{"id":1658,"date":"2004-04-27T13:10:51","date_gmt":"2004-04-27T18:10:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/1658.html"},"modified":"2004-04-27T13:10:51","modified_gmt":"2004-04-27T18:10:51","slug":"white-house-blinks-in-fight-with-house-gop-over-transportation-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/white-house-blinks-in-fight-with-house-gop-over-transportation-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"White House blinks in fight with House GOP over transportation bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To update a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/001517.html\">post<\/a> from a few weeks ago, there&#8217;s been progress between Congress and the White House over funding for a federal transportation bill. Some are suggesting that the House GOP caved to Bush&#8217;s concerns, but I see it the other way.<\/p>\n<p>To refresh your memory, a massive (read: expensive) highway and mass transit appropriations bill has been working its way through Congress for several months. Bush, anxious to appear responsible in an election year, said he&#8217;d support a bill that cost no more than $256 billion. The House was weighing a relatively modest bill with a $275 billion price tag, less expensive than the Senate&#8217;s version but more than the White House&#8217;s. Many House leaders on both sides of the aisle thought, in light of the Senate version, they were showing some real restraint in an election year.<\/p>\n<p>The White House balked and threatened to veto the House version, insisting it cost too much. The House, including most Republicans, didn&#8217;t care and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A44820-2004Apr2.html\">passed their $275 billion bill anyway<\/a>. In fact, the vote wasn&#8217;t even close &#8212; 357 to 65. Bush&#8217;s threat was seen as meaningless, or worse, a motivating factor to vote <i>for<\/i> it, not against it.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.thehill.com\/news\/042704\/truce.aspx\">The Hill reported<\/a> today that the GOP was getting a little nervous about this showdown. Bush hasn&#8217;t vetoed anything his entire term and it seemed odd to start with a transportation bill that has strong bipartisan backing. On the other hand, Bush would be <i>really<\/i> embarrassed if the House overrode his veto, which the chamber had the votes to do. The Hill said Hastert made concessions to make Bush happy.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) has decided to avoid an embarrassing election-year veto of the transportation reauthorization bill at all costs, say Republican sources on the Hill. <\/p>\n<p>Hastert, the House&#8217;s point person in negotiations with the Bush administration, has decided to pass on a 30- or 60-day extension of the transportation bill and use the extra time to whittle down the cost to a level acceptable to the president.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That sounds awfully conciliatory until you get to the good part:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>GOP leaders believe the White House will accept a transportation reauthorization bill totaling $275 billion over six years.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nNow, tell me, who&#8217;s getting the better end of this deal? Bush said $256 billion for the bill and not a penny more. The House said $275 billion is reasonable. There&#8217;s some contentious discussions and the White House is now &#8220;willing to accept&#8221; a bill that costs $275 billion.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t claim to be an expert on negotiations, but it sounds to me like Bush blinked.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, Bush could still back up his line-in-the-sand threat and veto the legislation.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Republican political observers have said the president is itching to veto the transportation bill because he has been stung by criticism from members of the GOP&#8217;s conservative base for allowing the rate of federal spending to surge during his first three years in office. A veto of the pork-laden bill, they argue, would burnish the president&#8217;s bona fides among fiscal conservatives.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But that&#8217;s a problematic course. Congress could override the veto, and even if it didn&#8217;t, it would look bad that Republicans were fighting Republicans over a mass transit bill.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>GOP leaders believe that a presidential veto of a major bill and a possible override of that veto by the Republican-controlled House and Senate would be bad politics six months before an election, especially since President Bush has not yet vetoed a single bill during his first term.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Moreover, the House doesn&#8217;t like the idea of Bush triangulating against them in an election year.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[O]ne rank-and-file GOP member said that House leaders are not enthusiastic about the president&#8217;s running as a fiscal conservative in contrast to the GOP-controlled Congress.<\/p>\n<p>The lawmaker said that as Election Day nears &#8220;it&#8217;s every branch for itself,&#8221; referring to the diverging interests of the White House and Congress.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Gotta love it when the Republicans are fighting amongst themselves and using phrases like &#8220;every branch for itself.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To update a post from a few weeks ago, there&#8217;s been progress between Congress and the White House over funding for a federal transportation bill. Some are suggesting that the House GOP caved to Bush&#8217;s concerns, but I see it the other way. To refresh your memory, a massive (read: expensive) highway and mass transit [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1658","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1658"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1658\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}