{"id":15989,"date":"2008-06-25T09:15:32","date_gmt":"2008-06-25T13:15:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/15989.html"},"modified":"2008-06-25T09:15:32","modified_gmt":"2008-06-25T13:15:32","slug":"obama-2-dobson-0","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/obama-2-dobson-0\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama 2, Dobson 0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following up on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/15978.html\">an item<\/a> from yesterday, Focus on the Family&#8217;s James Dobson launched a fairly aggressive offensive against Barack Obama on the religious right leader&#8217;s radio show, accusing the senator of &#8220;dragging biblical understanding through the gutter.&#8221; Yesterday afternoon, <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20080625\/ap_on_el_pr\/dobson_obama;_ylt=AnXkv0WgvxTKfs3ufM.n6SNp24cA\">Obama responded<\/a> to the criticism.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Barack Obama said Tuesday that evangelical leader James Dobson was &#8220;making stuff up&#8221; when he accused the presumed Democratic presidential nominee of distorting the Bible.<\/p>\n<p>Dobson used his Focus on the Family radio program to highlight excerpts of a speech Obama gave in June 2006 to the liberal Christian group Call to Renewal.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking to reporters on his campaign plane before landing in Los Angeles, Obama said the speech made the argument that people of faith, like himself, &#8220;try to translate some of our concerns in a universal language so that we can have an open and vigorous debate rather than having religion divide us.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Obama added, &#8220;I think you&#8217;ll see that he was just making stuff up, maybe for his own purposes.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Dobson was worked up, in large part because Obama, in his 2006 speech, criticized the notion of basing public policy on a literal interpretation of one religion&#8217;s sacred text &#8212; in Dobson&#8217;s case, the Christian Bible. Obama explained why this would be a mistake, pointing to specific Old Testament passages, including rules in Leviticus on approving slavery and condemning the eating of stonefish. &#8220;So before we get carried away, let&#8217;s read our Bible now,&#8221; Obama said in the speech. &#8220;Folks haven&#8217;t been reading their Bible.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Dobson&#8217;s response is that Obama is &#8220;deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible,&#8221; because Old Testament texts and dietary codes <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/aponline\/washington\/AP-REL-Dobson-Obama.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin\">no longer apply<\/a> to Jesus&#8217; teachings in the New Testament.<\/p>\n<p>As a theological issue, Dobson&#8217;s on thin ice. As a political issue, Dobson probably doesn&#8217;t realize what a mistake he&#8217;s made.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nFirst, the theology. Dobson believes in a literal interpretation of every word in the Christian Bible. Obama, in his &#8217;06 speech, pointed to specific passages from the Christian Bible. As such, as far as Dobson is concerned, Obama was &#8220;distorting&#8221; the &#8220;traditional understanding&#8221; of the Bible? Something doesn&#8217;t add up here &#8212; if every word of Scripture is literally true, how can anyone distort the Bible by pointing to specific passages?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Traditional understanding&#8221; sounds like some kind of liberal, mamby-pamby, after-the-fact interpretation of the Bible&#8217;s plain text, when Dobson is supposed to be, to borrow an expression, a <i>strict constructionist<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, there&#8217;s a bunch of great examples from the Old Testament. Parents can stone a misbehaving child; fathers can sell daughters into slavery; garments made of two different kinds of threads are a real no-no; the list goes on and on. Dobson, on the one hand, believes every word of the Bible is literally true. Dobson, on the other hand, also argues we shouldn&#8217;t believe every word of the Bible is literally true but should instead accept a &#8220;traditional understanding&#8221; of the Bible. To do otherwise, is to &#8220;distort&#8221; Scripture.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, Dobson apparently wants the focus to remain on the New Testament. Note to Dr. Jim: Christians are supposed to embrace <i>both<\/i> Testaments.<\/p>\n<p>As for the politics, Dobson is inadvertently reinforcing Obama&#8217;s &#8220;turn the page&#8221; theme. The senator is talking about a new approach; Dobson wants an old approach. Obama believes the religious right movement need not speak for people of faith; Dobson says the religious right movement <i>has to<\/i> speak for people of faith. Obama sees religion as inclusive; Dobson sees it as exclusive.<\/p>\n<p>It creates the dynamic Obama wants. In fact, the AP noted that the Rev. Kirbyjon Caldwell, a Methodist pastor from Texas and longtime supporter of President Bush who has endorsed Obama, said Tuesday he belongs to a group of religious leaders who, working independently of Obama&#8217;s campaign, launched <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jamesdobsondoesntspeakforme.com\">James Dobson Doesn&#8217;t Speak For Me.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t think Dobson thought this one through.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following up on an item from yesterday, Focus on the Family&#8217;s James Dobson launched a fairly aggressive offensive against Barack Obama on the religious right leader&#8217;s radio show, accusing the senator of &#8220;dragging biblical understanding through the gutter.&#8221; Yesterday afternoon, Obama responded to the criticism. Barack Obama said Tuesday that evangelical leader James Dobson was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15989"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15989\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}