{"id":15958,"date":"2008-06-22T11:15:44","date_gmt":"2008-06-22T15:15:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/15958.html"},"modified":"2008-06-22T11:15:44","modified_gmt":"2008-06-22T15:15:44","slug":"for-obama-and-the-media-there-have-been-a-lot-of-turning-points","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/for-obama-and-the-media-there-have-been-a-lot-of-turning-points\/","title":{"rendered":"For Obama and the media, there have been a lot of &#8216;turning points&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Barack Obama&#8217;s decision to skip the public financing system has <i>really<\/i> enraged the nation&#8217;s newspaper editors. I&#8217;ve already <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/15934.html\">explained<\/a> why I think all the hand-wringing is unnecessary. In fact, in some instances, the criticism is backwards &#8212; by sidestepping public financing and raising his own war chest, Obama will rely <i>less<\/i> on outside, independent groups, not <i>more<\/i>, which will mean add transparency and accountability to the process.<\/p>\n<p>But the Politico&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/0608\/11242.html\">Kenneth Vogel notes<\/a> that the slew of scathing editorials &#8212; which, by the way, were far and few between when John McCain flouted the public financing system in a legally dubious fashion &#8212; have come from all over.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Philadelphia Inquirer&#8217;s editorial board called the decision &#8220;as disappointing as it is disingenuous,&#8221; while The Boston Globe&#8217;s board wrote that it &#8220;deals a body blow &#8230; to his own reputation as a reform candidate.&#8221; And The Baltimore Sun&#8217;s editorial board called it &#8220;a major disappointment for those struggling to restrain the pernicious influence of special interests in American politics.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>The New York Times&#8217; editorial board, which endorsed Clinton after allegedly leaning toward Obama, wrote that &#8220;Obama has come up short&#8221; of &#8220;his evocative vows to depart from self-interested politics.&#8221; [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>The Washington Post opined that Obama&#8217;s &#8220;effort to cloak his broken promise in the smug mantle of selfless dedication to the public good is a little hard to take.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>And USA Today, which also did not endorse any candidates, said Obama put &#8220;expediency over principle,&#8221; was &#8220;disingenuous about his reasons for opting out of public financing&#8221; and proved he&#8217;s not a &#8220;real reformer.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, instead of public financing, Obama is accepting financing from the public. The horror. His spin may or may not be persuasive, but there&#8217;s nothing illegal or unethical about withdrawing from a flawed system. The conservative scholar who helped <i>write the law<\/i> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2008\/06\/19\/author-of-mccain-feingold_n_108132.html\">said<\/a> he &#8220;would have sued [Obama] for political malpractice&#8221; if Obama <i>hadn&#8217;t<\/i> withdrawn from the system.<\/p>\n<p>But the Politico&#8217;s Vogel added that this barrage of condemnations may &#8220;mark a turning point in what has been, on balance, fawning treatment of Obama.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I hear that a lot, which in and of itself, seems to undermine the point.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nWhen Obama flubbed his message about &#8220;bitter&#8221; voters, the media locked on and wouldn&#8217;t let go. At the time, plenty of observers thought it marked &#8220;a turning point in what has been, on balance, fawning treatment of Obama.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And when the media started running brief excerpts of Jeremiah Wright&#8217;s sermons in a 24-7 loop, plenty of observers thought it marked &#8220;a turning point in what has been, on balance, fawning treatment of Obama.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And now that Obama is going to deny public funds, it marks &#8220;a turning point in what has been, on balance, fawning treatment of Obama.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>To be sure, I can think of plenty of media personalities who seem predisposed towards a favorable opinion of Obama. Likewise, I can think of even more media personalities who seem practically ready to create a religion around John McCain.<\/p>\n<p>The point, though, is that I&#8217;m not quite sure where this &#8220;fawning&#8221; coverage is. Sure, we have clowns like Chris Matthews talking about strange feelings on his leg when Obama gives a good speech, but I&#8217;m thinking more of the general interest in various political controversies.<\/p>\n<p>I feel like the &#8220;turning points&#8221; have been obvious for quite some time. The media latched onto the Rezko story. And &#8220;NAFTA-gate.&#8221; And the alleged &#8220;plagiarism.&#8221; Every step of the way, people said, &#8220;Well, it looks like Obama&#8217;s finally getting hit by the media.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But if we keep saying that, doesn&#8217;t it necessary prove the observation false?<\/p>\n<p><i>Update<\/i>: Vogel emails to note that he was referring to a turning point among editorial-page editors. He&#8217;s quite right; that was in his original piece on the subject. My broader observation about the series of &#8220;turning points&#8221; in the relationship between the media and Obama, though, remains unchanged.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Barack Obama&#8217;s decision to skip the public financing system has really enraged the nation&#8217;s newspaper editors. I&#8217;ve already explained why I think all the hand-wringing is unnecessary. In fact, in some instances, the criticism is backwards &#8212; by sidestepping public financing and raising his own war chest, Obama will rely less on outside, independent groups, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15958","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15958","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15958"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15958\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15958"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15958"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15958"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}