{"id":15917,"date":"2008-06-18T13:35:45","date_gmt":"2008-06-18T17:35:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/15917.html"},"modified":"2008-06-18T13:35:45","modified_gmt":"2008-06-18T17:35:45","slug":"osama-bin-laden-and-habeas-corpus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/osama-bin-laden-and-habeas-corpus\/","title":{"rendered":"Osama bin Laden and habeas corpus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>MSNBC&#8217;s political blog featured an item with this headline: &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/firstread.msnbc.msn.com\/archive\/2008\/06\/17\/1148672.aspx\">Would bin Laden get habeas rights?<\/a>&#8221; And with that in mind, you can feel pretty confident that the news gets worse from there.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In a question posed toward the end of the call by Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard, the McCain campaign might have found a new talking point with which to emphasize the possible effect of the Gitmo decision. Hayes&#8217; asked if &#8212; in the campaign&#8217;s interpretation &#8212; the Court&#8217;s decision would mean that if Osama bin Laden was captured and imprisoned at Guantanamo, he too would be entitled to Habeas Corpus rights. The McCain campaign&#8217;s answer was yes.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And, of course, we&#8217;re supposed to believe any legal standard that would extend habeas rights to bin Laden necessarily means the legal standard is wrong. The Examiner <a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/a-1445814~Obama_advisers_say_bin_Laden_can_appeal_to_U_S__courts.html\">struck a similar note<\/a>, emphasizing the Obama campaign&#8217;s willingness to allow bin Laden to have habeas rights.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Barack Obama&#8217;s foreign policy advisers said Tuesday that Osama bin Laden, if captured, should be allowed to appeal his case to U.S. civilian courts, a privilege opposed by John McCain.<\/p>\n<p>Responding to questions from The Examiner, Sen. John Kerry and former White House counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke said bin Laden would benefit from last week&#8217;s Supreme Court decision giving terrorism suspects habeas corpus, the right to appeal their military detention to civilian courts.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Kerry added that bin Laden would get habeas rights no matter who gets elected president, because <em>it&#8217;s the law<\/em>. Randy Scheunemann, McCain&#8217;s senior foreign policy adviser, said those rights should not be extended to bin Laden, though it wasn&#8217;t clear what &#8220;should&#8221; has to do with this.<\/p>\n<p>I realize the political dynamic here. For the right, capturing bin Laden and following the rule of law is somehow a sign of &#8220;weakness.&#8221; If bin Laden enters the justice system, it&#8217;s akin to &#8220;coddling.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>All of this is terribly silly, and as demagoguery goes, unusually cheap.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nFirst, it&#8217;s probably worth noting that this might not just be an academic exercise if Bush hadn&#8217;t decided that capturing the al Qaeda leader who orchestrated 9\/11 was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/7843.html\">no longer important<\/a>. Indeed, perhaps we can have the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/4917.html\">Tora Bora discussion<\/a> again?<\/p>\n<p>Second, Republicans have suggested that Obama would want terrorists (including, presumably, OBL) tried in civilian courts. But <a href=\"http:\/\/nomoremister.blogspot.com\/2008\/06\/obama-hes-not-walking-anything-back-in.html\">that&#8217;s not true<\/a>, either.<\/p>\n<p>Third, getting a conviction in this case wouldn&#8217;t be especially difficult. As one of John Cole&#8217;s commenters <a href=\"http:\/\/www.balloon-juice.com\/?p=10648\">put it<\/a>, &#8220;I guess not a single person in the Justice Department has ever figured out how they&#8217;re going to try Osama bin Laden. I know it&#8217;s a complex case involving some difficult-to-pronounce syllables and maybe even some maps with even more difficult names, but are we really unprepared for a Habeas response regarding Osama Freakin&#8217; bin Laden?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And finally, the question itself about whether bin Laden would somehow qualify for habeas is itself foolish. Anonymous Liberal <a href=\"http:\/\/www.anonymousliberal.com\/2008\/06\/omg-would-bin-laden-get-habeas-rights.html\">explained<\/a> this very well:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Embedded in Hayes question is the bizarre and completely unamerican notion that your legal rights should somehow depend on how &#8220;bad&#8221; a person you are. The more serious the crimes for which you stand accused, the less rights you should have under the law. But that&#8217;s quite obviously not how any system of rights is supposed to operate. Hayes&#8217; question is like asking whether a serial killer has the right to counsel or the right to a jury trial. Of course he does. The whole point of due process is to determine <i>whether<\/i> someone is guilty. It&#8217;s the <i>punishment<\/i> that is supposed to vary depending on the seriousness of the crime, not the process.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s pathetic that someone with even moderate intelligence would ask a question like that or think that it was in any way insightful.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Quite right, but I have a hunch we&#8217;ll be hearing it again, quite often, between now and November.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MSNBC&#8217;s political blog featured an item with this headline: &#8220;Would bin Laden get habeas rights?&#8221; And with that in mind, you can feel pretty confident that the news gets worse from there. In a question posed toward the end of the call by Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard, the McCain campaign might have found [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15917","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15917","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15917"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15917\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}