{"id":2561,"date":"2004-09-17T13:41:00","date_gmt":"2004-09-17T18:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/2561.html"},"modified":"2004-09-17T13:41:00","modified_gmt":"2004-09-17T18:41:00","slug":"poll-day-23","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/poll-day-23\/","title":{"rendered":"Poll Day"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s time for everybody&#8217;s favorite Friday feature &#8212; Poll Day, my round-up of statewide presidential polls released over the last seven days. (If you&#8217;re new, welcome; we do this every Friday.)<\/p>\n<p>This week&#8217;s Poll Day is the biggest ever, with a whopping 36 states offering data. Some of the numbers are encouraging, others not so much. There are several &#8220;Red&#8221; states that are competitive enough to make the Republicans very nervous (Colorado, Missouri, Nevada), while there are some &#8220;Blue&#8221; states that appear to be moving in the wrong direction (especially Wisconsin). Also note that pollsters are definitely playing favorites right now &#8212; there are three polls out of Wisconsin this week, and <i>five each<\/i> for Minnesota and Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n<p>A few other notes to consider: Rasmussen doesn&#8217;t include Nader in any of its polling, even in states where he&#8217;s likely to be on the ballot. American Research Group included Nader, but was omitted here in states where his support was below 1%. Strategic Vision is a Republican polling outfit, so keep that in mind when you consider their data. There were also some interesting national polls released in the last few days, which I reference below the state data.<\/p>\n<p>As always, all of my data reflects &#8220;likely voters,&#8221; when available. And without further ado&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><b>Alabama<\/b> (9 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.montgomeryadvertiser.com\/NEWSV5\/storyV5BUSHKERRY02W.htm\">Capital Survey<\/a> &#8212; Bush 54, Kerry 34<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rasmussenreports.com\/Alabama Sept 15.htm\">Rasmussen<\/a> &#8212; Bush 53, Kerry 42<\/p>\n<p><b>Alaska<\/b> (3 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Bush 57, Kerry 30, Nader 5<\/p>\n<p><b>California<\/b> (55 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 52, Bush 41<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\n<b>Colorado<\/b> (9 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Bush 46, Kerry 45, Nader 3<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.insidedenver.com\/drmn\/election\/article\/0,1299,DRMN_36_3188882,00.html\">Rocky Mountain News<\/a> &#8212; Bush 45, Kerry 44<br \/>\n<i>Comment<\/i>: Bush won Colorado by eight points four years ago, but now it&#8217;s looking like a prime pick-up opportunity. With nine electoral votes on the line, that&#8217;s no small feat.<\/p>\n<p><b>Florida<\/b> (27 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.surveyusa.com\/2004_Elections\/FL040914pressen.pdf\">Survey USA<\/a> &#8212; Bush 51, Kerry 45<\/p>\n<p><b>Georgia<\/b> (15 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.strategicvision.biz\/political\/georgia.htm\">Strategic Vision<\/a> &#8212; Bush 58, Kerry 36<\/p>\n<p><b>Hawaii<\/b> (4 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 51, Bush 41, Nader 4<\/p>\n<p><b>Idaho<\/b> (4 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Bush 59, Kerry 30, Nader 3<\/p>\n<p><b>Illinois<\/b> (21 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.surveyusa.com\/2004_Elections\/IL040915pressen.pdf\">Survey USA<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 49, Bush 45<\/p>\n<p><b>Indiana<\/b> (11 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.surveyusa.com\/2004_Elections\/IN040910presgovsen.pdf\">Survey USA<\/a> &#8212; Bush 60, Kerry 36<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.southbendtribune.com\/stories\/2004\/09\/11\/local.20040911-sbt-MWKA-A1-Poll_shows_Daniels_l.sto\">Research 2000<\/a> &#8212; Bush 54, Kerry 38<\/p>\n<p><b>Kansas<\/b> (6 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.surveyusa.com\/2004_Elections\/KS040910president.pdf\">Survey USA<\/a> &#8212; Bush 60, Kerry 35<\/p>\n<p><b>Kentucky<\/b> (8 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.surveyusa.com\/2004_Elections\/KY040910pressenamend.pdf\">Survey USA<\/a> &#8212; Bush 56, Kerry 39<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Bush 57, Kerry 39, Nader 1<\/p>\n<p><b>Louisiana<\/b> (9 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nola.com\/news\/t-p\/washington\/index.ssf?