{"id":15071,"date":"2008-04-01T08:30:06","date_gmt":"2008-04-01T12:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/15071.html"},"modified":"2008-04-01T08:30:06","modified_gmt":"2008-04-01T12:30:06","slug":"mccain-obama-scratch-their-itch-wrangle-over-iraq","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/mccain-obama-scratch-their-itch-wrangle-over-iraq\/","title":{"rendered":"McCain, Obama scratch their itch, wrangle over Iraq"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, Jonathan Martin noted that it seemed as if Barack Obama and John McCain were &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/blogs\/jonathanmartin\/0308\/Itching.html\">itching<\/a>&#8221; to take each other on directly: &#8220;They just can&#8217;t wait to go at it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>And there is not just an appetite for blood, but some strategic political imperatives at work. In the science world, they call it &#8220;symbiotic.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>For Obama, it&#8217;s all about psychology and perception. The more he can set up a head-to-head narrative with the Republicans, the better to press his inevitability with superdelegates. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>McCain and his campaign view Obama as something of a preening showhorse who hasn&#8217;t paid his dues, so naturally they were happy to engage. But they also have good reason to get in this scrap: Engaging Obama on a daily basis keeps them in a news cycle that is largely focused right now on the Dem primary back-and-forth.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Quite right. I don&#8217;t doubt that McCain and his team enjoy the benefits that come with a prolonged Democratic nomination fight, but they also don&#8217;t want to spend the next five months waiting on the sidelines while the Clinton-Obama show dominates the political world&#8217;s attention.<\/p>\n<p>With this in mind, we <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/nationworld\/nation\/la-na-campaign1apr01,1,3702549.story\">saw a hint<\/a> yesterday of a what a general election campaign might look, at least with regard to the debate over Iraq policy.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In one of their sharpest exchanges of the presidential campaign, Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama clashed over the Iraq war on Monday, with each challenging the other&#8217;s credentials on national security.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Good. This is the way it&#8217;s supposed to be.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nMcCain goes on the offensive&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Responding to Obama&#8217;s frequent mocking of McCain&#8217;s suggestion that U.S. troops might remain in Iraq for 100 years, the Republican nominee-in-waiting said the Illinois senator failed to understand that America has kept forces in Korea, Japan, Germany and Kuwait long after wars in each country ended.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In all due respect, it displays a fundamental misunderstanding of history, of how we&#8217;ve maintained national security, and what we need to do in the future to maintain our security in the face of the transcendent challenge of radical Islamic extremism,&#8221; McCain told reporters on his campaign plane.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And I understand that, because he has no experience or background in any of it,&#8221; McCain added.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8230;and the Obama campaign <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/politics\/war_room\/2008\/03\/31\/mccain_obama\/index.html\">fires right back<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Barack Obama doesn&#8217;t need any lectures from John McCain, who has consistently misunderstood American national security and the history of the Middle East in arguing for an invasion and 100-year occupation of a country that had nothing to do with 9\/11. Instead of spending trillions of dollars on permanent bases that the Iraqis don&#8217;t want and that won&#8217;t keep the American people safe, Barack Obama will end the war in Iraq and finally press Iraq&#8217;s leaders to take responsibility for their future.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Obama is inexperienced, while McCain is misguided. There&#8217;s a good reason the Democrats want to have this debate in the fall &#8212; it&#8217;s eminently winnable.<\/p>\n<p>As for broader context, I think we can glean a few tidbits from all of this. First, McCain is <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/washwire\/2008\/03\/31\/mccain-attacks-obama-over-100-year-war-comments\/?mod=WSJBlog\"><i>very<\/i> sensitive<\/a> about the whole &#8220;100 years&#8221; line, which suggests Dems might want to keep emphasizing it.<\/p>\n<p>Second, I&#8217;m encouraged by the fact that the Obama campaign isn&#8217;t backing down when it comes to national security and\/or foreign policy. McCain is used to getting a free ride; the sooner it ends, the better.<\/p>\n<p>And third, it seems the best way for Hillary Clinton to engage at this point is to go after McCain, too. Yesterday, her campaign seemed largely focused on process &#8212; criticizing calls for her withdrawal and pushing for progress on Michigan&#8217;s and Florida&#8217;s convention delegates. This probably isn&#8217;t what the campaign wants right now: stories about McCain and Obama debating Iraq policy, while Clinton is addressing the nomination fight.<\/p>\n<p>The more Clinton goes after McCain, the more McCain will have to respond, and the more <i>that<\/i> will generate attention for her campaign.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, Jonathan Martin noted that it seemed as if Barack Obama and John McCain were &#8220;itching&#8221; to take each other on directly: &#8220;They just can&#8217;t wait to go at it.&#8221; And there is not just an appetite for blood, but some strategic political imperatives at work. In the science world, they call it &#8220;symbiotic.&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15071","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15071"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15071\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}