{"id":15420,"date":"2008-05-03T12:15:13","date_gmt":"2008-05-03T16:15:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/15420.html"},"modified":"2008-05-03T12:15:13","modified_gmt":"2008-05-03T16:15:13","slug":"leading-senate-republican-still-confused-about-non-existent-iraqal-qaeda-link","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/leading-senate-republican-still-confused-about-non-existent-iraqal-qaeda-link\/","title":{"rendered":"Leading Senate Republican still confused about non-existent Iraq\/al Qaeda link"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As was widely reported in March, the Pentagon completed a report on non-existent ties between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein&#8217;s regime, the culmination of an exhaustive review of more than 600,000 Iraqi documents that were captured after the 2003 U.S. invasion. Not surprisingly, officials <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mcclatchydc.com\/227\/story\/29959.html\">discovered what we already knew<\/a> &#8212; there was no &#8220;direct operational link&#8221; between Hussein&#8217;s Iraq and al Qaida before the invasion.<\/p>\n<p>And then there&#8217;s Sen. Jon Kyl (R) of Arizona, who doesn&#8217;t much care what the evidence says.<\/p>\n<p>Before getting into what Kyl said yesterday, keep one thing in mind &#8212; this is same guy Senate Republicans picked to be the chairman of a panel on Terrorism, Technology, and Homeland Security. He&#8217;s also the Senate Minority Whip, making him the #2 Republican in the chamber. Presumably, Kyl would have at least <i>some<\/i> clue about current events.<\/p>\n<p>But Kyl seems determined to prove otherwise. This week, the WaPo <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/04\/24\/AR2008042403481.html\">ran an item<\/a> that noted, in passing, the absence of ties between Saddam&#8217;s Iraq and al Qaeda. Kyl took it upon himself <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/05\/01\/AR2008050103202.html\">to respond<\/a> with a letter to the editor. (<a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2008\/05\/02\/kyl-feith-defense\/\">via TP<\/a>)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In 2002, then-CIA Director George Tenet wrote in a letter to Bob Graham (D-Fla.), then chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, that &#8220;our understanding of the relationship between Iraq and al-Qa&#8217;ida is evolving&#8221; and &#8220;we have solid reporting of senior level contacts between Iraq and al-Qa&#8217;ida going back a decade.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>A March 2008 report by the U.S. Joint Forces Command included information about the relationship between Hussein and Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden&#8217;s second in command: &#8220;Saddam supported groups either associated directly with al Qaeda (such as the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, led at one time by bin Laden&#8217;s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri) or that generally shared al Qaeda&#8217;s stated goals and objectives.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Critics of the war in Iraq often try to minimize &#8212; if not dismiss &#8212; the links between Saddam Hussein and terrorists. As they say, facts are stubborn things.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Yes, facts <i>are<\/i> stubborn things, which is probably why Kyl shouldn&#8217;t embarrass himself by getting the facts wrong. The Pentagon <i>just<\/i> reported on reality, for crying out loud.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIndeed, Ben at TP <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2008\/05\/02\/kyl-feith-defense\/\">broke down<\/a> Kyl&#8217;s fairly brief letter and noticed the diminishing returns as the text unfolded.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In his letter, Kyl&#8217;s Saddam-Al-Qaeda relationship theory gradually weakened as he explained the evidence. First Saddam and Al-Qaeda were directly linked, then they shared associates, then they merely shared goals and objectives, and finally, Saddam was linked just to &#8220;terrorists&#8221; in general.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Good point. Kyl is foolish enough to make a ridiculous argument, and sloppy enough to change his premise mid-way through a short letter.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s more than a little discouraging that the #2 Republican in the Senate, and ranking member on a Senate subcommittee on terrorism, doesn&#8217;t understand the basics. It&#8217;s also another reminder why it&#8217;s so difficult to take congressional Republicans seriously on matters of policy.<\/p>\n<p>Saddam <em>did<\/em> have ties to terrorism. That&#8217;s true, and no one has suggested otherwise. Saddam was a brutal thug with a bloody and vicious agenda, but he wasn&#8217;t connected to 9\/11 and he wasn&#8217;t in league with al Qaeda. Kyl may find this inconvenient, but to borrow a phrase, facts are stubborn things.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s more, as ABC News <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.abcnews.com\/rapidreport\/2008\/03\/exclusive-us-mi.html\">reported<\/a>, Saddam&#8217;s support for terrorism was rather specific &#8212; and not targeted at the U.S.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The report says Saddam&#8217;s bureaucrats carefully recorded the regime&#8217;s connections to Palestinian terrorists groups and its financial support for the families of suicide bombers.<\/p>\n<p>The primary target, however, of Saddam&#8217;s terror activities was not the United States, and not Israel. &#8220;The predominant targets of Iraqi state terror operations were Iraqi citizens, both inside and outside of Iraq.&#8221; Saddam&#8217;s primary aim was self preservation and the elimination of potential internal threats to his power.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But Kyl apparently doesn&#8217;t care. Typical.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As was widely reported in March, the Pentagon completed a report on non-existent ties between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein&#8217;s regime, the culmination of an exhaustive review of more than 600,000 Iraqi documents that were captured after the 2003 U.S. invasion. Not surprisingly, officials discovered what we already knew &#8212; there was no &#8220;direct operational [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15420"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15420\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}