gap.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>To be sure, all the usual caveats apply (it&#8217;s only one poll, the election is still far off, etc.), but I can&#8217;t quite figure out why Clinton fares so poorly on this question. I know all the textbook attacks on Hillary&#8217;s personal qualities and character traits, but since when do people consider her dishonest? What has she lied about?<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, very little of the campaign thus far has focused on Clinton&#8217;s sincerity (or the perception of the lack thereof). Off the top of my head, the usual, conventional knocks on her are that she&#8217;ll &#8220;do anything to win,&#8221; her foreign policy vision is too far to the right, she&#8217;s an &#8220;agent of the status quo,&#8221; she&#8217;s &#8220;divisive,&#8221; and after two terms of a Clinton presidency, Hillary is &#8220;part of the past.&#8221; They&#8217;ve practically become cliches.<\/p>\n<p>But does anyone go around questioning Hillary Clinton&#8217;s veracity?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nI really can&#8217;t think of any obvious whoppers that have captured any attention at all lately. She appears to have exaggerated her foreign policy background a bit, but not <i>that<\/i> much. So what&#8217;s up with these numbers?<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s probably a stretch, but the only thing I can think of is that the Clinton campaign&#8217;s aggressive criticisms of Obama, some of which have been a little sketchy, have driven up her negatives among some Dems, bringing her overall &#8220;honest and trustworthy&#8221; numbers down.<br \/>\nThe latest <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/htdocs\/pdf\/MAR08A_DEMS.pdf\">CBS News poll<\/a> (pdf), for example, asked about whether the Democratic candidates had attacked each other unfairly. The results showed that 23% of Dems nationally felt Clinton had attacked Obama unfairly, while only 1% of Dems said Obama had attacked Clinton unfairly.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe that&#8217;s contributing to the impression, maybe not. All I know is that Clinton has been <i>far<\/i> more honest and trustworthy than McCain&#8217;s been in this campaign, and yet, she&#8217;s trailing him on this issue by a whopping 23 points.<\/p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, the Obama campaign&#8217;s David Plouffe <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/blogs\/bensmith\/0308\/Whos_unelectable_now.html\">welcomed the numbers<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;It will be next to impossible to win a general election if more than half of the people think that you are not trustworthy,&#8221; he said, after citing Clinton&#8217;s poor, sub-50-percent Gallup rating on honesty and trustworthiness.<\/p>\n<p>Plouffe cited &#8220;a real character gap&#8221; and &#8220;real issues if she&#8217;s going to be our nominee.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Sen. Clinton will have a narrow playing field, in terms of the states she can put in play, and she does have this issue around trustworthiness that will give her no margin for error,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It&#8217;s hard to alleviate that if you continually engage in this misleading of voters.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That, of course, is about what we&#8217;d expect Obama&#8217;s campaign manager to say, but the point is nevertheless important. Clinton should probably do more to bring up these numbers &#8212; though I haven&#8217;t the foggiest idea how &#8212; if for no other reason because superdelegates may pause before backing a candidate that most Americans don&#8217;t trust.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to the latest Gallup poll, Hillary Clinton has a veracity problem. Hillary Clinton is rated as &#8220;honest and trustworthy&#8221; by 44% of Americans, far fewer than say this about John McCain (67%) and Barack Obama (63%). More specifically, when respondents were asked about the candidates&#8217; honesty and trustworthiness, McCain did very well (67%-27% in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14967","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14967"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14967\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}