{"id":1517,"date":"2004-04-02T13:56:04","date_gmt":"2004-04-02T18:56:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/1517.html"},"modified":"2004-04-02T13:56:04","modified_gmt":"2004-04-02T18:56:04","slug":"house-gop-defies-bush-over-transportation-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/house-gop-defies-bush-over-transportation-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"House GOP defies Bush over transportation bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bush has no more reliable ally in the country than the House Republican caucus. But when it comes to spending money on transportation projects back home, even it&#8217;s willing to stand up to the president.<\/p>\n<p>A massive highway and mass transit appropriations bill has been working its way through Congress for several months. This is the kind of bill lawmakers love to treat like a Christmas tree, on which they all hang their own favorite ornaments (read: pork project).<\/p>\n<p>Bush said the most he&#8217;d be willing, at the most, to spend $256 billion on the bill. The GOP Senate already blew past that limit, approving a $318 billion version of the legislation.<\/p>\n<p>The House has been weighing a more modest bill with a $275 billion price tag, less than the Senate&#8217;s but more than the White House&#8217;s. Many House leaders on both sides of the aisle thought, in light of the Senate version, they were showing some real restraint in an election year.<\/p>\n<p>The White House didn&#8217;t see it that way and Bush threatened to veto the bill earlier this week. Then a funny thing happened: the Republicans grew recalcitrant and decided to defy Bush, effectively daring him to veto their bill. Ignoring Bush&#8217;s threat, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A44820-2004Apr2.html\">the House passed the bill<\/a> easily this morning.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The House on Friday gave emphatic support to a $275 billion highway and transit bill, voting for the prospects of new roads and jobs despite an administration warning that the bill was too expensive and would result in a presidential veto.<\/p>\n<p>The 357-65 vote sends the long-delayed six-year spending bill to a House-Senate conference and an election-year showdown with the White House over federal spending, jobs and the deficit.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There are a couple of interesting angles to this, including GOP hostility to Bush&#8217;s veto warning and what Bush will do now that the threat has been made.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nFirst, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A43229-2004Apr1.html\">House Republicans seemed emboldened<\/a>, not intimidated, by the White House.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Rather than forcing House Republicans into line, as in the past, the White House&#8217;s veto threats provoked an unprecedented revolt by congressional Republicans. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Republicans are agreed on taxes. They&#8217;re not agreed on spending, and that&#8217;s a real problem,&#8221; said Allen Schick, a professor at the University of Maryland&#8217;s School of Public Affairs&#8230;. &#8220;In the minds of congressmen, especially Republicans, they&#8217;ve met the president more than halfway, and he&#8217;s still sticking it to them,&#8221; Schick said. &#8220;The president picked the wrong fight, in [their] eyes.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is unusual. Bush&#8217;s veto threat seemed to make Republicans more anxious to vote for the bill, not less. This is a surprising display of backbone for a House that&#8217;s acted more like a rubber stamp than an independent branch of government.<\/p>\n<p>So what does Bush do now? That&#8217;s not an easy question.<\/p>\n<p>Bush hasn&#8217;t vetoed a single bill since taking office. Only three presidents in U.S. history have served a full term and not vetoed anything (Adams I, Jefferson, and Adams II), and if Bush keeps his streak alive, he&#8217;ll be the first in 176 years to do so.<\/p>\n<p>If Bush doesn&#8217;t veto, and he agrees to the House version, he&#8217;ll look weak. Bush drew a line in the sand and told lawmakers not to cross it. They did. If Bush signs the bill anyway, it&#8217;ll look like Congress effectively pushed him around and that he&#8217;s unwilling to stick to the commitment he made. Those of us who keep track of Bush&#8217;s multiple flip-flops will have a fun new addition.<\/p>\n<p>But let&#8217;s say Bush sticks to the threat and uses his veto pen, saying, &#8220;I warned Congress not to spend too much and they have ignored my advice.&#8221; What then? It&#8217;ll return to Congress for reconsideration. Could Congress override Bush&#8217;s veto? You bet it could. Look at today&#8217;s vote total again &#8212; 357 to 65.<\/p>\n<p>When a president has his veto overridden by members of his own party &#8212; in an election year &#8212; it&#8217;s a terrible embarrassment. It would be awkward enough for a Republican president to veto a Republican Congress&#8217; bill, but it&#8217;d reach a whole new level if the Republicans turned around and overruled the guy that&#8217;s supposed to be their national hero.<\/p>\n<p>Before any of that can happen, the House and Senate will go to conference to work out their differences. Expect the White House to be closely involved in those negotiations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bush has no more reliable ally in the country than the House Republican caucus. But when it comes to spending money on transportation projects back home, even it&#8217;s willing to stand up to the president. A massive highway and mass transit appropriations bill has been working its way through Congress for several months. This is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1517","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1517","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1517"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1517\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}