\/base\/news-0\/1094968601124090.xml\">Marketing Research<\/a> &#8211;Bush 53, Kerry 36<\/p>\n<p><b>Maine<\/b> (4 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/pressherald.mainetoday.com\/news\/state\/040912poll.shtml\">Zogby<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 43, Bush 43<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 48, Bush 44, Nader 4<\/p>\n<p><b>Maryland<\/b> (10 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 52, Bush 43, Nader 2<\/p>\n<p><b>Massachusetts<\/b> (12 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 64, Bush 27<\/p>\n<p><b>Michigan<\/b> (17 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/politicselections\/nation\/polls\/2004-09-14-mich.htm\">Gallup<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 50, Bush 44<\/p>\n<p><b>Minnesota<\/b> (10 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.startribune.com\/stories\/784\/4981594.html\">Star-Tribune<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 50, Bush 41<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.kaaltv.com\/article\/view\/81227\/\">Gallup<\/a> &#8212; Bush 45, Kerry 45<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/news.minnesota.publicradio.org\/features\/2004\/09\/16_mccalluml_pollresults\/\">Mason-Dixon<\/a> &#8212; Bush 46, Kerry 45<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/strategicvision.biz\/political\/state.htm\">Strategic Vision<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 49, Bush 45<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 47, Bush 45, Nader 2<\/p>\n<p><b>Missouri<\/b> (11 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.surveyusa.com\/2004_Elections\/MO040910presgovsen.pdf\">Survey USA<\/a> &#8212; Bush 48, Kerry 46<\/p>\n<p><b>Montana<\/b> (3 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Bush 60, Kerry 32, Nader 3<\/p>\n<p><b>Nebraska<\/b> (5 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Bush 61, Kerry 30, Nader 2<\/p>\n<p><b>Nevada<\/b> (5 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.surveyusa.com\/2004_Elections\/NV040914president.pdf\">Survey USA<\/a> &#8212; Bush 51, Kerry 47<\/p>\n<p><b>New Jersey<\/b> (15 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.strategicvision.biz\/political\/newjersey.htm\">Strategic Vision<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 47, Bush 43<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.surveyusa.com\/2004_Elections\/NJ040915president.pdf\">Survey USA<\/a> &#8212; Bush 49, Kerry 45<\/p>\n<p><b>New York<\/b> (31 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.quinnipiac.edu\/x11372.xml\">Quinnipiac<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 47, Bush 41<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.maristpoll.marist.edu\/nyspolls\/PZ040915.htm\">Marist<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 48, Bush 40<\/p>\n<p><b>North Carolina<\/b> (15 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rasmussenreports.com\/North Carolina Sept 11.htm\">Rasmussen<\/a> &#8212; Bush 55, Kerry 42<\/p>\n<p><b>North Dakota<\/b> (3 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Bush 62, Kerry 33, Nader 1<\/p>\n<p><b>Ohio<\/b> (20 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/columbusdispatch.com\/?story=dispatch\/2004\/09\/12\/20040912-A12-03.html\">Columbus Dispatch<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 46, Bush 46<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.strategicvision.biz\/political\/ohio.htm\">Strategic Vision<\/a> &#8212; Bush 52, Kerry 42<\/p>\n<p><b>Oregon<\/b> (7 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 47, Bush 45, Nader 2<\/p>\n<p><b>Pennsylvania<\/b> (21 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.surveyusa.com\/2004_Elections\/PA040910pressen.pdf\">Survey USA<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 49, Bush 47<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rasmussenreports.com\/Pennsylvania Sept 13.htm\">Rasmussen<\/a> &#8212; Bush 49, Kerry 48<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/sections\/politics\/Vote2004\/poll_pennsylvania_040915.html\">ABC News<\/a> &#8212; Bush 49, Kerry 48<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.quinnipiac.edu\/x11379.xml?ReleaseID=400\">Quinnipiac<\/a> &#8212; Bush 47, Kerry 44<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/pittsburghlive.com\/x\/tribune-review\/election\/s_252073.html\">Keystone<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 49, Bush 49<\/p>\n<p><b>Rhode Island<\/b> (4 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 58, Bush 30, Nader 4<\/p>\n<p><b>South Dakota<\/b> (3 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cpod.ubc.ca\/polls\/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewItem&#038;itemID=4146\">Rasmussen<\/a> &#8212; Bush 51, Kerry 41<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Bush 58, Kerry 39, Nader 1<\/p>\n<p><b>Utah<\/b> (5 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/deseretnews.com\/dn\/view\/0,1249,595090764,00.html\">Deseret Morning News<\/a> &#8212; Bush 65, Kerry 25<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Bush 64, Kerry 27, Nader 4<br \/>\n<i>Comment<\/i>: Four percent of Utahans are backing Nader?