{"id":1788,"date":"2004-05-18T12:07:30","date_gmt":"2004-05-18T17:07:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/1788.html"},"modified":"2004-05-18T12:07:30","modified_gmt":"2004-05-18T17:07:30","slug":"gao-asked-to-review-electronic-voting-systems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/gao-asked-to-review-electronic-voting-systems\/","title":{"rendered":"GAO asked to review electronic voting systems"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the truly scary controversies that hands over our democracy is the system of electronic, touch-screen voting that will be in place this November. Several blogs cover this issue thoroughly, so I don&#8217;t mention it as often as I probably should, but if you know anything about it, you know these systems are ripe for unchecked fraud and abuse.<\/p>\n<p>For a quick, visually-entertaining primer on this, Tom Tomorrow <a href=\"http:\/\/www.workingforchange.com\/comic.cfm?itemid=15882\">drew us a picture<\/a> (literally) last fall, which I highly recommend. The guy can do more in six frames than most of us can do in 600 words.<\/p>\n<p>In a nutshell, there are a few companies manufacturing touch-screen voting machines used widely nationwide. A few serious problems plague the machines and the system. Non-partisan tech experts and state investigators have reviewed the security flaws and determined that the machines are easily manipulated. Worse, the machines leave no paper trail, so it&#8217;s difficult, if not impossible, to know when a mistake has occurred.<\/p>\n<p>And, to add insult to injury, the machines are owned and manufactured by Bush loyalists who are committed to helping him win a second term.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s important to note, however, that there&#8217;s no reason for this to be a partisan issue. Everyone should want a fair and reliable system that accurately counts votes. Our democracy depends on it.<\/p>\n<p>Thankfully, there seems to be some &#8212; not a lot, but <i>some<\/i> &#8212; progress in generating bi-partisan attention for this issue in Congress.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nAs <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rollcall.com\/issues\/49_125\/morning\/5590-1.html\">Roll Call reported<\/a> this week:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Amid media and academic reports that electronic voting systems may be vulnerable to manipulation, more than a dozen House lawmakers have asked the General Accounting Office to conduct a &#8216;high priority&#8217; study of the security of electronic voting systems.<\/p>\n<p>In a letter dispatched Friday to Comptroller General David Walker, Government Reform Chairman Tom Davis (R-Va.) and ranking member Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) joined several other Members in asking the agency to closely examine optical scanners, punch-card readers and direct-recording electronic voting machines. <\/p>\n<p>The letter seeks &#8220;best practices that can be implemented to improve the security and reliability of the electronic voting process&#8221; as well as a post-election survey of state and local election officials to determine whether they are complying with their states&#8217; policies and procedures to ensure security and reliability.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Because I am understandably viewed as a partisan, let me emphasize that the 13 members who requested the GAO investigation actually <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fcw.com\/fcw\/articles\/2004\/0510\/web-evote-05-14-04.asp\">featured more Republicans than Dems<\/a>. Good for them.<\/p>\n<p>As pleased as I am to see movement on this, I&#8217;m still concerned it&#8217;s not happening quickly enough. The GAO does reliable work, but it&#8217;s time consuming. Chances are, unreliable direct recording electronic machines will be used <i>this November<\/i>, no matter what. A GAO report may help lawmakers create a more accurate system for the future, but I&#8217;m nevertheless concerned about this year.<\/p>\n<p>That said, progress is progress. Bi-partisan concern for the integrity of elections is very encouraging and hopefully the GAO can help provide Congress with a plan for improving what is clearly a flawed system.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the truly scary controversies that hands over our democracy is the system of electronic, touch-screen voting that will be in place this November. Several blogs cover this issue thoroughly, so I don&#8217;t mention it as often as I probably should, but if you know anything about it, you know these systems are ripe [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1788"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1788\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}