{"id":16138,"date":"2008-07-09T11:15:54","date_gmt":"2008-07-09T15:15:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/16138.html"},"modified":"2008-07-09T11:15:54","modified_gmt":"2008-07-09T15:15:54","slug":"about-those-300-mccain-loving-economists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/about-those-300-mccain-loving-economists\/","title":{"rendered":"About those 300 McCain-loving economists&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, the McCain campaign triumphantly released a joint statement from 300 economists who &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.johnmccain.com\/Informing\/News\/PressReleases\/Read.aspx?guid=c90681b9-5dfe-4de4-8057-ceedb30c228d\">enthusiastically support<\/a>&#8221; the senator&#8217;s economic plan. Almost immediately, the statement looked a little sketchy, given they only endorsed his plan after <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/16115.html\">taking out<\/a> two of the more transparently stupid centerpiece ideas of the plan &#8212; the gas tax holiday and his promise to balance the budget by the end of his first term.<\/p>\n<p>Today, the press stunt looks even worse. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/0708\/11618.html\">Alexander Burns and Avi Zenilman found<\/a> that many of the 300 economists &#8220;don&#8217;t actually support the whole of McCain&#8217;s economic agenda&#8221; and at least one of McCain&#8217;s 300 economists &#8220;doesn&#8217;t even support McCain for president.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In interviews with more than a dozen of the signatories, Politico found that, far from embracing McCain&#8217;s economic plan, many were unfamiliar with &#8212; or downright opposed to &#8212; key details. While most of those contacted by Politico had warm feelings about McCain, many did not want to associate themselves too closely with his campaign and its policy prescriptions.<\/p>\n<p>Howard Beales, an economist at George Washington University, explained that he signed the letter as &#8220;an expression of support for [McCain], not necessarily each and every detail of his plan, which I may not have had time to study closely.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Constantine Alexandrakis, a professor at the University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, not only supports Obama, but also rejects the notion that Bush&#8217;s tax cuts should be made permanent (a key facet of McCain&#8217;s plan). &#8220;I would describe myself as an Obama supporter,&#8221; he explained. &#8220;Maybe I shouldn&#8217;t have rushed into signing the letter.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Apparently, adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin and former eBay CEO Meg Whitman began collecting signatures from economists months ago as a way of demonstrating general support for McCain&#8217;s broad economic priorities, not the specific (and ridiculous) 15-page report the McCain campaign released at the same time as the list of the 300 economists.<\/p>\n<p>But that hasn&#8217;t stopped McCain from boasting on national television that his plan has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2008\/07\/08\/mccain-talks-economy-on-c_n_111434.html\">received the blessing<\/a> of &#8220;a whole lot of economists, including Nobel laureates.&#8221;<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nAs long as we&#8217;re on the subject, I&#8217;d also note a really <a href=\"http:\/\/obsidianwings.blogs.com\/obsidian_wings\/2008\/07\/even-more-mccai.html\">terrific item<\/a> hilzoy had yesterday on McCain and economics.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>He has a few ideas lodged in his head, without anything like the background he&#8217;d need in order to question or assess them, and without any discernible interest in learning more. He doesn&#8217;t keep basic, basic facts straight, or know really elementary aspects of his own policies.<\/p>\n<p>I never thought I&#8217;d end up covering John McCain like this. I expected, after eight years of Bush, to be able to argue about genuine philosophical and policy differences, rather than going on about the most basic matters of competence. But McCain&#8217;s performance so far is just frightening. We&#8217;ve had eight years of a clueless President who governs on the basis of his gut plus a few stray ideas that wafted in on the breeze and somehow stuck. We do not need four more.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Quite right. When Bush decided to run for president during Clinton&#8217;s second term, he&#8217;d effectively held public office for about two years. He&#8217;d failed in business, after struggling in school, and didn&#8217;t have a clue about economics (or much else). No one expected much in the way of coherence, and Bush met the low expectations.<\/p>\n<p>With McCain, I&#8217;ve long assumed that the entire nature of the debate would change &#8212; Dems would be up against someone who was merely wrong, not embarrassing.<\/p>\n<p>But that&#8217;s probably been the single most surprising aspect of the campaign so far, at least to me. On almost every subject of significance, <i>especially<\/i> on the economy, McCain has proven himself to be, for lack of a better phrase, utterly foolish. He doesn&#8217;t understand Social Security. He doesn\u2019t understand interest rates. He doesn&#8217;t understand how supply and demand affect energy policy. He doesn&#8217;t understand that tax cuts don&#8217;t generate government revenue. He can&#8217;t even begin to explain how he&#8217;d keep his transparently ridiculous promises about eliminating a $400 billion deficit in four years.<\/p>\n<p>Under the circumstances, I&#8217;m not sure if I should feel sorry for McCain, or be offended that he sincerely believes he should be president.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, the McCain campaign triumphantly released a joint statement from 300 economists who &#8220;enthusiastically support&#8221; the senator&#8217;s economic plan. Almost immediately, the statement looked a little sketchy, given they only endorsed his plan after taking out two of the more transparently stupid centerpiece ideas of the plan &#8212; the gas tax holiday and his [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16138"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16138\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}