<\/p>\n<p><b>Vermont<\/b> (4 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 50, Bush 40, Nader 4<\/p>\n<p><b>Washington<\/b> (11 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Kerry 51, Bush 44, Nader 2<br \/>\n<i>Comment<\/i>: I heard this week that the Bush campaign was all but giving up on Washington, pulling most of their ad money and redirecting it to more competitive states. Kerry&#8217;s lead may only be seven, but this one&#8217;s pretty much a done deal.<\/p>\n<p><b>Wisconsin<\/b> (10 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/politicselections\/nation\/polls\/2004-09-13-wisc.htm\">Gallup<\/a> &#8212; Bush 52, Kerry 44<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rasmussenreports.com\/Wisconsin Sept 14.htm\">Rasmussen<\/a> &#8212; Bush 49, Kerry 47<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.strategicvision.biz\/political\/wisconsin.htm\">Strategic Vision<\/a> &#8212; Bush 49, Kerry 44<br \/>\n<i>Comment<\/i>: Someday, someone will have to explain to me how this state slipped so far, so fast.<\/p>\n<p><b>Wyoming<\/b> (3 electoral votes)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/americanresearchgroup.com\/\">American Research Group<\/a> &#8212; Bush 65, Kerry 29, Nader 2<\/p>\n<p>As for the national polling data, which I continue to find largely useless at this point, there&#8217;s been widespread hand-wringing. Too much, in fact.<\/p>\n<p>Bush got a bump in the polls immediately after the GOP convention. Was this pleasant to watch? Of course not. Did it last? Definitely not.<\/p>\n<p>The Pew Research Center, for example, released a poll showing Bush&#8217;s 16-point, post-convention lead disappearing completely this week. The race, Pew says, is now at Bush 47, Kerry 46. If that should cause anyone to panic, it&#8217;s BC04, not those of us anxious for a Kerry victory.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, Rasmussen, Zogby, and ICR show Bush&#8217;s lead at one or two points, while American Research Group and Harris Interactive show <i>Kerry<\/i> with a modest lead. In other words, we&#8217;ve come full circle in just a couple of weeks. The race was effectively tied at the national level before the GOP convention and it&#8217;s effectively tied at the national level now. So for goodness sakes, get over your anxiety and start rejecting the media myth that Bush&#8217;s campaign is &#8220;surging ahead.&#8221; It&#8217;s not.<\/p>\n<p>But, I hear you asking, what about Gallup? Yes, I&#8217;ve seen the new poll showing Bush&#8217;s lead growing to 13 points in the new Gallup poll. Frankly, I don&#8217;t care what Gallup says anymore; they&#8217;ve been too wrong for too long. When six &#8212; count &#8217;em, six &#8212; national polls conducted at the same time show the race within two points either way and one poll says Bush is up by 13, it&#8217;s pretty easy to believe that the oddball is probably wrong.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, it also didn&#8217;t make any sense when Gallup was the only polling outfit to show Kerry getting a <i>negative<\/i> bounce after the Dem National Convention. And it was equally nonsensical when, less than a week before Gore won the popular vote by 500,000 votes, Gallup had Bush <a href=\"http:\/\/nomoremister.blogspot.com\/2004\/09\/kerrys-up-by-1-in-harris-poll-kerry.html\">up by 13 points<\/a> nationally.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s time for everybody&#8217;s favorite Friday feature &#8212; Poll Day, my round-up of statewide presidential polls released over the last seven days. (If you&#8217;re new, welcome; we do this every Friday.) This week&#8217;s Poll Day is the biggest ever, with a whopping 36 states offering data. Some of the numbers are encouraging, others not so [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2561"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2561\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}