{"id":150,"date":"2003-04-25T07:56:43","date_gmt":"2003-04-25T12:56:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/150.html"},"modified":"2003-04-25T07:56:43","modified_gmt":"2003-04-25T12:56:43","slug":"bush-cites-his-own-economic-team-as-an-unbiased-source","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/bush-cites-his-own-economic-team-as-an-unbiased-source\/","title":{"rendered":"Bush cites his own economic team as an unbiased source"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I know it can&#8217;t be easy for Bush to try and generate public demand for his tax cut plan. Even voters with a passive familiarity with current events know that the U.S. is running huge deficits, government programs are getting cut, and unless they&#8217;re pretty wealthy, they don&#8217;t have much more money in their pocket from the last time Bush begged for a tax cut.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, I suspect some voters wonder where all the great benefits Bush promised from the 2001 round of tax breaks for the wealthy. Where&#8217;s the strong economic growth Bush guaranteed? Where are all the new jobs that he said would be created? Where&#8217;s the prescription drug benefit and money for education he said we could afford? Why is the administration raiding the Social Security trust fund after promising that wouldn&#8217;t happen?<\/p>\n<p>Multiple polls <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pollingreport.com\/budget.htm\">from a variety of news outlets<\/a> all show similar results &#8212; Americans like tax cuts but don&#8217;t believe we can afford another one right now. A <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/wp-dyn?pagename=article&#038;node=&#038;contentId=A41295-2003Mar28&#038;notFound=true\">Washington Post poll<\/a> completed less than a month ago showed that two-thirds of Americans want to see Bush&#8217;s tax plan slashed significantly, while about a third of respondents would prefer to see no tax cut at all.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless of how difficult Bush&#8217;s political task is, the president is once again taking his message to &#8220;the people,&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A34715-2003Apr24.html\">complaining yesterday<\/a> to an audience in Ohio that the Senate plan to cut taxes by $350 billion was just a &#8220;little bitty&#8221; tax cut plan that was inadequate. (I know Bush has some genuinely talented speech writers, so I&#8217;m assuming he came up with &#8220;little bitty&#8221; on his own.)<\/p>\n<p>Apparently, Bush feels it&#8217;s easier to sell snake oil to an unsuspecting public by hedging the truth a bit, too.<\/p>\n<p>While Bush was whining that the Senate&#8217;s tax plan was too small, he was also arguing that his $550 billion tax cut plan would produce 1 million jobs in the next year and a half.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The package needs to be robust, so that we can create more than a million new jobs by the end of 2004,&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2003\/04\/20030424-3.html\">Bush said<\/a>. &#8220;That&#8217;s not my projection. That&#8217;s the projection of a lot of smart economists who&#8217;ve analyzed the package. They believe that if the package is implemented by the United States Congress, of at least $550 billion, more than a million new jobs will be created by the end of &#8217;04.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Who, exactly, are the &#8220;smart economists who analyzed&#8221; Bush&#8217;s plan? His own team at the White House Council of Economic Advisors. Bush made it sound like independent team of economic scholars reviewed the administration&#8217;s plan and concluded it would create over a million new jobs. That&#8217;s false. Independent economists have concluded that the administration&#8217;s projections are wildly off-the-mark and there&#8217;s little chance of Bush&#8217;s promises coming true.<\/p>\n<p>The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbpp.org\/4-17-03tax2.htm\">compiled a broad list of economists and financial institutions<\/a> that have studied the Bush plan and come to far different conclusions about projected growth. The list includes the Committee for Economic Development, the International Monetary Fund, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the centrist Brookings Institution, Goldman Sachs, the non-partisan Concord Coalition, and a statement issued by 10 Nobel Prize-winning economists. Each disagree with the White House&#8217;s claims about the great benefits we&#8217;ll reap if we follow Bush&#8217;s advice.<\/p>\n<p>At this point, you might be thinking that it&#8217;s hard to know who to believe. After all, no one really knows exactly what kind of economic growth we&#8217;ll have over the next two years. All we have are projections from experts, most of whom don&#8217;t agree with one another. It&#8217;s a fair concern. Economic projections are often incorrect.<\/p>\n<p>However, despite this uncertainty, the Bush administration is prepared to roll the dice on a very risky plan it insists will produce tremendous results. The president has made promises like this before and been mistaken. If Bush is wrong again this time, the nation&#8217;s fiscal health could suffer greatly as a consequence, with even larger deficits, higher interest rates, and more budget cuts on social programs that most Americans depend on.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s that old saying, &#8220;Fool me once, shame on you&#8230;&#8221;?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I know it can&#8217;t be easy for Bush to try and generate public demand for his tax cut plan. Even voters with a passive familiarity with current events know that the U.S. is running huge deficits, government programs are getting cut, and unless they&#8217;re pretty wealthy, they don&#8217;t have much more money in their pocket [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=150"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}