{"id":15965,"date":"2008-06-23T11:00:59","date_gmt":"2008-06-23T15:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/15965.html"},"modified":"2008-06-23T11:00:59","modified_gmt":"2008-06-23T15:00:59","slug":"obama-mudcat-and-the-elusive-bubba-voter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/obama-mudcat-and-the-elusive-bubba-voter\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama, Mudcat, and the elusive &#8216;Bubba Voter&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve never been especially convinced by Dave &#8220;Mudcat&#8221; Saunders&#8217; worldview when it comes to Democrats and rural voters, but I generally find his perspective interesting enough to at least consider, whether I end up agreeing with it or not.<\/p>\n<p>With that in mind, I found the Weekly Standard&#8217;s Matt Labash&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/weeklystandard.com\/Content\/Public\/Articles\/000\/000\/015\/245uswoq.asp\">new cover story<\/a> on Mudcat, and his thoughts on Barack Obama&#8217;s chances in Appalachia, worth reading. I came away, though, less persuaded than going in.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>When I contacted Mudcat, he was in a state of blood-spitting agitation at all the Poindexter reporters trafficking in stereotypes, depicting mountain people as racist mouth-breathers, while explaining Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Appalachian problem&#8221; as if they were anthropologists dropping in on the lip-plated savages of America&#8217;s last exotic tribe. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>[A]s he once told a woman who stood up after a speech he gave to a Democratic audience to say he made compelling points, but they&#8217;d be more effective without the swearing, &#8220;Lady, there&#8217;s nothing I can do about it. Because if you&#8217;d seen what I&#8217;ve seen from elitist Democrats, you&#8217;d swear too.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He&#8217;s speaking of the breed of mostly Northeastern elitist liberal that he encounters even on his own campaigns: condescending, green around the gills from consuming too much arugula, with overdeveloped thumbs from clacking nonstop on their Blackberries, all of whom jealously guard their titles such as &#8220;deputy campaign manager of the coffee pot.&#8221; He calls them &#8220;the Harvards&#8221; (a term pinched from LBJ), though in fairness he stipulates that &#8220;there&#8217;s a lot of jerks that went to other places too.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I see. So Mudcat thinks the problem with the Democratic establishment is that DC-types look at &#8220;Bubba&#8221; with an anthropologist&#8217;s eye. Mudcat looks at the Democratic establishment as over-educated, arugula-eating elitists obsessed with their Blackberries. He went on to argue that Dems should invest less energy in pursuing the &#8220;liberal pinko commie&#8221; vote.<\/p>\n<p>Remind me, who&#8217;s engaging in cheap stereotypes? Who disdains some Americans&#8217; culture? Who&#8217;s the anthropologist?<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Just to illustrate the sort of cultural shorthand by which Dems hand Republicans the truncheon to club them with, he pursues the issue of guns. While nobody&#8217;s going to take anyone&#8217;s gun away in a country of 90 million gun owners, he says,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Why make our members vote for bulls&#8211; bills that&#8217;ll get &#8217;em beat in November? It&#8217;s all perception&#8211;nothing&#8217;s going to pass. Yet the deal is, Democrats are perceived as anti-gun. And so with a slogan like &#8216;Close the gun show loophole,&#8217; what are the first four words of that? &#8216;Close the gun show.&#8217; Bubba doesn&#8217;t mind an instant check, but closing the gun show is all he can hear. He doesn&#8217;t need to hear &#8220;loophole,&#8221; after he&#8217;s heard the first four words.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Really? <i>This<\/i> is Mudcat&#8217;s argument? Candidates should respect Bubba&#8217;s intelligence, but they should intentionally dumb down their rhetoric because he&#8217;ll only listen to the first four words of a five-word phrase?<\/p>\n<p>As Isaac Chotiner <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.tnr.com\/tnr\/blogs\/the_plank\/archive\/2008\/06\/21\/obama-s-hunt-for-the-elusive-bubba-voter.aspx\">noted<\/a>, &#8220;Now just imagine for a moment that Howard Dean had said this. The clear implication is that &#8216;Bubba&#8217; is, er, not smart enough to understand more than the first four words. Or that &#8216;Bubba&#8217; does not have the capability to focus on more than four words. Either Saunders is being condescending, or he is revealing something about his beloved &#8216;Bubba Voter&#8217; that proves the argument he believes elitist Democrats are making.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If anyone holds that a black guy can&#8217;t win in these parts, says Mudcat, then they ought to notify former Virginia governor Doug Wilder, a black guy who won 20 years ago. Wilder, of course, knew how to speak the language and get through to even the most resistant parts of the culture.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Well, maybe. Virginia also has a few populous counties along its northern border that are pretty liberal, and Richmond that has a sizable African-American population. Neither can be said about West Virginia, which is where Mudcat thinks Obama should invest his energy.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Mudcat doesn&#8217;t deny that Obama&#8217;s race could be a factor. Since Obama doesn&#8217;t come around Appalachia much, having taken a powder in places like West Virginia and Kentucky, &#8220;nobody knows about Obama out here. All we know is that he&#8217;s black. That&#8217;s all we know. That&#8217;s all anyone wants to tell us.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Maybe it&#8217;s because there&#8217;s ample evidence, at least in advance of the Democratic primary, that race was a deal-breaker?<\/p>\n<p>If the article is any indication, I still feel like Mudcat&#8217;s pitch needs some work.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve never been especially convinced by Dave &#8220;Mudcat&#8221; Saunders&#8217; worldview when it comes to Democrats and rural voters, but I generally find his perspective interesting enough to at least consider, whether I end up agreeing with it or not. With that in mind, I found the Weekly Standard&#8217;s Matt Labash&#8217;s new cover story on Mudcat, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15965"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15965\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}